Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marshall Hoare


BB2012
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4119 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

I've been on here before about there guys. I've had a phonecall from 01224 931013 today, left no message but on google I could that its from a nasty fellow of Toothfairy finance.

I'm still getting texts and emails every 5 days or so, amount has gone from 200 to nearly 1200 now lol!! Make me laught when they add a "late payment fee" every few days even though there is no repayment plan in place.

Anyway, I emailed them over 8 weeks ago issuing I was making a formal complaint, I never got a reply. And since that email addressno longer goes through. So I have no way of contacting them as there is no way I will talk to them on the phone an every address seems to be fake or to a random place.

 

What should I do now? I want to make a formal complaint to OFT, how do I go about this formally? I have been in contact with them when this 1st started but they didn't really help much. Will they do something now I have issued Marshall Hoare with a formal complaint and they have not responded? I have kept all emails they have sent me.Any help and advice would be appreciated. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If 8 weeks have elapsed, get the FOS involved. Speedcredit, MH, toothfairy wont care one bit, as they know they are about to be shut down, so are doing everything they can to make money before it happens.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The more complaints the OFT gets, the better the chance they have of closing them down.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say go to the Financial Ombudsman Service since Marshall Hoares and NDR both have consumer credit licenses. By all means complain to the oft. Under FOS complaint rules all companies with consumer credit licenses must deal with complaints within a particular timeframe and should also acknowledge complaints received within a certain timescale. If they have not done this they could be in breach of the FOS guidelines for complaint handling. They have 8 weeks to respond to a FOS complaint by either resolving your complaint to your satisfaction or sending a final response letter. If you are still not happy with their response at this point you can go to the fos and they will then investigate. They will charge the company £500 for every full complaint regardless of whether it is upheld or not. Go the fos website and check out how to complain. Also look at OFT guidelines for debt collection companies which tell you what collection companies should and shouldnt be doing. Marshall Hoares have two licensed bailiffs but they are private rather than county court bailiffs and are not licensed to collect the debts that marshall hoares collect. In order to send a bailiff they first have to send a county court claim form - the judgment form which has to default for them to apply to send a bailiff.

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...