Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Overpayment


confused1977
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I live with my ex partner, and we have 2 children together. we are however not a couple. We live together because there is no other family who can help with child minding.

 

We split a couple of years ago and she moved into her parents house with the children, her parents have been having some money problems and have been struggling to make ends meet, and there is a risk that they may lose their house and she was worried that they would end up having nowhere to live.

 

I came into some money and used it for a deposit for a house and we agreed that we could co habit for the kids's sake and her job means she works really early mornings or late nights and I can work around these shifts, so when she is on mornings, I can get the kids up and ready for school and drop them off before I go to work. and when I start early on a morning she sorts out the kids and goes off to work when I come in.

 

When I was arranging the house I was advised that it would be better to try to pursue it together, as you dont have to be in a relationship to buy a house together. And if something happened to me down the line my kids would be looked after, so i put up the deposit and agreed to put the ex's name on the mortgage and in return she would not demand money or chase me up from the csa or anything like that.

 

Sounded like the ideal situation, i got to spend more time with the kids, they got somewhere to live.

 

However she didnt declare that I had moved in as we dont consider ourselves to be a couple, we live our own lives, i cook my own tea, buy my own shopping.

 

now she has received a letter saying that she has been overpaid tax credits as there is paperwork tying us together since we put in for the mortgage, i had bank statements sent there as thats where we met the financial advisor about the mortgage, and it was easier than me forgetting them.

 

I am now worried what is going to happen next.

 

she has 30 days to appeal the decision, she doesnt want to as when she called up about the letter she was told that appealing could involve going to court and having hearing and if she doesnt win the appeal she will owe more money that she already does.

 

Her part time wages barely cover the gas and electric and her other bills. will they allow her to pay it off over a long term?

 

And we have now been told to do a joint claim, if thats how it has to be, even though we arent a couple will they look at my earnings to put towards paying off this overpayment.

 

can anyone offer any help or advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with your scenario is that although you aren't an actual couple in a relationship, you are still financially linked.

 

You do have two choices you can appeal against the decision or you can decide to put in a couple claim and both incomes will need to be declared for the assessment, if there is any entitlement then the overpayment will be recovered directly from any entitlement that you have if no entitlement then you will be asked as a couple to put in place a repayment plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so if we put in a claim as a couple, i know they will look at our combined incomes when it comes down to what are entitled to receive from the tax credits.

 

she says we would be entitled to £30 per week or so for what we earn together. Would any repayments from the over payment come from that £30?

 

or would they expect us to pay back more than that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

she was told that by the person on the phone from tax credits, they also went on about my bank statements at her old address, and where was my car insured? as i was committing an offence if my car was not kept at the address it was declared at...... like car insurance is anything to do with them..

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car insurance is used used as part of the bigger picture where they look at if you were linked financially, although I do understand what you mean, did you have a fixed address during the time you were seperated and she claimed as a single parent?

If there is any entitlement then they will look to recover any overpayment from your award. They may reduce the award but it will also depend on the final figure of overpayment etc as to how they arrange the collection of overpayment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

she won't owe more by appealing - there are no court costs involved in appeals, so whoever told her that is very much mistaken.

 

unless the advisor was referring to applying a penalty

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/taxcredits/things-go-wrong/complaints-appeals/penalties.htm

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless the advisor was referring to applying a penalty

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/taxcredits/things-go-wrong/complaints-appeals/penalties.htm

 

Yes but whether you appeal or not should have no bearing on whether a penalty is applied - holding a penalty over someone's head who thinks that their overpayment decision is wrong is pretty reprehensible. I also think that if they tried to explain it as 'by appealing you've not been very helpful', they'd be in trouble as penalties themselves can be challenged, and to be seen to be interfering with appeal rights would not be viewed favourably.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...