Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
    • No need to worry about Rwanda Just give all the illegals one way trip to Northern Ireland then they can wander off into the EU through your beloved open border.     Job Done 😂🤣  
    • despite the evidence mounting against Chrichton, Vennells wrote in a meeting note that Crichton 'was possibly more loyal to her professional conduct requirements' "Vennells said Crichton was upset that the Post Office had ruined her reputation and compromised her by undertaking a further review of the Second Sight handling. Crichton was said to be ‘very emotional’ and her ‘ego and self-esteem have been undermined’."   That it seems all about their own interests - says a lot about both Chrichton and Vennels views on 'professional conduct requirements' eh?   Former Post Office chief executive Paula Vennells complained that general counsel put her integrity 'above interests of business' | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Susan Crichton was left waiting outside board meeting to discuss damaging forensic accountant's report, inquiry hears.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

New user with problem concerning Opus credit card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I am new user who is currently experiencing problems with Opus Credit Card (transferred from Citi Card) if you could push me in the right direction of where to post, I would be grateful.

 

Also a big hello to anyone and everyone, great resource you have here by the way.

 

Thanks

 

Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

 

I had a credit card with Citi and it was transferred to Opus whilst on a payment agreement with their collections department, when it transferred they removed the smaller payment and ramped up my interest to about 39% and a payment of approx £145.00 per months was reducing the total by about £20.00 per month.

 

I complained in writing about this but they didn't answer the complaint in writing just on the phone and said I was only on that agreement for 6 months (this was the 6 months when it transferred). I have asked to go back on the collections payment and offered £70.00 per month and filled in an expenditure form with them on the phone but refused to tell them how much I owe my other creditors, monthly payment details I gave but not balances.

 

They have threatened me that if I don't supply the balances they will not put a payment procedure in place and I am building up all kinds of late fees and interest, do I have to supply them that information?

 

I thought it was something a court had to ask for,but I'm probably wrong, anyway how would you suggest I proceed.

 

Many thanks

 

Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

You tell them what they are going to get, not the other way around.

 

All of those charges that have been put on for late payment, being over-limit etc can be reclaimed together with the interest. Use this spreadsheet to work out how much you claim is.

 

CISheet v101.xls

 

Have you got all of the statements for the account showing the charges and the dates applied?

 

If not, SAR the lender to get as much information as you can on the account.

 

Stop trying to deal with this on the phone.

 

Everything in writing so you have a paper trail of events.

 

Also, is there any PPI on the account? This could be reclaimed too if it was mis-sold

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

read a few thread s in this forum

 

dont trust a word opus say.

 

these cards have not been around for years

 

tell us the history please

 

is this on your cra file too?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

The history is

 

I was originally with citicards and was on an payment arrangement,

they then swapped me over to Opus and put my interest up really high.

 

I wrote and complained a few times and they denied I was on the payment plan with Citicard

then they agreed I had been but only for 6 months

this has dragged on over a year and from paying £142.00 per month I have been paying something like £30 off the balance during it each month.

 

I have complained and not had a full answer about the payment plan dates

as i queried that the 6 months was over the transfer time to Opus

which they deny although they cant tell me when the 6 months ran from and to?

 

I have asked to go back on a payment plan

but they demanded an expenditure form be completed which i have done over the phone

 

now they say they want the balances on my other debts as well

or they will not setup the payment plan.

 

I have offered them £70.00 per month on a balance of about £2900

 

They have warned me I am incurring more late payments fees etc

but I didn t think I had to tell them what my other creditors balances are,

they have said as a good credit card company they want to know....

 

.should I just tell them.

 

.and what do I do about the complaint they havent answered?

 

Regards

 

Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

never ever tell anyone your PERS financial details

 

they have no legal right to see it

 

only a judge can demand that.

 

can you get your CRA file please.

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I will sort out the CRA file after work today and let you know either tonight or tomorrow.

 

I seem to be a bit of a catch 22 situation as they wont allow me to setup my new payment plan without the creditor details and I'm a bit worried they will sell the debt on or people will come knocking, but its them blocking my attempts to pay them.

 

I certainly wont tell them anything now and I appreciate the advice.

 

Thanks

 

Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd hold on wanting make a payment

 

i have my suspcions about this debt.

 

might be an idea to read a few threads in this citi forum.

 

i think you'll soon get the idea

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so

opus are in a way pulling your string

 

theres nowt wrong with the debt.

 

they've not defaulted you

so they must have been happy.

 

pers i'd just pay what you propse by YOUR internet banking site.

 

as for them passing it to a dca

 

they've got no powers

 

niether have any doorsteppers

 

they AER NOT BAILIFFS.

 

ignore the phone

ignore the threat-o-grams

 

get on and pay them what you comfortably can.

 

no judge would ever make you do otherwise.

 

get that reclaiming going

 

have you ever CCA'd them?

 

if not it might be funny to do it...

 

very many old citicards no-one has any paperwork on anymore

 

esp if your card is older than 2005

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have 12+2 working days

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...