Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

************** read this about swift money first **********


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4326 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please read this first about Swift Money before you apply for a loan with them. I am going to include a copy of my emails and their replies to them. They barred me from applying to any more loans for making a query or posting a comment about their policies. You will see from their replies that they act like a dictator in the way they run their business and give no thought to any of their customers.

 

They charge £25 for a same day advance even though the banks offer it for free nowadays under the faster payment system which every other payday loan company use. They are a complete rip off so please don't use them unless you have no other option. But still i would stay away from them.

 

You can also see from the emails below that i was accepted for the loan if it's not for me being off work sick today, and then they turn me down because i raised a query. Please read below my emails in blue and theirs in red.

 

 

We can lend our money to however we wish, and should we choose not to deal with someone due to their attitude, we are well within our rights to do so, as the OFT will tell you.

 

Thanks

 

Kind regards!

 

From:

Sent: 09 August 2012 15:15

To: Info Swift

Subject: Re: Loan status

 

That's fine i will see what the Office of Fair Trading, and Financial Ombudsman, and every consumer advice site have to say about the way you treat customers that make a complaint.

 

Thanks,

 

 

From: Info Swift

To:

Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2012, 15:20

Subject: RE: Loan status

 

Tamer

 

We request that you take your business elsewhere, we will no longer be processing your application.

 

Many thanks

 

Kind regards

 

Swift Money

From:

Sent: 09 August 2012 14:42

To: Info Swift

Subject: Re: Loan status

 

I'm sorry i wasn't aware that i am not allowed to make a complaint or raise a point or query if you wished to do so.

 

Tamer

 

From: Info Swift

To:

Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2012, 14:47

Subject: RE: Loan status

 

 

 

This is the second time you have made a complaint about our service.

 

Please be aware that our underwriting rules are in place for good reason, and will not be reviewed.

 

If you wish to apply when you are back in work please feel free to do so, if you are displeased with the service then please be reminded it is optional and there are other lenders that may operate differently should you choose to use them.

 

Regards

From:

Sent: 09 August 2012 14:22

To: Info Swift

Subject: Re: Loan status

 

Thanks for the reply. But i find the rules to be strange and contradicting. It's OK to be on holiday but yet not OK to be off sick even though i'm still fully employed and in current employment with my employer. I mean i am back on Monday and can apply for the loan and be accepted for it and then go off sick for a recurring illness or a new illness, how will that affect my loan then?

 

I think your rules need to be reviewed. Holidays, and sicknesses need to treated the same way and not separately from one another.

 

Thanks,

 

From: Info Swift

To:

Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2012, 13:46

Subject: RE: Loan status

 

Hi

 

I still havent been able to get through - I havent tried for an hour so I will try again in a moment - fingers crossed

 

Many thanks

 

From:

Sent: 09 August 2012 13:38

To:

Subject: Loan status

 

I would like to get an update on my loan application. I have tried calling but the line is constantly engaged.

 

Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android

Edited by Ell-enn
Removed name and libellous comment
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would remove your name from the posts. We don't advise on taking a payday loan out unless it's absolutely necessary and no offence but they can accept / decline whoever they please, they probably think that if you're off sick or on long term you might only get half pay - i would say that it's a responsible decision and it's about time that these companies stop throwing money at a wall and hoping it sticks - you cant have it both ways, either they responsibly lend (some complain) or they irresponsibly lend (a major issue at the moment) and most complain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have removed your name from the emails in your post so you can't be identified. I have also removed a comment which could be seen as libellous.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...