Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

FOS Leaflet


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3768 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Anything we can help you with rebel !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB

 

I lodged a complaint with Halifax late 2012, complaining to senior managers at various levels regarding information they have provided. The Halifax's 'Final Response' was a computer generated credit card statement.

 

I expected to be sent a 'letter' not a computer generated credit card statement.

 

I don't recall receiving an FOS leaflet, that's irrelevant as I should have received a 'letter'.

 

The correct format for a 'Final Response' as described in the DISP is a letter complying with the Rules set out in the DISP 1.6.2.

 

http://fshandbook.info/FS/html/handbook/DISP/1/6

 

My complaint to the FOS is out of time, over 6 month. (I believe I have exceptional circumstances besides DISP).

The Halifax has raised an objection as it believes the following rule applies, DISP Rule 2.8.2. (out of time Rule).

 

The FOS adjudicator believes that on the balance of probabilities the Halifax did send a 'Final Response Letter'. This is easily clarified with a SAR request. The 'Letter' does not exist, only a computer generated credit card statement.

 

The FOS think this is about enforceability, but it's about information, the agreement is unenforceable.

 

In a bizarre twist I sent Halifax the same complaint in October 2013, the Halifax responded by stating that the FOS had looked into the matter in 2012 and found in Halifax's favour. The complaint with the FOS was lodged in October 2013 so that is not possible.

 

Halifax make stuff up, they present the made up stuff in court and to me, when they get caught out, they can't answer the questions in my complaints.

 

 

Anything we can help you with rebel !
Edited by rebel11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Was your response from the FOS, via a first tier adjudicator or the Ombudsman, Rebel.. If the former, then I think you need to push it up the ladder.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB

 

It was from the first tier adjudicator, complained to the CEO like yesterday, a very quick response, informed that I need to provide them with exceptional circumstances for the first complaint 2012 because Halifax objected due to being out of time, I'll do that. They are opening up a new case file for complaint October 2013 as that's within the the six month time limit.

 

Apparently Halifax can write a 'final response', they don't have to send it out. It is for the consumer to get hold of a copy. That is my understanding of what I've been told. According to the FCA.

 

Was your response from the FOS, via a first tier adjudicator or the Ombudsman, Rebel.. If the former, then I think you need to push it up the ladder.
Edited by rebel11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB

 

It was from the first tier adjudicator, complained to the CEO like yesterday, a very quick response, informed that I need to provide them with exceptional circumstances for the first complaint 2012 because Halifax objected due to being out of time, I'll do that. They are opening up a new case file for complaint October 2013 as that's within the the six month time limit.

 

Apparently Halifax can write a 'final response', they don't have to send it out. It is for the consumer to get hold of a copy. That is my understanding of what I've been told. According to the FCA.

 

 

Well now that has to be the most bizarre statement I have heard from the regulators ?

 

How the hell are you supposed to know that they have written a final response and be able to act on it within the 6 month time frame if it is never posted to you !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB

 

Has to be a bizarre answer, 'Antenna Headband', cheap, they can send a signal across the airwaves :madgrin:

 

Well now that has to be the most bizarre statement I have heard from the regulators ?

 

How the hell are you supposed to know that they have written a final response and be able to act on it within the 6 month time frame if it is never posted to you !

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other thing to note is that the LETTER ITSELF must mention Ombudsman Referral Rights - merely including a leaflet is insufficient - The FCA Handbook definition for a rejected complaint is as follows

 

"a written response from the firm which" ......"rejects the complaint and gives reasons for doing so and which informs the complainant that if he remains dissatisfied with the firm's response he may now refer his complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service and do so within six months" .

 

In your position, I would ask that this case is referred to a jurisdiction ombudsman although given the delays with such cases it may be quicker for the subsequent complaint to be investigated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andybars.

 

The other thing to note is that the LETTER ITSELF must mention Ombudsman Referral Rights - merely including a leaflet is insufficient - The FCA Handbook definition for a rejected complaint is as follows

 

"a written response from the firm which" ......"rejects the complaint and gives reasons for doing so and which informs the complainant that if he remains dissatisfied with the firm's response he may now refer his complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service and do so within six months" .

 

In your position, I would ask that this case is referred to a jurisdiction ombudsman although given the delays with such cases it may be quicker for the subsequent complaint to be investigated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...