Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bluestone Credit Management & Moto Novo


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I have just joined the forum and I am hoping to get a bit of advice.

 

I did a VT on my car 04 April, all my payments were up to date with no missed payments.

 

The car was inspected and was found to have £40 of paint damage which I accepted.

 

However they are trying to charge me £1664 for excess milage.

 

I have so refused to pay this amount, but as a gesture of goodwill I offered then 1/3 of this which was £550 but they refused.

 

However they have now passed this on to Bluestone who said they will accept £832 to settle the amount.

 

Have Bluestone any legal course to recover the money from me, despite me not agreeing to the excess milage?

 

Had a lady call me this morning, I must admit she was very charming & nice but I guess that is there job to get you to pay.

 

Not sure what course of action to take!

 

I said that I will go to court and dispute this, then she said if I don't pay then Bluestone will take me to court blah, blah, blah.

 

I have been strong up to now, but can feel myself starting to buckle!

 

Shall I hang in there?

 

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Were you told a specific point where a charge for excess mileage charges would kick in and what the charging scale would be, imo this would have to be on the original contract, do you have a copy?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I have the credit agreement, but no reference to mileage is on the agreement - But Moto Novo say it is in THEIR terms & conditions which I have never seen!

I think they are trying to pull a fast one - it was a HP agreement not a Lease contract.

First they tried telling me that the proceeds from auction of the car would be taken off the milage charge - their letters have all been contradictory!

 

Thanks for replying so quick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you are correct, Moto Novo are on the make, the challenge is that no Ts & Cs were ever provided to you at any time.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks, the terms & conditions I have never seen, All I signed was my credit agreement which makes no reference to excess milage.

Also I wrote them the initial letter on 04 April terminating my agreement, so is the agreement terminated on that date? Moto Novo are trying to tell me different?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imo the agreement was terminated by you on 4th April.

 

I think a Formal Complaint is needed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before going to the ombudsman you need to exhaust the creditors complaints procedure, once you have a 'final response'' and if that is unsatisfactory you can the go to FOS.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no specific template for this but I can draft one for you later today if you wish?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just need a few pointers really!

 

I terminated my agreement on 04 April, the outstanding balance owing on the car was £4500, this amount is STILL showing on my credit record, it is not showing as default just outstanding which is not correct because as far as I am concerned I owe nothing.

 

Moto Novo said if I didn't pay the excess milage charge they place a delinquent default on my account - can they do this?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you could draft one for me then I would be extremely grateful!

 

OK Steve it's on the list!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am away from home, will draft letter when I get a break this am.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve have 30 min break will read through again the post.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have just joined the forum and I am hoping to get a bit of advice.

 

I did a VTA on my car 04 April, all my payments were up to date with no missed payments.

The car was inspected and was found to have £40 of paint damage which I accepted.

However they are trying to charge me £1664 for excess milage.

I have so refused to pay this amount, but as a gesture of goodwill I offered then 1/3 of this which was £550 but they refused.

However they have now passed this on to Bluestone who said they will accept £832 to settle the amount.

Have Bluestone any legal course to recover the money from me, despite me not agreeing to the excess milage?

Had a lady call me this morning, I must admit she was very charming & nice but I guess that is there job to get you to pay.

Not sure what course of action to take!

I said that I will go to court and dispute this, then she said if I don't pay then Bluestone will take me to court blah, blah, blah.

I have been strong up to now, but can feel myself starting to buckle!

Shall I hang in there?

 

Thanks for your help

 

Ok Steve this goes to Moto Novo and Bluestone get proof of posting or recorded/signed for.

 

Ref: use theirs.

 

FORMAL COMPLAINT:/LETTER BEFORE ACTION.

Sir/Madam,

 

I refer to recent communications regarding the over limit mileage charges that have been in regard to the voluntary termination of agreement number xxxxxxxxx, the sum of £1664.00 claimed for this has not been properly explained to me, although I have made a generous offer as gesture of goodwill which was rejected Bluestone have offered to settle for £832.00 however no explicit breakdown of how this amount has been arrived at has been made, therefore my offer is withdrawn.

 

As I have verbally confirmed to Bluestone that I WILL if necessary pursue this through the court you will now consider this as a LETTER BEFORE ACTION.

 

I trust now that Blustone and Moto Novo will reconsider their position on this, as I see it if a court action is raised there is no defence open to either company.

 

OK Steve?

 

The Following points must be addressed within 14 days of the date hereon to prevent litigation.

 

1. No explanation as to how this charge has arisen has been given.

2. I have a copy of the original contract to hand, and there is NO clause referring to an ''over limit mileage charge''.

3. Moto Novo has stated that such a provision is included in its terms & Conditions.

4. These terms and conditions have not been provided to me in any form.

5. This terms and condition were not mentioned at any time until this dispute arose.

6.Given the information above this matter is formally in dispute.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This lot are the most awkward bunch I've come across in a long time.

 

 

I guess the default was 'in the pipeline' when the letter was sent, looking forward to their response!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so I include the 6 points at the bottom then?

 

 

shall I mention the default placed on my credit files?

 

Ahh I see the letters not gone yet.

 

Add this after the 6 points.

 

I am now aware of a default entry placed by Moto Novo on my credit reference files, this must be removed as I believe that Moto Novo have no authority to mark my files.

 

I suggest that you place a notice of dispute on the CRA files.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your help - here is the letter i sent today - what do you think?

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Agreement no. xxxxxxxx Reg No: xxxxxxxx

 

 

FORMAL COMPLAINT :/ Letter before action

 

 

I refer to recent communications regarding the over limit mileage charges that have been in regard to the voluntary termination of agreement number xxxxxxxx, the sum of £1664.00 claimed for this is totally unjustified. Although I have made a generous offer as a gesture of goodwill which was rejected, Bluestone have offered to settle for £832.00 however no explicit breakdown of how this amount has been arrived at has been made, therefore my offer is withdrawn.

 

As I have verbally confirmed to Bluestone that I WILL if necessary pursue this through the court, you will now consider this as a LETTER BEFORE ACTION.

 

I trust now that Moto Novo Finance and Bluestone will reconsider their position on this. As I see it if court action is initiated there is no defence open to either company.

 

With reference to your letter of 09 April 2013 regarding my ‘liability is limited to the amount to settle the agreement’, may I point out that the agreement was terminated on 03 April 2013 and was NOT subject to proceeds from the sale of the vehicle.

 

The Following points must be addressed within 14 days of the date hereon to prevent litigation.

 

1. No explanation as to how this charge has arisen has been given.

2. I have a copy of the original contract to hand, and there is NO clause referring to an ‘overlimit’ charge.

3. Moto Novo has stated that such a provision is included in its terms & Conditions.

4. These terms and conditions have not been provided to me in any form.

5. This terms and condition were not mentioned at any time until this dispute was raised which was AFTER the agreement was terminated by me on 04 April 2013.

6. Given the information above this matter is formally in dispute.

7. I am now aware of a default entry placed by Moto Novo on my credit reference files, this must be removed as I believe that Moto Novo have no authority to place incorrect information on them.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...