Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So sorry it's took me a few weeks to respond back to you. Thank you so much for your response. My grandfather is clear about the pension deductions on his pay slips.  As I mention before all these went missing in the burgarly. We have tried Willis Tower Watson but they were not to helpful. I am stuck what we can try next. Thank you again.     
    • As a rough guess it would be your landlord who would be responsible. But you need to understand the extent of your losses before you can begin any claim. This means that you need to list out any expenses to which you have been put, any expenses which would be associated with repairing damage or cleaning et cetera. And then list out the inconvenience to which you have been put as a result of this. Any actual expenses – money loss which has been incurred already all that is likely to be incurred in result of repairs will need an inspection and to quotations which eventually you will present to the landlord. Even if I'm wrong and it is not the landlord – you will still need the evidence that I have listed above in order to begin any claim.  
    • Hi, I have been renting a three bedroom, top floor flat for six years now in England. Just so you know, there is a letting agent, landlord and a block management company involved. Eighteen months ago we had a considerable leak in one of the bedrooms, affecting the next door bedroom as well but not as badly. This led to a lot of damage to the ceiling and the formation of mould within the first bedroom and to a lesser extent in the second bedroom. As far as we are aware, the leak has only recently been sorted by the block management company(who owns the roof etc…) Just over three weeks ago, a large inspection hole was cut into the ceiling, the workmen (instructed to come by block management) who undertook the work did not put any dust sheets down over any of the furniture, causing an incredible amount of dirt and debris throughout the entire flat, rendering the room unusable. We were left on a Friday afternoon with a gaping hole and no instruction as to what was going to happen next. Only after contacting our letting agent to inform them about the state of the bedroom had been left in, with a gaping hole and bits of debris falling, did they come to do a temporary fix to cover the hole which was after a week. As the bedroom is still unusable. My daughter has for more than three weeks been sleeping in the lounge. The letting agent did offer to get the place cleaned, but we see no point until the job has been completed. My landlord has reduced my rent by £200 for the past couple of months and is now wanting full rent regardless of the work being incomplete. A plan has been put in place, however, we have not been given a timeline for when these will be completed and this could take some considerable time. In addition to this, there was a leak in the kitchen but this was very minor, and we have a major condensation issue in the bathroom as the extractor fan is apparently not strong enough so the ceiling is covered in mould which is now being revealed as the paint is flaking off. The problem we have is that the building (roof etc..) is managed by a block management company. My letting agent has basically said that the damage is the responsibility of the block management and this nothing to do with the landlord, and therefore, does not want to give us any compensation. What are my rights as a tenant in this situation? Am I entitled to a continued rent reduction or additional compensation given the ongoing uninhabitable condition of the bedroom and the disruption this has caused? I have attached photos as supporting evidence and would be very grateful for your advice. https://imgur.com/a/yfm4FP9 Should you require any further information, please let me know. Thanks in advance! 😁👍
    • I have just read it again and I see that you say that you are going to be claiming for time and stress. This is not recoverable loss so I think that you should leave it out.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN- Bailiff pressure. Submitted TE7/TE9 and worried it may be rejected **Won**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2639 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please...read the LGO report and the other BPA document. When an OTT is filed I have never known a bailiff to continue enforcement BUT if he did then TEC would need to be advised and they will contact the LA for you.

 

The LGO report is vitally important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Re: bailiffs,

 

for instance from Monday evening, when the TEC have receieved my TE7/TE9....,what if a bailff did try to recover debts from me, what should I do in this situation? What if the Bailiffs just come to my house when I'm not in and tow away my car?

 

The way the system works is this: TEC receive your application. They instruct the local authority to place all enforcement on hold until the matter is dealt with. The local authority are immediately obliged to notify the bailiff to cease action until further notice.

 

As TT says, it is very rare for this process to fail, but in the unlikely event that it did, get on to the local authority at once and insist that they undo whatever steps the bailiff might have taken. It would be unlawful for them to do otherwise - assuming TEC have your forms and have relayed this to the local authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou tomtubby, I will read the LGO report ASAP

 

Say the TEC have received my TE7/TE9,do you think I should still forward on supporting documents? When sending proof of my address etc, how would I go about getting docs to prove the date I changed my address with the DVLA? Do I need to contact the DVLA for this?

 

Forget DVLA for the moment - they are nothing to do with this. The TE7 is there for applications which are late, which yours is. It is there to allow you to explain why it is late - that's all. It's not an appeal, and you don't have to mention the PCN or anything. Just explain why it was not submitted before the bailiff contacted you.

 

I don't think it's too late, if you email something now. Make it crystal clear what you are doing:

 

"Supplementary information to include with my TE7 application, submitted by post on x/x/2013. Please add this as an attachment. PCN number xxxxxx"

 

Then explain simply what happened. You moved on x date, and consequently received no correspondence on this matter. You received no notices in the post and were quite unaware that the enforcement process was underway until the bailiff contacted you.

 

Give your new address.

 

By way of proof, I would scan something like a rental agreement or morgage agreement - just one page showing the address and date it started. Alternatively, a bank statement or utility bill dated as early as possible after the house move. If you can't do that, refer them to the correspondence you sent in at the time, which verifies your story.

 

Hopefully they will attach all this to the file, and when the local authority get it, they will see the situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read the LGO and the BPA!!....Thankyou for sending me those. I can see the importance of them now and how the council has commited Maladministration. I will be phoning the TEC on monday to find out if my TE7 is in process yet.

 

I had an email from the LA on Friday in responce to the Formal complaint I made to them. There reply was that ultimately it was my fault as i didnt inform the DVLA. They have denied any knowledge of me contacting them, but as I suspected as when i contacted them it was already after they had sent me a charge certificate they have not even read my email and they refused to up date my address over the phone. Ive got proof of the email and ive got a telephone bill which proves that i phoned them to give my address but obviosly i didnt record the telephone converation at the time. In the letter they are also tryinmg to claim that they sent me info regarding making an application to the TEC, which is a blatant lie as i never received such things. They aslo claimed they emailed it to me and that there was a problem with the email address but its the same email they have used to contact me last friday!!!!

 

I replyed back asking what addresss was on the warrant. currently the address is now correct on the warrant but since they never updated my address i suspect they must not of done when they originally gave the warrant to the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

i moved address in february 2012.

 

I havent actually seen the warrant. I have a letter from the bailffs addressed to my current address, which was delivered on 9 Dec 2012 saying that they have a warrant from the tec etc.

 

The council say they sent the warrant to the bailiffs on 7 nov 2012, but the date the bailiffs first visited me was on the 9 dec, which is one month later, so the bailiffs were probably given my old address previously??

 

I phoned the TEC today. They received my TE7 and it was procesed last thursday. They said that it is too late for me to forward supporting evidence regarding it as it all needs to go together at the same time. They said i can forward it to them if i want but they said it wont go togther along with my TE7. They said i can send the evidence to the council instead to help them assess it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When TEC receive OTT's they send an email to the LA and a paper copy of your application is sent to the LA a few days later BY POST. Trying to send supporting evidence to TEC after the application has been submitted very rarely works.

 

I would suggest that you call TEC in the morning and ask them to confirm the address on the warrant. If it is your current address, ask TEC to confirm the date that the LA applied to reissue the warrant. Please post back in the morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I would suggest that you call TEC in the morning and ask them to confirm the address on the warrant. If it is your current address, ask TEC to confirm the date that the LA applied to reissue the warrant. Please post back in the morning." I concur - and strongly suggest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just contacted the TEC today...i was ill for the last couple of days as ive been in a car accident hence the delay, ....ok the TEC confirmed to me over the telephone that the LA did contact them when they realised they had the wrong address. The TEC then authorised the reissue of the warrant on the 29th Novemeber 2012. They didnt tell me the date in which the LA requested the re isuue of the warrant and she got very angry when i said the LA had requested a re issue of the warrant!!!! shall I phone them back and get this information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i phoned the tec back and asked then what date did the LA apply for a re issue of the warrant. the tec said the warrant had not been re issued since 7 nov 12. i then told him that the tec had just told me that they had authorised the re issue of the warrant on the 29 nov 12. they seem to be very defensive when i ask them questions about this. ..... so i said to him what address is on the warrant currently. instead of telling which adress is on the warrant, he started asking me what my current address was. i then said to please confirm the current address on the warrant as i asked the question first and he said to me i had to tell him my address first before he could give me any information. then the line got cut off due to bad reception. I will awaite for your responce now as im really confused. The LA clearly knew they had the wrong address and they did inform the TEC of this, then the TEC authorised the re isuuse of the warrant. .....now they are telling me that the warrant was not re issued????? ...confused!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My TE7 is in process. The TEC has confirmed to me that is was in process since last thursday , 4 April 13. and that the bailiffs cannot take any action whilst this is in procees which can take up to 6 weeks. phew!! I hope that my TE7 will be accepted. They also informed me that it is too late for me to forward on to them supporting documents as evidence as they have to be sent along with the form. At the time when i posted off my TE7 i wasnt aware i was able to enclose evidence otherwise I would of done. The TEC informed me that I can forward the evidence to the LA directly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done this and have been given conflicting information from the TEC regarding this. The first time I phoned then they said the TEC authorised the re issue of the warrant on the 29 Nov 12, due to the LA informing then that the address was incorrect.

 

the second time i phoned the TEC they said that the warrant has not been re issued since 7 november. I asked him to confirm to me which adress is on the warrant cuurently. He wouldnt confirm that to me until i confirmed my address first. He was like you tell me your address first!! he said he could not give me any more info until i told him what my address was. it all seemed very shady. ....i then got cut off due to bad recpetion. I will phone them back later on once ive had a responce and feedback from here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive just had an email from the LA today in response to my question of what address is on the warrant. i have copy and pasted it below as follows:-

 

The Warrant was registered to the address given to the Council by DVLA.

 

After bailiff action and confirmation that you no longer lived at the address provided the bailiff requested for the warrant to be re-issued to a different address they had obtained for the debtor and this was .......... The request for re-issue was received on 28/11/2012 and sent to the Traffic Enforcement Centre on the same day. The warrant was re-registered to the new address on 29/11/2012 and the bailiffs were informed on 05/12/2012 that the warrant was successfully re-issued to the new address.

 

Edited by shazbazz
Link to post
Share on other sites

shabazz please delete your address from the above post

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

shazbazz

 

I would suggest that you remove personal details from your email.

 

I am NOT happy as YET AGAIN another local authority have UNLAWFULLY applied to TEC to have the warrant reissued. This is simply dreadful and must be STOPPED by TEC.

Edited by tomtubby
Link to post
Share on other sites

He was told by the LA to respond to my formal complaint, which I made to the Council 4 weeks ago. I have since processed a TE7 since then on 2 April. I dont think he is personally responsible for reissuing the warrant. he has just responded to my complaint and tried to twist everything I have said to make me look to blame, but i dont think he would have re issed the warrant.

Edited by shazbazz
Link to post
Share on other sites

If nobody minds, I will send a PM to shazbazz as he really does need to send an email to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and hopefully this should be attached to his file when the matter of the Out of Time application is considered by the.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If nobody minds, I will send a PM to shazbazz as he really does need to send an email to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and hopefully this should be attached to his file when the matter of the Out of Time application is considered by the.

Go right ahead TT we understand the urgency of this and the flagrant disregard of the regulations by the council and their bailiffs.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you can edit your post still to remove your mobile number, just in case the wrong people see it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks done!

Great with TT on the case you should get this sorted OK

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2639 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...