Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

debt adjuster/ financial mediator wont give me back my money.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3709 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I would be very grateful for some help.

 

5 years ago we approached a debt management company to help resolve our financial issues by way of settlement.

 

They were undertaking the work on a no win no fee basis,

and required the settlement sum of money to be deposited in their client account.

 

They have not solved the problem - in fact we are in a worse position.

 

When we asked for our funds to be returned they objected on the grounds that we had not provided them with the information they had requested.

 

This is totally fabricated and we have no way of proving it as it is our word against theirs.

 

We were forced to accept a reduced amount of our money to be returned back to us under with out prejudice agreement.

 

They have not honoured this agreement and refuse to answer our phone calls or answer our letters.

 

This is heading towards litigation please would someone advise me on :

 

1. Is this a fraudulent offence ?

 

2. Can we present the "without prejudice save as to cost" agreement for the return of our reduced amount of funds in court under the point that they have breached that agreement ?

 

3. Is there any thing else we can do to facilitate the return of our funds ?

 

Thank you for your help

 

Orbi

Link to post
Share on other sites

name and shame please

 

I've never heard of a DMC being no win no fee mind?

 

or do you mean this is one of these spoof companies

that claim to be able to write debts off?

 

have you the contract?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello dx100uk

 

He is a debt adjuster/ financial mediator who said he will help us come to a full and final settlement with our creditors

and he will take over liaising with them because we were being harassed for payment

which we couldn't make because our financial situation changed drastically.

 

I would love to expose him fully but I need to get the money back first as I don't have much knowledge of the law

and I understand that going to court will be very expensive

and he has already said that he will 'defend robustly' and seek full compensation.

 

I am at the moment struggling to keep a roof over my family's head and stop being repossessed,

so I suppose I am in a fearful state.

 

We have the contract and over 200 letters/emails.

 

I tried talking to some solicitors but obviously they require a hefty deposit in their account first.

 

I complained to the Financial Ombudsman last year hence the reduced settlement he offered,

but as I now understand the 6 months in which I had to go back to the Financial Ombudsman has expired

so I have to start the process again.

 

I also found out that if this carries on for 6 years then he doesn't have to give us our money back.

 

I must admit I am going round and round in circles and can't think straight

and in this state trying to take him to court I don't think I'd do very well.

 

I'd really appreciate it if you could point me in the right direction.

 

Thanx

 

Orbi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...