Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you.   I will commence this action tomorrow as I cannot do so until after the 1/12/23.  thank you.  lesley. 
    • Despite past trends, US consumers are spending at record level. Economists are mystified – and grappling to forecast an end point.View the full article
    • Just go for the full value of the jacket. I haven't really followed the thread very well – was that the declared value. Maybe you can just give a very brief summary of how the puzzle over the value has happened. In terms of the video presentation, I'm pleased you enjoyed it – but I'm going to say now – the fact that we had to draw your attention to it means that you really haven't done much reading. You are coming across as extremely under confident. If you take a day or 2 to do some solid reading of the stories on the sub- forum then it will help you a great deal in your confidence and also in your approach to your forthcoming mediation. It's not a waste of time. This forum is about self empowerment. We try to direct you and we provide you with materials that we expect you to do your share of the work
    • Correct and its not your concern for the safety of a Bailiff..there have been recent developments in which Judgment of + £600 can now be transferred up to High Court for enforcement purposes. If the judgment obtained in the County Court is over £5000 and the claimant wishes to enforce this by way of execution against the debtor’s goods, then it must be transferred up to the High Court for enforcement. This will be undertaken by a High Court Enforcement Officer. An important development is that smaller claims (£600 and above) in the County Court, known as County Court Judgments (CCJs), are increasingly also being transferred up to the High Court for enforcement. This is owing to: a) The High Court Enforcement Officer greater powers. b) Unlike County Court Bailiffs, HCEOs also work within a private company and are paid on results – based on the amount that is collected.
    • Hahaha! That video really did put things into a funny perspective for me, brave of them to state their defence to a court too. Thank you for the laugh, really helped to lighten the weight I had been feeling from this situation   Any advice on the price of the jacket argument before I go to mediation? Like I said, I have full proof of the receipt and email entries 
  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4


    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4




      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
      • 2 replies

Loan Options.net

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3493 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Has anyone experienced this company ? On the 26th April I applied for a loan on-line with a different company I then recieved an incredibly misleading text message with a link which gave me a page saying i had been accepted and saying about a fee od £67 payments would be about £10 a week which I believed was actually for a loan,when in reality all I got was a list of companies, once I realised this I sent them several e,mails via their contact section BEFORE they took the money from my card on the 6th May, On the site it says in order to cancell click on my account and then on cancell account .....This was not available untill AFTER they took the payment from my card, I immediatley did this as soon as that option came up and filled in a cancelation form AND a Refund request form this was on the 3rd May, It then took them another 4 days to get back to me and tell me to write a letter to request a refund evan though I had allready filled in a refund request online I sent this via recorded deliverey which was recieved into their office on Wednesday, I got a text yesterday saying that the letter was recieved and that they were looking into it, They got back saying that they had authorised a refund of £38.12 saying they had retained £15 for something called "Credit Cleaner" which I have never heard of nor do I have any informnation about it or know what it is ? and also £1 a day for being a Member and having acess to the site.

I have got back onto them saying i want the other £29 back or i shall go to the fsa and make a complant under section 155 of the consumer credit act 1974

I was just wondering do I also have a case in regards to me contacting them BEFORE they took the money asking them not to and for them to cancel my account ?

Also are they beraking any rules by not offering a "Cooling Off Period" ? If anyone has had any dealings with them I would be gratefull for any advice Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...