Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Danish motoring incident law help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't know whether you can help or not, and whether you know anything about Danish law.

 

Just before Christmas last year, XXX was going to work on his bike but didn't have the back light on it as he couldn't find it.

 

Instead of going on the bike path, he decided to go down the back streets. A policeman on a motorbike pulled him up, and wrote a ticket for XXX for 46 euros. He told XXX the paperwork for it would be sent to him in the post so he could pay the fine.

 

He finally received the paperwork a week ago, this time the fine has increased to 128 euros.

The reason being he didn't have the paperwork to pay it straight away.

Because the police have only just sent him the paperwork, he has to pay the increase.

 

He did have a reflector on the back of his bike, I don't know whether that would make any difference.

 

He's told the police that he has a young baby, but they said he still has to pay it in one go.

He's told me that 128 euros, is four days wages.

 

I would be very grateful if you could offer any advice that might help him.

If it had happened over here, he would probably have just got a warnin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Newmoses,

 

I am not an expert but have a little bit of cycling knowledge from Amsterdam (try looking at www/amsterdam.angloinfo.com/information/37/cycling.asp).

 

Hopefully someone with more knowledge will be along later......

 

It is compulsory to have front and rear lights fitted in Denmark and must be used in 'bad visibility' or at night. Cyclists must use the cycle path (if there is one) at all times (unless it has a blue sign - optional). If there is no path then a cyclist can use the road.

 

Has your friend tried talking with the local police about the fine increase and lack of paperwork being provided?

 

Good luck

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't use Euros in Denmark do they?

 

Either way, Danes mostly speak excellent English and I'm sure they'd explain everything very clearly to your friend if he asks at the town hall or a police station, as suggested. He should do this without further delay.

 

I'm not sure they'd have much discretion after seven months though - European traffic fines are often payable immediately and if he was given a ticket at the time, why has he left it so long? A fine will almost certainly still be payable at one level or another.

 

You might get away with a warning for a cycling offence in the UK but you could still just as easily be given a penalty, and if it wasn't paid within a fairly short time, you'd get a summons to see your friendly local magistrates about paying a higher penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they use euros in Denmark and I.m sure Moses that's hardly your main concern.

 

If you want help in English from ppl familiar with the system in Denmark, try

http://www.foreignersindenmark.dk/forum

 

I am sure there must be a way of ensuring that the person in question is not subjected to further penalties if the delay was the police's fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the advice.I messed up with the country though.It was Holland, so Dutch law, not Danish.Don't know if this will have any bearing on the advice given.My friend apparently was given a ticket for a 46 Euro fine,but was told that he had to wait for the paperwork to arrive so he could pay the fine.It was not received until last week,some near 7 months since the incident took place, and because it hadn't been paid earlier, the fine was increased to 128 Euros.It was the fault of the police because they delayed sending the paperwork out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Netherlands the police can administer a fine on the spot which can be a lower amount it's paid immediately, when they issue a receipt. If it's not paid at once the full amount becomes payable when the paperwork is sent through.

 

When I lived in Germany it wasn't unusual for Dutch fines to take weeks or months to appear, though I don't know if the same applied to domestic cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Danish motoring incident law help
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...