Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My overall Benefits journey from 2013 to date - and on going still!!


Guest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just found this article. While it doesn't deal specifically with ATOS it does shed light on the recording in private places-Hospitals or doctors surgery being the one here

 

http://www.hsj.co.uk/resource-centre/best-practice/secret-audio-recordings-know-the-law/1332221.article

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 697
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think this thread may be confusing overt and covert recordings. Anyone has the right to refuse to be recorded-if they know about it. (obviously not if you are being recorded under caution) The difference is that with a covert recording, the assessor has no knowledge of this and as such cannot object.

 

The recording itself cannot be used without the assessors permission (which I would say would be unlikely forthcoming) however a transcript could be made and so long as the assessors name is redacted, I would see no legal 'wrong' as there would be no personal information other than the claimants. The assessor is unlikely to offer personal information in any interview and if they did, that could also be redacted from the transcript.

 

As the recording would be for personal use, the DPA would not come into play however, if the recording was passed to a third party then s36 would come into play.

 

Council meetings are already recorded, either physically or by a stenographer. Courts I would imagine are covered by legal privilege and of course the contempt laws could also be used.

 

A few years ago, I worked as a security guard in shopping centre and an elderly couple were taking photographs and were asked to stop as they didn't have permission. They were quite openly taking the pictures but if I were to do the same but covertly, they wouldn't know about it and therefore not be able to do anything about it.

  • Haha 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi

This, to me, is a serious breach of data protection so possibly a two pronged approach here.

 

1 A formal written complaint and sent by snail mail to the benefits section outlining what they have done wrong (not updating addresses-sending to wrong address)

 

2 Another complaint to the Data Compliance manager detailing what the benefits section has done.

 

I say two pronged because it is usual for one department to have no communication with another.

 

Include photocopies of the envelope and ask your neighbour if she will agree to back up the statement:

 

they told her to open it

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...