Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MP's to tackle the bailiff industry in a House of Commons debate today !!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If anyone is able to do so, it would be worth watching a "catch up " version of a speech this afternoon from the Parliament Channel as Coventry JMP Mr Jim Cunningham MP secured a Commons debate about the bailiff industry. The following is a "word" version of an article that appeared in yesterday's edition of the Coventry Telegraph that provides background.....

 

 

 

A COVENTRY MP has secured a Commons debate tomorrow about the treatment of vulnerable people by council-hired bailiffs following a Telegraph investigation.

 

The ten-minute rule bill scheduled for 2.30pm on Tuesday has been brought by Coventry South Labour MP Jim Cunningham, who wants the government to provide more protection for vulnerable people from inappropriate bailiff visits.

 

Last October the Telegraph uncovered practices in Coventry including a failure by council-hired bailiffs to report vulnerable cases back to the council in line with government guidelines.

 

We also highlighted excessive and multiple charges by bailiffs which heaped unexplained charges onto the unpaid debts of the sick and disabled for council tax or parking fines.

 

 

Thirty MPs have also signed Mr Cunningham’s early day motion calling on the government and councils to ensure bailiffs adhere to the national guidelines, and regulations over charging limits.

 

Tomorrow’s debate, which will raise the Telegraph’s findings, comes after the House of Lords last month voted against the government in calling for better regulation of the bailiff industry.

 

The crossbench peer, Baroness Meacher, had tabled an amendment to the crime and courts bill which would allow people who feel mistreated by bailiffs to appeal to an ombudsman.

 

Our investigation highlighted how a mother from Eastern Green on NHS suicide watch had charges heaped on to her bill, and faced repeated threats of her possessions being seized – even though we saw evidence she was paying back her parking fine debts through agreed payments.

 

A disabled woman from Walsgrave with a stress-related condition had also agreed a payment plan by instalments, yet she received 10 threatening letters in two days demanding she paid thousands of pounds in full.

 

Coventry Citizens’ Advice Bureau also claimed government vulnerable persons’ guidelines were being breached, including in the way the council’s hired bailiff, Newlyn Plc, handled the case of a cancer sufferer.

Mr Cunningham will tomorrow raise local and national concerns, including those contained in a damning local government ombudsman’s report published last month.

 

He is backing its recommendations, which include ensuring councils only charge fees in line with national regulations; provide clear details of their charges; make proper checks when levying vehicles; and exercise caution with potentially vulnerable debtors.

 

Mr Cunningham said the debate would raise the profile of the issue just weeks before the Ministry of Justice is finally expected to report back on a delayed review of the bailiffs industry.

 

He added: “I want to not only put pressure on the government to implement the recommendations of the Local Government Ombudsman’s report and others, but to give a date when they will be implemented.”

 

The council has been reviewing its bailiffs’ arrangements with Coventry CAB since the Telegraph’s investigation

Link to post
Share on other sites

The speech was scheduled to start at 2.30 but was 30 minutes earlier.

 

Mr Cunningham "commended the Bill" to the House. There were no objections. A second reading has been scheduled for Friday 25th January 2012.

 

Interesting times ahead.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The crossbench peer, Baroness Meacher, had tabled an amendment to the crime and courts bill which would allow people who feel mistreated by bailiffs to appeal to an Ombudsman." NOT a good idea in my opinion.

Agreed lamma, definitely not, as an Ombudsman can "Report" and "Recommend" but has no actual legal sanction to apply.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is needed is body that can regulate the two most out of control industries in the UK - the civil enforcement industry and the private security industry. Although the Security Industry Authority (SIA) was set up to police the private security industry, it is a regulator that has been pretty much neutered by the politicians and is totally ineffective. As we all know, the police are totally clueless about bailiff law and so is ACPO.

 

What is needed is a regulator who can police the civil enforcement and private security indsutries without right-wing politicians doing their usual brand of hand-wringing, "Oh dear, we can't shackle private business," and allowing a situation to develop where the safety of the public is put at significant risk and those employed within the two industries are permitted to behave in a criminal manner with impunity.

 

My proposal is for an agency, a Community Interest Company (CIC) (a not-for-profit entity which is similar to a charitable company), called the Civil Enforcement & Security Regulation Agency (CESRA) to be set up to not only licence bailiff and security businesses, but to have the ability to employ mobile enforcement teams, equipped with statutory powers, similar to the police, but with the additional power to overrule police officers, where necessary, and to arrest those employed within the civil enforcement and private security industries who feel the law doesn't apply to them. Such teams would attend incidents involving certificated bailiffs, HCEOs and private security personnel. A statutory provision to require police officers to summon CESRA enforcement teams to an incident is a must. This is only a proposal, but it is something the politicians need to consider and take seriously, otherwise people are going to be seriously injured or, even, killed, by the Rent-A-Thug elements that inhabit the civil enforcement and private security industries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Ob on this one there has to be accountability, and a proper complaints track with real teeth to bite the rogue elements imho

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt the Government would come back with their own organisation - Association of Recovery & Security Enforcement

 

Most likely, toothless or with rubber teeth like a Re-Pet from the 6th Day

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully they will do something at last

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once part 3 of the TCE Act is in the charging structure will be transparent. Unfortunately, that doesn't protect the vulnerable from facing these charges and it is this that needs clearer clarification and regulation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once part 3 of the TCE Act is in the charging structure will be transparent. Unfortunately, that doesn't protect the vulnerable from facing these charges and it is this that needs clearer clarification and regulation.

That is the nub of the issue, as many facing this will already be unable to afford the original debt and are unlikely to ever repay the debt plus the extra bailiff charges in their lifetime.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt the Government would come back with their own organisation - Association of Recovery & Security Enforcement

 

A commercial entity which looks after the interests of its members and not the public. We've seen this with the financial sector when the Tories deregulated it. The regulatory bodies they set up were as effective as chocolate fireguards.

 

The CESRA proposal I have put forward would be a regulator with teeth that bite and a bite that hurts. It's long-overdue. Making such a regulator a CIC means it has to operate for the benefit of the community. A number of former NHS PCTs have reformed as CICs to ensure commercial enterprises cannot muscle in and turn primary healthcare into a postcode lottery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt the Government would come back with their own organisation - Association of Recovery & Security Enforcement

 

A commercial entity which looks after the interests of its members and not the public. We've seen this with the financial sector when the Tories deregulated it. The regulatory bodies they set up were as effective as chocolate fireguards.

 

The CESRA proposal I have put forward would be a regulator with teeth that bite and a bite that hurts. It's long-overdue. Making such a regulator a CIC means it has to operate for the benefit of the community. A number of former NHS PCTs have reformed as CICs to ensure commercial enterprises cannot muscle in and turn primary healthcare into a postcode lottery.

 

Sorry I did this tongue in cheek & should have highlighted it earlier.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ ploddertom and oldbill :lol::lol:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...