Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help RPL problem dont know where to go


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4009 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello guys, you've provided useful info in the past with regards to a case I had posted here awhile ago with regards to exorbitant bailiff fees,

 

so how about this for a story...

 

I popped into Tesco's store a couple of weeks ago and in my bag I had a blu-ray disc (which I was going to watch at my brothers)

and another blu-ray I was going to post.

 

After searching their shelves for a jiffy bag, I did the rest of my shopping and left.

 

As I was leaving the store I was accosted by 3 staff who immediately asked to see my bag!

When I showed them what I had they immediately seized the disc (even with the receipt that was inside) and asked that I go with them.

I told them to return my property, however the 3 of them surrounded me and proceeded to frogmarch me to a back room against my express wishes...

 

They continued to bully and accuse me and said the whole event was filmed on CCTV,

however they could not see when and how I had possibly removed the red security tags,

so if I did not want to pay for the items they would consider further legal action!?

 

I continued to protest my innocence and continually requested that the police attend

- during my two hour imprisonment I had to wait 45mins to use the toilet and I was not even allowed to smoke

or call for assistance on my phone (they made sure there was no reception in that area).

 

Once the police arrived,

I asked to speak to the officers alone and explained that I had entered the store with those discs

and that they belonged to me (I even had the receipts to prove this) and that there was no way for those red tags to have been removed

and the police search verified I carried nothing capable of doing this;

 

I even told the officers that as a security precaution most if not all of my discs have a security mark upon them, even if they're unopened..

 

. After the police spoke with Tesco's they declined to press any charges, and the police decided to not proceed any further as Tesco had now seized my discs!!!

 

I have now received a letter from RLP alleging that Tesco now seek compensation of between £500-800 for their loss,

but will consider a final payment of £183 to settle the matter without further civil litigation.

 

So what should I do now,

the police say its a civil matter and if I want my discs back I need to take Tesco to court,

however RLP now want to claim money from me for the inconvenience of my false imprisonment and the seizure of my own personal property???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alchemy. It would prob be better if you started your own thread. Im sure you already know what advice we will give ! Dont pay ! If i was in your shoes i would write a single letter to them, outlining that nothing was stolen and that the police were satisfied with this and that you would be calling them as witnesses if rlp are dumb enough to initiate proceedings. Also point put that you are totally innocent and that any further letters from rlp will be deemed as harrasment.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah man the general advice here is do not pay :) im yet to recieve any further letters from them but hey my event was like 4 days ago so im not counting myself out just yet. stay strong if you want your belongings back ask for them and say youll be pursuing your own case if they are not returned to you. dont be bullied by rlp :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get DCA@s hounding you, TELL the DCA there is no debt and to get lost. Then file a full complaint with the OFT, informing them that the DCA is harassing you for a non existent debt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOr RLP letters, they usualy come after 2-3 weeks, and each one gets more and more desperate, and more importantly, each one contains more and more lies and misleading information.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What should be ignored? EVERY SINGLE THING YOU GET FROM RLP. Come on. Read what they sent to alchemy.

 

I have now received a letter from RLP alleging that Tesco now seek compensation of between £500-800 for their loss,

but will consider a final payment of £183 to settle the matter without further civil litigation.

 

jackie is getting more and more desperate every day.

 

Reading their website, you have to laugh at their "court claims" as well.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strewth, thanks for all the help.

 

The morning after the event, I even went to Tesco HQ in Cheshunt to complain about the 'naziesque' treatment I had the night before and requested a copy of the CCTV images, and strangely enough they didn't have it!? Even stranger was that their inventory didn't even have those 2 discs as being in stock, so they queried as to why it was the staff took them.

 

As far as the police are concerned its now a civil matter, and as RLP seem to have opened that door I've contemplated replying that I'm willing to attend court and will be seeking punitive damages from both parties (Tesco's and RLP) for seizure theft of personal property, contravening data protection by issuing my details to 3rd parties and for my unlawful detainment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sucks man, yeah i agree fight for your rights but make sure its worth fighting because theyl play sneaky. im still waiting on my next response from rpl but im not worrying too much. it might be best to ignore rpl but if you have a defendable case then go for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strewth, thanks for all the help.

 

The morning after the event, I even went to Tesco HQ in Cheshunt to complain about the 'naziesque' treatment I had the night before and requested a copy of the CCTV images, and strangely enough they didn't have it!? Even stranger was that their inventory didn't even have those 2 discs as being in stock, so they queried as to why it was the staff took them.

 

As far as the police are concerned its now a civil matter, and as RLP seem to have opened that door I've contemplated replying that I'm willing to attend court and will be seeking punitive damages from both parties (Tesco's and RLP) for seizure theft of personal property, contravening data protection by issuing my details to 3rd parties and for my unlawful detainment.

 

Dont reply to them at all. Seriously, its not worth playing letter tennis with them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...