Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Buchanan Clark & Wells/N Power


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, just after some advice on how best to handle this company.

 

We moved house last December and submitted our gas meter reading to N/Power. We didn't hear anything for months until we eventually got a bill through. We queried the bill as it had the supply period ending on 08/03/2012 which would be just over 2 months since we left. They got back to us telling us that they had used the meter reading we gave them.

 

So, yesterday we got our first letter from BCW in the form of a FINAL NOTICE with the same inaccurate supply period.

 

However, they have decided that on top of the bill they are going to add another 12.5% ' to reimburse our clients for the costs incurred in recovering this debt'.

 

This adds another £102.22 which I think is probably the biggest admin fee I have ever encountered.

 

What is the best approach with these people and has anyone else had any similar problems with them?

 

Thanks - Lee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you do here, is enter into an official complaint with Npower and at the end of this, purely pay what you owe for your usage to Npower and no admin fees or charges. Don't have anything to do with BCW, apart from writing to them, once your complaint is registered with Npower, saying that you are going down the Npower complaints route. BCW then have to back out and stop any collection activity.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you do here, is enter into an official complaint with Npower and at the end of this, purely pay what you owe for your usage to Npower and no admin fees or charges. Don't have anything to do with BCW, apart from writing to them, once your complaint is registered with Npower, saying that you are going down the Npower complaints route. BCW then have to back out and stop any collection activity.

 

Thanks unclebulgaria67. We also need to look into the bill as we're not 100% they're telling us the truth about using the reading we submitted and might be using one from the next tenants. Otherwise surely they would have closed the account in Dec'11 instead March 12.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks unclebulgaria67. We also need to look into the bill as we're not 100% they're telling us the truth about using the reading we submitted and might be using one from the next tenants. Otherwise surely they would have closed the account in Dec'11 instead March 12.

 

If a debt is in dispute it has to go back to the original creditor, for obvious reasons, that they are the only ones that are able to deal with it.

 

I am sure that you will be able to resolve with NPower and just pay what you owe for your usage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...