Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tax and national insurence


fatbelly 1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3739 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Fatbelly, Looking in as asked ...............

 

I have 2 suggestions :-

 

1. Call the number from where the letter came to get some info.

 

2. I would get down to the Jobcentre and ask them to explain the decision. Take your last few payslips, a copy of your P45 and your last 2 P60's with you.

 

It's very unusual for an employer to make deductions and NOT pay them over as required, particularly since the introduction of the "Real Time" PAYE deductions reporting system came in last year.

 

Failure by an employer to pay over any tax or NIC on time, or at all, is taken very seriously by HMRC.

 

 

Can you tell us:-

 

Were you the only employee or were there several, or many.

 

How long had you worked there approx.

 

What did you earn gross each week or month approx.

 

Did your payslips show tax and NIC being deducted each month.

 

:-)

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fatbelly,

 

Given what you say about the level of your earnings, I cannot see why DWP would say you've not paid enough NIC.

 

Can you confirm exactly what their letter says about this.

 

Also, from what you say, I think it unlikely the employer has not been paying over the PAYE deductions. It's possible this happened in the last month or so before the Co went under. But I'd be very surprised if this went on, unnoticed, for any significant time.

 

In any event, if you can show that deductions were taken and you were paid the Net amount each week, HMRC should not penalise you, even in the unlikely event that the PAYE deductions were not paid to HMRC as required.

 

Don't wind yourself up calling the NI Helpline. Answer about what the letter says and we'll take it from there.

 

:-)

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fatbelly,

 

A P46 will not apply here yet - that comes into play when you start a new job and have no P45.

 

On reading the text from DWP's letter, I think they are saying :-

 

You have no good reason for the delay in making your claim so we can't back-date it from 6th Dec'r to 27th Jan.

 

Accordingly we cannot credit you with NIC for the same period.

 

What I don't yet understand, and what you need to query at the Jobcentre, is their statement that you don't qualify for JSA from 28th Jan onwards due to insufficient NI Class 1 contributions.

 

Ask them why this is so, and ask if their records show that you paid NIC Class 1 in 20121/12 of £xxx and 2012/13 of £xx, as per your P60's.

 

This should tell you if the employer was paying over the PAYE deducted as necessary.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...