Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if you mean post stuff here for us to read you redact it and use PDF  read UPLOAD dx  
    • tell her to simply ignore all the harassment and laugh at them.  
    • you dont need to hide times dates and £figures can you please type the POC out in full not your abridged version above. dx  
    • you mean you've done AOS? not filed a defence yet? dx  
    • Rather than dsunaks lies, lets look at the reaL Data and real black holes in the UKs budget - all created by the poop Tories   Public sector finances, UK: April 2024   Main points Borrowing – the difference between public sector spending and income – was (a black hole of) £20.5 billion in JUST April 2024, the fourth highest April borrowing since monthly records began in 1993. Borrowing in April 2024 was £1.5 billion more than in April 2023 and £1.2 billion more than the £19.3 billion forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Public sector receipts grew by £1.6 billion compared with April 2023, however, this growth was outstripped by a £3.1 billion increase in spending over the same period. Since our March 2024 publication, we have increased our initial estimate of borrowing in the financial year ending March 2024 by £0.8 billion to £121.4 billion, now £7.3 billion more than the £114.1 billion forecast by the OBR. Public sector net debt excluding public sector banks (debt) at the end of April 2024 was provisionally estimated at 97.9% of gross domestic product (GDP); this was 2.5 percentage points more than at the end of April 2023, and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s. Excluding the Bank of England, debt was 89.9% of GDP, 8.0 percentage points lower than the wider debt measure. Public sector net worth excluding public sector banks was in deficit by £703.4 billion at the end of April 2024, a £93.5 billion larger deficit than at the end of April 2023.     and the Tory legacy of financial mismanagement  to be passed on :   UK government debt 2023 | Statista WWW.STATISTA.COM Government debt in the United Kingdom reached over 2.25 trillion British pounds in 2022/23, compared with 1.83 trillion pounds in... - and graph does NOT show the increases as it should  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds TSB Credit Card, The Story So Far!!


jamesac
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

i am new to the forum but have been viewing posts for several years now.

 

Basically back in 2007, We tried (i say we as my wife had a lloyds tsb credit card which i tried to help get charges back) to obtain the unfair charges on the account which consisted of PPI, Administration Charges, Late Charges, Unpaid Chq.DD Charges, Merchandise Interest and Late payment charges. Including interest these total up to around £2700, then there is the 8% to go on, most of these charges are from 2001-2006 so the interest has built up.

 

The credit card account is currently not used, closed off but has a negative balance of £2014.00

 

We have written to the bank to try and resolve this and threatened court action etc, only to be told we could not carry on any further as the famous "test case" that the OFT put in place was going ahead, We did not realise this did not include credit card accounts. However never heard anything from Lloyds TSB about the debt and presumed it had been cancelled after a few strong letters sent to them.

 

4 years later, we have recently recieved a letter from a company called Lowells, attempting to collect this debt of which we contacted lloyds TSB, They claimed the debt was still owed so we informed them that the last response from them was that the account was in dispute and no further action would be taken. We did not hear from Lloyds TSB again.

 

As soon as the lowells letter came, i requested the original contract from them etc and advised them of the dispute via letter and issued the court summons for £3200 plus costs

 

I received a without predjudice letter from SCM solicitors (i presume these are Lloyds inhouse legal dept) offering an out of court settlement of £210 plus my £100 court fee back!!!!.

 

After i stopped laughing, i started to draft my response

 

I wrote back to them to tell them court proceedings will still go ahead of which they have filed a defence (looks pretty standard to me) spouting terms and conditions and claiming the claim is denied etc

 

I have filed the AQ today and requested mediation Am i correct in doing this?

 

I have taken a few people and companies to court through money claim / small claims and all but one have paid in full through mediation but from what i have read on here, The bank will not show up to defend anyway and so i may as well just have this transferred to my local county court.

 

If you can offer any advice on anything i have listed above, i would be very grateful. I will start to prepare my court bundle which shows that we have tried to resolve this years ago as lloyds are now saying that claims older than six years are barred by the limitation act 1980.

 

I also have all my statements from Lloyds and have a spreadsheet which calculates the interest since the day it was charged etc. I have provided Lloyds TSB with all of this information and their response was, please wait for the outcome of the test case.

 

This has gone on for far too long now so i want to take these down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

hope anyone can give some good advice regarding this as i don't want to lose this over some minor technicality!

 

Thanks

James & Lucy :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, you shouold understand that the bank will defend this in court.

 

The days of automatic cave-ins are pretty well gone.

 

You don't give us any information about what it is you are claiming other than a bit of a jumble:-

 

Basically back in 2007, We tried (i say we as my wife had a Lloydslink3.gif tsb credit card which i tried to help get charges back) to obtain the unfair charges on the account which consisted of PPI, Administration Charges, Late Charges, Unpaid Chq.DD Charges, Merchandise interestlink3.gif and Late payment charges. Including interest these total up to around £2700, then there is the 8% to go on, most of these charges are from 2001-2006 so the interest has built up.

 

Also, you don't say what they say the £210 is intended to represent.

 

I think that we need more details as to what i8t is you are claiming, what are the circumstances of the PPI and at what rate were the credit card charges levied and what is their total value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

thanks for the quick response,

 

i havent mentioned £210? if this is a typo then the following is a copy of the spreadsheet attachement

 

 

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £8.07 09/02/2002 3887 £6.90

INTEREST £15.46 09/02/2002 3887 £13.22

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.09 10/03/2002 3858 £6.02

INTEREST £12.32 10/03/2002 3858 £10.46

LATE CHARGES £18.00 10/03/2002 3858 £15.28

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.10 08/04/2002 3829 £5.98

INTEREST £12.49 08/04/2002 3829 £10.52

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.61 10/05/2002 3797 £6.36

INTEREST £14.01 10/05/2002 3797 £11.70

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.99 10/06/2002 3766 £6.62

INTEREST £10.17 10/06/2002 3766 £8.43

LATE CHARGES £18.00 10/06/2002 3766 £14.91

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.79 09/07/2002 3737 £6.40

INTEREST £13.96 09/07/2002 3737 £11.48

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.80 09/08/2002 3706 £6.36

INTEREST £14.22 09/08/2002 3706 £11.59

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.97 08/09/2002 3676 £6.45

INTEREST £13.94 08/09/2002 3676 £11.27

LATE CHARGES £18.00 08/09/2002 3676 £14.56

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.12 13/09/2002 3671 £5.75

INTEREST £13.81 13/09/2002 3671 £11.15

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.16 10/10/2002 3644 £5.74

INTEREST £13.54 10/10/2002 3644 £10.85

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.16 14/11/2002 3609 £5.68

INTEREST £12.61 14/11/2002 3609 £10.01

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.31 13/12/2002 3580 £5.76

INTEREST £12.38 13/12/2002 3580 £9.75

LATE CHARGES £20.00 13/12/2002 3580 £15.75

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £6.86 15/01/2003 3547 £5.35

INTEREST £14.35 15/01/2003 3547 £11.20

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.01 14/02/2003 3517 £5.42

INTEREST £12.27 14/02/2003 3517 £9.49

LATE CHARGES £20.00 14/02/2003 3517 £15.47

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.31 14/03/2003 3489 £5.61

INTEREST £11.95 14/03/2003 3489 £9.17

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.47 14/04/2003 3458 £5.68

INTEREST £13.51 14/04/2003 3458 £10.28

ADMINISTRATION CHARGE £15.00 30/04/2003 3442 £11.36

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £6.82 16/05/2003 3426 £5.14

INTEREST £13.59 16/05/2003 3426 £10.24

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £6.96 13/06/2003 3398 £5.20

INTEREST £11.51 13/06/2003 3398 £8.60

LATE CHARGES £20.00 13/06/2003 3398 £14.95

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.00 15/07/2003 3366 £5.18

INTEREST £13.28 15/07/2003 3366 £9.83

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.01 14/08/2003 3336 £5.14

INTEREST £12.49 14/08/2003 3336 £9.17

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.02 12/09/2003 3307 £5.11

INTEREST £12.08 12/09/2003 3307 £8.79

INTEREST ADJUSTMENT £20.04 15/09/2003 3304 £14.57

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.06 15/10/2003 3274 £5.09

INTEREST £14.16 15/10/2003 3274 £10.20

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.08 14/11/2003 3244 £5.05

INTEREST £12.59 14/11/2003 3244 £8.99

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.08 12/12/2003 3216 £5.01

INTEREST £11.78 12/12/2003 3216 £8.33

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.11 15/01/2004 3182 £4.98

INTEREST £14.27 15/01/2004 3182 £9.99

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.12 13/02/2004 3153 £4.94

INTEREST £12.25 13/02/2004 3153 £8.50

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.28 15/03/2004 3122 £5.00

INTEREST £13.15 15/03/2004 3122 £9.03

LATE CHARGES £20.00 15/03/2004 3122 £13.74

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.31 16/04/2004 3090 £4.97

INTEREST £14.10 16/04/2004 3090 £9.59

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.31 14/05/2004 3062 £4.92

INTEREST £12.17 14/05/2004 3062 £8.20

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £7.33 15/06/2004 3030 £4.89

INTEREST £13.88 15/06/2004 3030 £9.25

CASH ADVANCE HANDLING CHARGE £14.00 07/07/2004 3008 £9.26

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £12.86 15/07/2004 3000 £8.49

INTEREST £15.94 15/07/2004 3000 £10.52

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £12.88 13/08/2004 2971 £8.42

INTEREST £22.15 13/08/2004 2971 £14.48

CARD HOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £12.91 15/09/2004 2938 £8.34

INTEREST £25.18 15/09/2004 2938 £16.28

INTEREST £23.02 15/10/2004 2908 £14.73

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £12.94 15/10/2004 2908 £8.28

INTEREST £25.67 15/11/2004 2877 £16.25

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £12.98 15/11/2004 2877 £8.22

INTEREST £24.95 15/12/2004 2847 £15.63

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £13.02 15/12/2004 2847 £8.15

INTEREST £27.48 17/01/2005 2814 £17.01

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £13.04 17/01/2005 2814 £8.07

INTEREST £23.40 14/02/2005 2786 £14.34

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £13.01 14/02/2005 2786 £7.97

UNPAID CHQ/DD CHARGE £20.00 15/02/2005 2785 £12.25

INTEREST £23.23 14/03/2005 2758 £14.10

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £12.79 14/03/2005 2758 £7.76

UNPAID CHQ/DD CHARGE £20.00 11/04/2005 2730 £12.01

INTEREST £26.32 15/04/2005 2726 £15.78

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £13.25 15/04/2005 2726 £7.95

MERCHANDISE INTEREST £25.92 16/05/2005 2695 £15.37

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £12.97 16/05/2005 2695 £7.69

MERCHANDISE INTEREST £24.90 15/06/2005 2665 £14.60

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £12.96 15/06/2005 2665 £7.60

INTEREST £24.09 14/07/2005 2636 £13.97

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £13.29 14/07/2005 2636 £7.71

INTEREST £24.07 12/08/2005 2607 £13.81

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £13.29 12/08/2005 2607 £7.62

UNPAID CHQ/DD CHARGE £20.00 08/09/2005 2580 £11.35

INTEREST £27.49 14/09/2005 2574 £15.57

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £13.77 14/09/2005 2574 £7.80

INTEREST £25.89 14/10/2005 2544 £14.49

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £14.08 14/10/2005 2544 £7.88

INTEREST £28.25 15/11/2005 2512 £15.61

LATE CHARGES £20.00 15/11/2005 2512 £11.05

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £14.57 15/11/2005 2512 £8.05

UNPAID CHQ/DD CHARGE £20.00 15/11/2005 2512 £11.05

UNPAID CHQ/DD CHARGE £20.00 13/12/2005 2484 £10.93

INTEREST £26.77 14/12/2005 2483 £14.62

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £15.14 14/12/2005 2483 £8.27

ADMINISTRATION CHARGE £15.00 12/01/2006 2454 £8.10

INTEREST £25.62 13/01/2006 2453 £13.83

INTEREST £27.33 26/06/2006 2289 £13.76

INTEREST £28.18 25/08/2006 2229 £13.82

LATE CHARGES £12.00 25/08/2006 2229 £5.88

INTEREST £30.10 26/09/2006 2197 £14.55

LATE CHARGES £12.00 26/09/2006 2197 £5.80

INTEREST £27.34 25/10/2006 2168 £13.04

LATE CHARGES £12.00 25/10/2006 2168 £5.72

INTEREST £28.43 24/11/2006 2138 £13.37

INTEREST £26.20 22/12/2006 2110 £12.16

LATE CHARGES £12.00 22/12/2006 2110 £5.57

INTEREST £32.45 25/01/2007 2076 £14.82

LATE CHARGES £12.00 26/01/2007 2075 £5.48

INTEREST £28.14 23/02/2007 2047 £12.67

LATE CHARGES £12.00 01/03/2007 2041 £5.39

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but could you just explain it simply rather than presenting lists of figures.

 

Ta

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok,

 

the following is a summary of the spreadsheet which hopefully is a little clearer

 

INTEREST £1,292.80

UNPAID CHQ/DD CHARGE £118.59

PAYMENT PROTECTION COVER £241.68

MERCHENDISE INTEREST £60.96

LATE CHARGES £287.41

INTEREST ADJUSTMENT £26.79

CASH ADVANCE £17.80

ADMIN CHARGES £37.76

CARDHOLDER PROTECTION PLAN £348.69

 

We have asked LLoyds TSB to provide information relatiing to both the cardholder protection plan and payment protection cover, which i presume is PPI, but they have failed to supply the information to us showing what was agreed on taking out the credit card, if it was sold correctly and what it was for. They have also failed to supply the original credit agreement for the card account and state that having statements every month is enough proof to show that the account existed and by using the card, my wife adhered to the t&cs of the account

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that I don't have a lot of time for the next couple of days.

Very briefly, you haven't given deta8il of the basis of your claim but I feel that you may have jumped the gun a bit because you don't seem to betoo clear either as to what or why you are claiming.

 

CC charges are generally recopverable if they are over the OFT recommended cap of £12. Therefore, a CC charge of £18 would be all recoverable - not just the difference between the £12 and the £18.

 

PPI - you need to be able to show the basis of your claim - what misselling has there been..

 

You don't give enough detail to be able to advise here - but it seems to me that you mave made a claim on a very general ground and that you really don't have much of an argument to go on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...