Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Replying to above  this was on the day that two store detectives approached me and my friend and took us into the back room and spoke to us when they explained they have been watching
    • as my learned friend above...and.. sadly because just like DCA's and initially yourself in this case, you believed they have some magical powers ...they DON'T. 85% of people blindly pay DCA's cause they know no better and think they are BAILIFFS. only the RETAILER can ever do court and none have done this on a silly member of joe public that did something stupid since the infamous 2012 Oxford case on retail loss. BAILIFFS can only ever be involved after you've been to court and lost a CCJ, fat chance re above... and anyway, no BAILIFF has any right of forced entry anyway on consumer debts even with a judgement so......... stop panicking and thinking everything that doesn't apply.. forget about them but p'haps a confidential GP visit might be a very good move... what slightly concerns me more here is:  who are 'them' that told you they'd reviewed a week of CCTV and come up with several shoplifting instances over that time amounting to the above? have you directly contacted or had contact from Sainsbury's? and know they HAVE done this? or is this DWF willy waving and they tricked you into  admitting several previous successful thefts... this is not the norm...  dx      
    • next step then await the N157 from her local court giving the time and date of a future hearing some month in the future. now she MUST file a witness statement 14 days (typically) to both the court and kearns .  so cant allow to much of a time lag before you are aware of that and get her WS done. wack us up 2 multipage pdf files please  one of what they returned for the CRP reply . and one for everything they sent back in 2022 you've found.  we do not need statements. ideally it would be nice to see their WS before hers is finally filed. dx  
    • Another interesting article in the Grauniad - Counterfeit barcode stamps furore carries echoes of Horizon scandal | Consumer affairs | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Royal Mail admits its scanners ‘make mistakes’ but stands by the process it uses to detect fakes as ‘robust’  
    • DWF can't do anything as they act for a client. In this case, Sainsbury's. Sainsbury's could take you to court and ATTEMPT to get a CCJ but it's unlikely. They had no interest in dealing with you at the time. All DWF can do is send out pointless threatograms. They'll threaten to divert an Iranian drone to your house if you don't pay. However, they can't attempt to get a CCJ against you. IGNORE THEM. It's more important now to understand why you were allegedly shoplifting, and you should speak with your GP and try and get yourself signposted to the support that's available.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

overtime not offered to all


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4063 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As a manager within the care sector where overtime comes up all the time, I usually ask the person who pops into my head first, this is usually because I know they will do it and have in the past. Sometimes this type of thing comes up at a busy time and I have no time to speak with everyone and just do it to get it out the way.

 

Unfortunately unless stated in contract or there is a protected characteristic (bearing in mind ALL who wasnt asked have to have one or more of these and the chosen person has NONE) the manager can give extra hours to anyone they want.

 

As previously stated my suggestion would be to speak to manager and say that if any OT comes up in future they would like to be considered. This only means considered they would not be guaranteed it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree with this to an extent - the best approach is to the speak to the manager and say you'd like to be considered for overtime going forward.

 

It isn't the case though that overtime can be allocated any way the employer wants. If its done unfairly the employer is leaving themselves open to legal action. And a claim of Discrimination can be made if a person with a protected characteristic isn't considered for overtime, doesn't matter if other people who don't have protected characteristics aren't considered.

 

Unfortunately the manager can give OT to who ever he wants, as long as staff get their contracted hours.

 

Also for discrimination all the staff not receiving overtime must have a protected characteristic and the person getting it none. If this wasnt the case anyone with a protected characteristic could shout discrimination everytime they dnt get their own way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Caring Guy, You have been very patient bearing with us throughout this exchange of views and opinions. Especially when most of what you initially enquired about seems to have been overlooked or forgotten.

 

That initial enquiry was:

 

 

You have since explained why you feel aggrieved about this:

 

(a) The extra work was offered to one person without any opportunity given to anyone else who might have been interested or equally, or even more, entitled to be offered it.

 

(b) No reasonable explanation has been given to justify the manager’s decision despite informal conversations and questions among those concerned.

 

The first question then is; do you have a grievance? I say you do.

 

(i) Because you believe you have and you say you have.

 

(ii) You raise and discuss the issue with colleagues who are equally put out.

 

(iii) You have taken the time and trouble to seek advice about the course of action you should take on this forum.

 

I have yet to hear what this is if not a grievance.

 

The next question is; how to resolve your grievance?

 

(i) Do nothing; put it down to bad luck and get over it. This is not an option unless you are prepared to accept being treated like a doormat.

 

(ii) Try to have the matter resolved informally. You are being advised to take this course.But you have already tried this option; you have said repeatedly that you have tried over a period in conversations and informal enquiries to have your concerns and questions answered, to no avail. I see no point in continuing to advise this course. A reasonable manager would have set your mind at rest at this stage.

 

(iii) Put your grievance on a formal footing by invoking the grievance procedure.Employment law gives you the right to pursue your grievance through a formal grievance procedure. This could hardly be described as the action of a nonconformist or a revolutionary.

 

At the end of the day all you want at this stage is an answer to your grievance. It may be that you will get an answer that is quite reasonable and will persuade you that your grievance is unfounded. It may be that the answer you get will lead you to believe that you have grounds for taking the matter further. Either way you need to take the first step before you begin seriously considering the second.

 

It seems to me that you have already come to the conclusions and are more or less following the process I have outlined above.

 

The law lists some forms of discrimination as being more serious than others. This is not to say that suffering unfavourable treatment is not discrimination.

 

I suspect Atlas01 has lost the plot. He begins by advising caution and suggesting that making an official complaint might be going too far and has since progressed to advising CG to get his colleagues organised, sort of unionised, act as shop steward with authority to go to management with ultimatums.

 

Of all the advice proffered I find that of the ‘manager within the care sector’ not only sad but worrying and anyone with such an attitude should not be in a position of authority. It shows two traits that are unacceptable in a manager entrusted with responsibility. Firstly, too incompetent or too lazy to set up a fair rota system for overtime, especially since, on his own admission, the need for it comes up all the time. Secondly, what sort of a shambolic setup is he creating and running when his main concern when making decisions is to do the first thing that comes into his head in order to get it out of the way. I hope and pray that I or mine are never in the situation where he or anyone with similar ideas on how to manage has any influence.

 

Anyway Caring Guy, it seems from your last post that you are getting close to a resolution, here’s hoping.

 

Skinnered thanks for ur opinion, which is exactly what it is.

 

But have u ever worked in care, management, care management. Probably no.

 

For ur information when I am dishing shifts out, I feel I have no choice but to prioritise my work. In a sample month I have rotas and wages to do for 8 services - 27+ staff, 8 team meetings, 27+ supervisions, 8 audits (16 pages long), reviews (at least 8 per month), conduct issues, training (self and staff), adult protection issues, finances, staff shadowing, managers meetings, social work meetings, spending time with service users, plus having to answer my phone all day from many people. My phone book has 123 people in it whom I have contact with at least oncer every 6 weeks.

I also cover a distance of 57 miles (shortest route) from my base return visiting my services.

 

I have tried every system known to man but none work as great as you may think.

 

And for ur information I find you lazy and incompetent to give out factual information

 

Again I thank you for your OPINION.

 

Have a nice night.

 

J

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...