Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

lowell


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3985 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I think this could be a new tactic from these pond dwellers

 

My partner has been receiving phone calls from 01133086000 chasing a debt from about 10 years ago we think it was for a captal one credit card

The limit was £250.00 at the time to which my partner was paying it off monthly charges were getting added each month because they were saying it was not getting paid in early enough for clear funds.

 

Anyway she paid what she owed without the add ons and left it at that.

 

She has not spoke on the phone to anyone or had any dealings with Capital one or Lowell so these phone calls have come out of the blue.

 

Today she got a letter from Lowell saying

 

Dear Miss xxxxx

 

We wrote to you recently after answering a query you raised on your account and offered you the opportunity to pay monthly by Direct Debit. We even gave you two alternative repayment options or the ability to dictate what you wanted to pay, but unfortunately your account remains unpaid and you have not set up a monthly repayment plan.

 

The debt they say is now £1277.71

 

This is utter make believe we have not been in touch with them or anyone as we did not know about this debt

Is this a way to get around statute barred debts by saying we got in touch with them.

 

Any help would be helpful

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the last payment or written acknowledgement of the debt was more than six years ago (5 in Scotland) then this is Statute Barred.

 

If that is the case there is Statute Barred template letter in the CAG library which you can use to get these people off your back. The library link is at the top of every CAG page in green.

 

Be prepared that they may come back and say a payment was made on x date. If you know very well that no such payment was made then it will be up to them to prove that payment was made by you. It is not unknown for this type of company to come up with phantom payments.

 

When once a debt is SB then it cannot be unbarred, even by the courts.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting development. If you don’t lodge a denial, they say you acknowledge the fact. If you deny it, they have you as a ‘live’ one and bombard you.

 

When was the last payment made on this – is it SB? Given the age and likely time it was defaulted, I’d be surprised if it showed on your credit record.

 

If it is SB, and/or the letter can proven to be a lie (NOT an ‘admin error’), we’ll concoct the mother of all nasty responses for you, and get the OFT involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you do any checks on that? It’s best to be sure of any last payment or acknowledgment date before you use the SB letter.

 

Have you moved home over this period? Any chance letters could have gone elsewhere?

 

This is sounding straightforward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so hiding in full view, as they say, ie. no question that you can be accused of avoidance.

 

Try and establish the last payment date. If you can check your accounts back even a little over six years and there’s nothing there, and there has been no other communication with the OC, you will know you’re safe to send the SB letter.

 

We can adapt it to include a complaint about the deliberately misleading letter, and copy it to the OFT and Trading Standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A very devious letter.

 

If you have checked you bank accounts, and can find no payment to anyone regarding this, and you are sure the last activity was in 2003, then I would adapt the SB letter to include a complaint about their misleading letter. Copy it to Trading Standards and the OFT.

 

If you want to cause them aggro, and only if you can record calls, you should phone them and ask what’s going on, then listen to the fibs...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an aside for any other members reading - you'll notice in the link to the letter that pop has provided that Lowell request the setting up of a Direct Debit - if a DCA asks for this - don't do it. If you genuinely believe you owe the debt, a standing order is far better. It costs you nothing and you remain in control of how much money leaves your account. It has been reported in the past that some DCAs have increased Direct Debit amounts without the prior consent of the debtor and even carried on taking installments after Direct Debits have been cancelled.

 

In this case pop - take the guys' advice. Sounds Statute Barred to me - a complaint is also advisable due to the misleading manner in which their letter is worded.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's almost certainly statute barred but even if it isn't they almost certainly won't have the credit agreement. I have never, in all my time here, heard of anyone receiving a copy of their actual credit agreement for a Capital One account from the early 2000s. Capital One absolutely do not want anyone to see those agreements, even if they do still have them. Lowells, etc., will come up with reconstructed agreements which couldn't possibly have been sent out at the time, and all sorts of other stuff, but never the actual original agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement Lowell sent me from Capital One was simply an "application Form" and headed as such. Unenforceable on many points.

I told them exactly that and they closed the account.

Hopefully you'll find your situation is pretty much the same!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement Lowell sent me from Capital One was simply an "application Form" and headed as such. Unenforceable on many points.

I told them exactly that and they closed the account.

Hopefully you'll find your situation is pretty much the same!

 

 

Wow! They actually sent you the application form? All they would send me was the signature box, with nothing else on the page at all.

 

They closed my account as well, but they did try a few shenanigans along the way before they threw in the towel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have just received an email from Lowell chasing a debt from 2003. This is the 3rd debt Lowell have chased me for which is "statute barred". When I called them to find out what it was and eventually when I could confirm what it was for I merely advised them that this is statute barred and that they should not be chasing me for it. The lady at Lowell said I understand that it is barred but she has a "duty" to see if I morally wanted to pay for it!!!!

 

So be aware folks, check to see if it is state barred before paying it as you do not have to and it will not be shown on your credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowell Reference Number:*xxxccc

 

Original Account Number:*xxxxcccc

 

Original Company: Capital One

 

Account Balance: £1277.71

 

Dear Ms Andrea Evans,

 

A special offer for you, for a very limited period

 

To help you clear your debts. We'd like to offer you a discount of 75% off your outstanding balance AND, if you can't afford to pay it all at once, we can even set up a repayment plan and spread out the remaining balance so you can pay monthly.

 

It really is that simple, just follow these easy steps:

 

*1. Call us on*0113 308 6041*and tell us if you're paying in full or need to spread the payments

 

*2. Make the payment in full or setup a monthly Direct Debit for the instalments

 

Once the payments have been made the remaining balance will be cleared and the debt will no longer exist.

 

But, we do need to speak with you in the next 10 days to take advantage of this offer - even if you can't pay immediately. Don't worry, we won't ask you to pay any more, but we do need to update our system to stop any further action.

 

If you'd prefer, you can even email us atpost@lowellgroup.co.uk*to tell us how you'd like to pay.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Andrew Bartle

 

Chief Operations Officer

 

Lowell Financial Ltd

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject:*Re: The Lowell Group (Thread:8168)

 

*

 

To whom it may concern

 

*

 

Thank you for that amazing offer you must really be dragging the Bottom of the barrel

 

*

 

You have bought a debt for about 10 quid and are trying your luck

 

*

 

I do not owe any money to capital one or any other company

 

*

 

You are on a fishing trip trying to get a bite.*

 

*

 

I have not had any credit since before 2004 which is 9 years ago statute barred is 6 years have a nice day

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...