Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Question re RBS Settlement Letter


madmels
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6396 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They have agreed by letter (dated 18/10/06) offering as a gesture of goodwill after I refused their first offer. It states that their terms and conditions will continue to apply and any future charges in the absence of bank error will apply.

 

Received letter from their legal department today (dated 20/10/06) referring to the court action I've raised. Stating the bank does not accept that it has any liability to you in law or that your claim has any prospects succeeding in court.

 

Both letters are from different people and different addresses. Kinda confused as to what to make of both letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Madmels.

I havent hand much experience in teh Scotland section.

 

the procedure in other banks would be...

 

If you want to take the new offer cross and adjust the sentences that make terms and conditions.

 

so it reads you accept but with no terms and conditions.

 

Make a copy, send a copy of the adjusted offer and your acceptance and send it to the legal section.

 

you could phone the legal section if you wanted to, and advise you have an offer you are happy with but only with out conditions. ( but still send letter to back up your conversation)

 

Either way you are holding an offer, it still gets deducted from your amount of claim, while you persue the rest.

Or

You accept and close the claim once you have the settlement cash.

 

i will request for your post to be moved to the Royal Bank of Scotland Section. then you can get soem more feedback form other users.

 

Bl:)

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I still send it to the legal section although the adjusted offer didn't come from the legal section, it came from the customer relations unit and it's the full amount that I claimed that they are offering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think no matter who sent it the bank have offered it, its an offer in writing, can't see how they can go back on it now, maybe they could say its not offered with out conditions. thats something only you can consider accepting.

 

If its the full amount then give legal a ring and tell them you have the offer, it will shut them up, id love to be in your shoes :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

Standard stuff I think, some add more conditions than this when making an offer i.e. add in a confidentiality clause or say you won't make any further claims, but they are never going to drop charges unless they are made too. Don't see that these conditions make any difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a quick note....even if you agree to future charges, you can still go on to claim them back as this is your basic right under law and you cant sign that away.

 

That said, why bother complicating things? Just score out the conditions and return the form. Chances are you will get the cheque anyway as they wont want this to go any further.

 

or......

 

You could just play cute and not return it at all and just ask them when the money will be in your account. Once its in, then return it.

 

Just a few options, but dont forget that para 1 above still applies.

 

J

1/9/06 RBS claim #1

8/11/06 - claim settled

17/11 claim #2 started - incl creditcard

30/11 - CC statements received

31/11 - Prelims issued - RBS paying up, only M/C to go)

 

If any of my advice/ info has been helpful, please click the scales:D

 

Please also remember that any advice is given from my own experience and in good faith as a lay person. If in doubt, please contact a qualified professional:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...