Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Akward GP


sherbert12
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4074 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I wonder if anyone can offer any advice please?

My daughter was referred due to a skin condition to a consultant dermatologist.

Before she was referred our gp prescribed a steroid mousse, which has worked wonders.

We then saw the specialist who advised that we carry on with the mousse until our next appointment.

After a few months we ran out and asked our gp to prescribe more. he has refused.

He said that he doesnt think it is the right treatment for her condition and suggested we go back into the surgery to discuss other treatments.

The specialist has faxed over her recommendations to him to carry on with the treatment, yet he refused yet again to prescribe and he refuses to refer the case to any other gp in the practice.

I am confused as to why he is not taking the advice of the expert in his field and remains stubborn, in the meantime my daughter is suffering from an outbreak due to lack of medication.

we ave asked the specialst to prescribe us directly, awaiting an answer this is all very akward and the practice manager of the surgery refuses to help us.

advice very welcome thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Long term use of steroids for skin conditions can lead to some severe adverse reactions maybe the GP has reservations on this score.

I suggest you contact the consultant directly asking for a further appointment.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying, she as another appointment in march. What I find unprofessional is that a specialist in their field has suggested the treatment continue and the gp is trying to cut her out of the picture and suggest treatment we have already tried and treatment that has already failed hence wasting everybodys time.

Is the gp allowed to override the decision of a specialist?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically yes the GP can decide not to continue a treatment he/she thinks is unsuitable, they are both experienced clinicians.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she is still under the specialist (which she is) what are we supposed to do? are we to make an appointment with the gp overriding the decision of the specialist, then go back to the specilist in a couple of weeks only to be switched back to the original treatment? then when we run out get refused again and start something else and so on seems odd to me. this is ping pong doctoring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are unhappy/concerned about you GPs stance on this you will need to make a complaint to your Primary Care Trust or demand that the GP allows a 2nd opinion from a Dr within the practice.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My daughter has eczema and has to use a number of creams, but non contain steriods. It took a while but we did finally find one which worked with the help of our GP.

 

As previously advised, the long term use of steriods can have side effects and can think the skin. However, one does wonder why a GP would refuse the advise of a specialist. What is the point of seeing a specialist if the GP just ignores the advice? Isn't that a waste of time and money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats what i think that the gp has wasted everyones time involved, steriods are the only thing that seems to have any impact on her condition.

the gp suggested i go back to another treatment which we have tried in the past and it has failed)

The way I see it, is that it is highly unprofessional to handle the matter in this way, by disregarding the specialists advice my daughter has suffered and it leaves the patient helpless in the middle of it all, and that is not right nor fair and a waste of nhs money and time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...