Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

John Lewis: Discrimination/cheated by


kp39
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

With great pain I am writing to you as I am cheated(I assume) by John Lewis phone order service. On 09/12/12, I called Welwyn JL store(01707 323456) to order camera(D5100 with 18-55mm and 55-200mm lens) as I show on hotukdeals for £429.95. I was told by customer service lady that deal is over but there is deal in Southampton store and she can order for me at £449.95 and we both agreed on it. She order for me with my card details and she gave me order no: 35609537. After that I had talk with my friends and 3 of my friends ordered it with price £449.95 and one of my friend also got tracking number.

After talk with my friend who got tracking number I called Welwyn JL store(01707 323456) one more time for tracking number and person told me that my order has been cancelled as there was issue with bank and asked me to contact bank. I immediately called bank and they said payment is gone fine and also gave me payment reference number. After that I called Welwyn JL store(01707 323456) and they said it was wrong deal so they cancel deal.

Here Welwyn JL store(01707 323456) and I both agreed on price of £449.95 even-though they charged me £ 639.95 without my permission and without my knowledge. They lied to me about order cancellation and also cancel my order without any reason.

Here JL cheated me with more price then what was agreed and also cancel my order and giving me wrong reason though they accepted and delivered camera who order after me for £449.95, I want to know why this has happened to me and who will pay me for my loss as I also lost same deal form currys as I was loyal JL customer and want to buy from it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flexi pricing !! . Happening a lot, these days. And even worse is cookies on your PC, so some stores offer low prices, to attract you, then they change the next time you visit........... Viking Direct, are good at this.

 

Problem with Hotdeals website, is it's very popular, and deals run out quickly. Some stores will limit numbers on an offer, especially if its added to Hotdeals, and other such sites.

 

On the face of it. You agreed to pay the higher price over the phone. And your subsequent, sculldugery to find it again, is completely separate, and after the fact .......................... You hav'nt so much been had, as been drawn in and accepted a price, you were'nt happy with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for reply, we had agreed on price of £449.95 and they charged me £639.95 and also cancel my order, I suprise that people who order after me got their camera and I am still waiting for my refund as they are sitting on it not sure how to resolve it as I deserve camera else why did they honored order after my one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have to make a formal complaint to the manager of the store that took the order.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like 'bait and switch' which is against OFT guidelines

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...