Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • old and new threads merged i though you were going to send the SB letter in 2017? dx  
    • dunno you've not scanned up what you've had before how can we tell?  
    • Today , after a lot of years i received a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we haven't had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. up to 2000 I had successfully gotten deferment on low income. But rather than sign on as unemployed ,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondence ceased from them, circa 2001. To date I have had no correspondence from Student Loans. I was made redundant in 2009 and reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now , today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Atos


MrNobody
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Went for a medical assessment this morning accompanying someone and the centre was closed.

 

Went across the road to JCP who told us it was closed until Tuesday and they don't know why and that we should have been informed - we weren't.

 

We should get another appointment, but we don't know when.

 

Had to cancel another appointment because ATOS wouldn't let this one be cancelled and I wanted to attend with the person.

 

Have I missed anything in the news? Have ATOS finally been overturned? Yeah, right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Mr Nobody:

 

Read what happened to me earlier this year. #11 at;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?375733-Atos-Assessment-in-need-of-an-Audio-Recorder/

 

Through local knowledge we've since found out that it was nothing to do with LIMA or audio recorded messicals but we can't find out for sure why the assessment centre did some messicals that day but not others.

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately we'd probably be sanctioned fortrying to sanction them. Maybe they were assessed and deemed not fit for work yesterday?

 

Starryeyes - wow, you went through it! I hope everything is sorted now????? Atos do have a big reputation....and not in a good way!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lost my first WCA scoring zero points, but won support group status at tribunal. Am also surprised, but incredibly thankful, that I've been left in support group after my renewal. This time, they are leaving me alone for longer too.

 

My experience has been a lot easier than I'd worked myself up into thinking it was going to be. Yes, initially it was a stressful time, but thankfully, for now at least, they are being nice and leaving me alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really does all depend on who you see. I saw a really nice Lady who was really helpful, BUT i also took my support worker with me so maybe thats why it went well.

 

My flatmate on the other hand, went into the medical alone and saw a guy in a wheelchair who is notorious for failing anyone who is more able bodied than him. He seems to have the view that if he can work everyone else can. What a suprise then that the whole report was full of lies.

 

Really wondered if they had genuinly mixed him up with someone else as a couple of times on the DM report, someone elses name was used.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No letter regarding a new date yet (probably tomorrow now I have posted). I wouldn't put it past them to fail her as she 'did not attend' and try that trick.

 

Thanks for the replies everybody.

 

Good luck Margaret in getting it fully sorted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello

 

Well, she went on 8th March and has received a letter today.

 

She was on Income Support but is moving over to ESA - Work Related Group. It says this starts on 30th April and her money is kept the same as it is now.

 

Does this imply that she has 'passed' her medical assessment? There is no clear indication. The closest to it is ""This will replace your incapacity benefit, income support on the grounds of illness, disability or Severe Disablement Allowance.

 

It has various bits saying "You may need to have work focused, health related assessment" Does this mean she may have to have another medical soon?

 

In the past, the letters I have seen told you that you passed or not, this isn't clear.

 

She's as confused as me.

 

Thanks for any help.

 

PS - It doesn't state how many points she received anywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Well, she went on 8th March and has received a letter today.

 

She was on Income Support but is moving over to ESA - Work Related Group. It says this starts on 30th April and her money is kept the same as it is now.

 

Does this imply that she has 'passed' her medical assessment? There is no clear indication. The closest to it is ""This will replace your incapacity benefit, income support on the grounds of illness, disability or Severe Disablement Allowance.

 

It has various bits saying "You may need to have work focused, health related assessment" Does this mean she may have to have another medical soon?

 

In the past, the letters I have seen told you that you passed or not, this isn't clear.

 

She's as confused as me.

 

Thanks for any help.

 

PS - It doesn't state how many points she received anywhere.

 

File it under confused..

Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I read the letter and google what it means, I think she has been awarded Income Based ESA in the WRAG as it doesn't start until 30th April and will receive Income Support until then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I would think she has passed and is in the WRAG group, and will likely hear about WFI on or from the April date. Just make sure she/you know her rights etc so she doesn't get taken advantage of. Am sure it will be fine but always pays to have a heads up on what to expect and what to do if the unexpected should happen lol......but that's just me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ruby...She already attends Work Focused Interviews every 3/4 weeks with a very supportive adviser, albeit with support as she is keen to try and do something. She was told by her adviser that this wouldn't change if she was placed on ESA. I hope this is true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well that's all good then .... well done and I wish her all the best with this. I would think the gumph about assessing just means that they do these periodically as we all know, I think its possible that you can ring and find out how long before they will assess again. Am sure I have read on here somewhere that people have found out how long they have been put into a group for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we may just leave it and let her rest after all of the stress she's been under and deal with the re-assessment when it comes up. Who knows, she may be doing something by then.

 

I also just noticed their is an ATOS Sub Forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...