Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fredrickson International and identity fraud


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3753 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I came across this form by googling my situation and found some people who had similar (but not identical) issues. I was wondering if the community would be kind enough to give me some specific advice on my current situation.

 

Last month I received a letter from Fredrickson International Ltd. stating "information has been received confirming that your address details have changed to this address" and asking me to call them immediately for more information.

 

I had never heard of the company before so put it down as a fishing [problem] and ignored it.

 

Later that month I received a second letter from Fredrickson International Ltd.

stating that I owed the company 'Marisota' over £200.

 

Again I had never even heard of Marisota until this letter (they appear to be a womens clothing company) and am not even sure how someone was able to purchase from their store on my behalf without using a credit card? This is still a mystery to me.

 

Anyway, they said they were considering legal action and that I should immediately pay them the money.

 

Yesterday I sent them the 'prove it' letter that I believe is hosted on this helpful website.

 

Today (obviously before they have received my prove it letter)

I received a letter from Bryan Carter Solicitors LLP saying I must contact Fredrickson within the next 14 days

to organise repayment, failing which they will issue proceedings against me.

They further insist that I call Fredricksons on an 0845 number.

 

From reading this forum I understand that calling any of these companies is dangerous

and all discourse should be made in writing to avoid being screwed over.

 

What is my next action?

 

Should I ignore this?

 

Am I 100% safe knowing that I never spent this money

(not being a woman and rarely buying clothes I am definitely not forgetting something here).

 

Is this all scare tactics from a shark to get me to pay money I do not owe?

 

Is it possible that someone has fraudulently used perhaps a bank statement delivered to an old address?

 

If so will I have to pay this money?

 

Any information would be fantastic,

especially as I appear to have a 14 day counter on my head for this.

 

Thanks

 

Nathan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm this, the letter I sent was recorded delivery and addressed to their PO Box. Also I'm not 100% sure this is the correct sub-forum, please move this post accordingly if there is a more suited sub. Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi welcome aboard

 

usual tactics from this lot.

 

they all sit next to each other

spoofing you into thinking its going up a chain of severity

 

its NOT.

 

the carter letter will not say WILL anywhere

read it carefully

 

if, may might, could, instructed never WILL.

 

if you think its fraud

 

give actionfraud a ring

 

as for carter

 

send them a CCA request.

£1 BLANK PO

 

do NOT sign the letter

 

probably because you phoned them?

they think you are a mug to be fleeced now.

 

don't ever phone a dca nor their fake/tame solicitors.

 

keep us informed

 

have you checked your credit file [see below]

 

if its been done once id expect more fraud too

 

get the file and check its not been trashed

and that old address shows

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks so much for your response.

 

I have not called them yet and was not intending on doing so as I read on this forum why that is a bad idea while I was initially considering it

(I'm a bit phone phobic too so am always reluctant to call strangers).

 

I will send the letter to Carter,

though I'm reluctant to spend any money on anything to do with this issue

as I feel other than them harassing me it's nothing to do with me.

£1 doesn't sound too steep though if it's entirely necessary.

 

Is noddle the correct place to look to check my credit file?

 

If it makes any difference I no longer have a personal bank account, only a joint one with my wife.

 

Thanks again for your advice, I really appreciate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

for things of that age noddle will be perfect

 

you'll need a card to verify on any of them mind

 

debit will do.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also I reported it using Action Frauds online form. They advised me that since no money has been lost that they couldn't really do anything other than keep the form for reference.

 

I think I can do the digital sig. myself in photoshop.

 

Would sending them the £1 for the CCA request be payed by cheque? If so am I at risk of giving away further details this way?

And just to confirm should I be sending this to Fredrickson or Carter?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

crter

 

don't use a cheque

 

it'll have you sig on it

the main reason for a blank PO

 

is that they usually say or fwd it to the original creditor

yto waste your time

 

so totally nlank PO

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

could even be 2nd class if you give them 12+4 working days

 

up to you

 

doesn't need to be recorded at all.

 

when you get the PO

you could get free proof of posting too!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...