Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's better to keep advice on the open forum for everyone's benefit. Maybe you could post up the correspondence in a single pdf document and cover up your personal details, reference numbers and so on? HB
    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.    Thank you for your time and help.  It is really appreciated.  I am quite honestly on the floor, I have been really ill, in hospital, had nearly 6 months off work and only been back full time a few weeks and now this.  The fact the company you pay large sums of money to look after you in a time of need is also behaving criminally just makes you want to give up.    
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Campaign against high insurance premiums for people with poor credit


neil6534
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I am seeking help from everyone.

 

Recently I had to get lots of quotes for car insurancelink3.gif and they were all pretty high.

I found out that the reason for this is due to my credit file and what credit risk I am deemed to be.

 

The insurance companies/brokers look at your credit file and then decide if you are a good or bad threat. If you are a bad threat then your premium will be higher than those with a good credit file.

 

This I feel is discrimination and an unfair pricing policy.

 

The insurance companies/brokers will look at your file to decide what premium is to be applied but do not reflect that you have made monthly payments without fail back on to your credit file. So in one hand they use your bad profile to exploit you and on the other they do not reflect your ability to pay back the monthly installments.

 

Even if you decide to pay in full on a one off payment you are still hit with a higher premium, the only difference being that you don't have to pay interestlink3.gif for paying monthly.

 

Any suggestions on who I can contact in the media to highlight this problem?

 

Please keep your suggestions relating to this problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My concern is that many people may be paying higher insurance premium due to incorrect information on their credit file, which they may be unaware of.

 

I think if someone is charged a higher premium as a result of information on their credit file they should be informed of this, otherwise it is unfair for someone to check their file every other day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i dont understand is why is it so high for people who pay in a lump sum? I understand credit checks for those drivers that want to pay monthly, but not for those who just want to pay it in one go. In that scenario, there is no reason at all to check a credit file.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following is from Association of British Insurers.

 

Bankruptcy, and credit scoring more generally, can be an indicator of risk and evidence shows that it is predictive of claims experience. Information collected by reference agencies to determine a credit score will typically include details of county court judgements (CCJs) and bankruptcy. As such, some – but not all – insurers use credit scores as one of several rating factors to determine risk, and a poorer credit history is likely to lead to a higher premium.

 

I don't agree with this, but someone probably needs to take them to court to get any change.

 

So If you had some difficulty with your finance, how does that make you a higher risk driver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most People with credit problems situation is brought abought by High Interest Payments, time to bring back people justice and private sittings with the perpatrators, and get rid of Regulators (Non Regulators) as they seem unable to do any sort of job, and just publish guidelines which are not enfirceable only recommended.

 

Like the non government who rather companies etc self regulate as the government know that to issue actual legislation would be ignored until something goes wrong!

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

The following is from Association of British Insurers.

 

Bankruptcy, and credit scoring more generally, can be an indicator of risk and evidence shows that it is predictive of claims experience. Information collected by reference agencies to determine a credit score will typically include details of county court judgements (CCJs) and bankruptcy. As such, some – but not all – insurers use credit scores as one of several rating factors to determine risk, and a poorer credit history is likely to lead to a higher premium.

 

I don't agree with this, but someone probably needs to take them to court to get any change.

 

So If you had some difficulty with your finance, how does that make you a higher risk driver.

 

Because the sad buggers think you stand a good chance of fraudulant claim,well if that is the case then they are pre-judging people which is a criminal offence, to my mind if that is the case.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Pay insurance by instalments is a form of credit and CRA checks have ways been done.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. I suppose when it comes to household insurance it makes a kind of sense.People with money problems are more likely to have an "accident" with a pot of paint when they need a new carpet, I suppose.

 

The connection with car insurance is a more tenuous one, I can't really see the justification for it affecting third party only policies for instance.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The credit records are checked on motor insurance especially if the insurance is to be paid for by instalments, it is well known that unscrupulous people will take insurance paid this way pay one or two instalments and cancel payment once they have the insurance certificate in their hands, if this happens insurers default the account within 7 days which will show on CRAs so it is needed to prevent a recurrence of this criminal act.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The credit records are checked on motor insurance especially if the insurance is to be paid for by instalments, it is well known that unscrupulous people will take insurance paid this way pay one or two instalments and cancel payment once they have the insurance certificate in their hands, if this happens insurers default the account within 7 days which will show on CRAs so it is needed to prevent a recurrence of this criminal act.

 

Surely if this were the case the CRA check would be done via the credit supplier, and reflect on the apr of the loan, not on the price of the policy.

 

Policies can be cancelled before they terminate of course.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

As most of the instalment apps are made online it is part of the insurance application often the insurer provides the credit themselves or via a subsidiary.

 

It is a crime prevention measure if the credit supplier was to allow such actions there would be further repercussions.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As most of the instalment apps are made online it is part of the insurance application often the insurer provides the credit themselves or via a subsidiary.

 

It is a crime prevention measure if the credit supplier was to allow such actions there would be further repercussions.

 

Not sure what you mean here, I can see that the cost of the credit would increase based on the credit score, but struggle to see the criminal connection.

I know from experience that if a payment arrangement on car insurance is breached the just cancel the policy.

Police check all insurance through a central data-base to prevent fraud, they do not just take the document at face value.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok quite simply the payment of motor insurance by instalments has been widely abused, payments being stopped once the driver has the insurance certificate, so the insurers and credit providers work together a s such criminal activity will certainly have consequential costs which will be passed on by higher insurance premiums.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just goggled this.

 

http://www.gmacinsurance.com/legal/creditfaq.asp

 

2. Why do insurers use credit?

 

Auto insurance companies use financial history along with other factors (such as years of driving experience) to properly classify an insured according to his/her potential risk. Numerous studies have shown a very strong correlation between a consumer's financial history and his/her future insurance loss potential. Thus, auto insurance companies believe the use of credit helps to underwrite an applicant at a cost that most accurately reflects that particular applicant's specific risk.

 

Seems like a statistical relationship

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, I think that the meaning of this thread is becoming a bit lost.

 

The problem is that no matter how you search or get your car insurance, who ever is the provider uses a credit score to determine your premium prior to any choice of a lump sum payment or monthly payments being chosen.

 

When I researched my current insurance my premium came out at around £490. When I changed the following details on the quote form the insurance came out at approx £350.

All I changed was;

Drivers name to my girlfriends

drivers age

all other details such as the car being driven, miles driven per year, accidents and claims, no claims bonus etc were all kep the same. So on the basis that they no longer use gender as a means of setting a premium (in this case it would have been beneficial to be a female) the only conclusion is that the premium is set according to your credit score.

 

The premium is calaculated prior to what ever payment plan you chose.

 

I spoke to my insurance provider and they confirmed this!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes apparently someone has discovered a correlation between the credit rating of an applicant and the prospective claims that will be made against their policy.

Premiums have been weighed to reflect the additional risk.

 

Insurers take many factors into account, I wasn't aware of this one , but it seem to make quite a difference. I am not sure what you can do about it, they will argue that their research and statistical analysis are accurate, and they probably are.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...