Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC Mortgage PPI - advice appreciated!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all :smile:

 

I am looking into making a claim against HSBC for mis-selling insurance when I took out my mortgage but am unsure if I have a case or how to start.

 

I took out a 100% mortgage with HSBC in July 2006. When I went in to sign the paperwork I was told that their insurance plan which would offer payment if I was sick or injured and life assurance were a compulsory part of the mortgage and I needed to sign up for this too.

 

In November 2010 whilst talking to a colleague in work I was told that this was a waste of money as my employer provides a death in service grant which would cover the mortgage and sickness cover for a year too! I promptly cancelled the cover deeming it unnecessary. I interestingly did not hear from the bank telling me the compulsory cover was no longer in place!

 

My complaints are

 

1) the advisor made it clear it was compulsory when I now know that this is not the case. It was made clear at the time that the mortgage would not happen without the cover.

2) the advisor did not mention I could shop elsewhere for this cover.

3) the advisor did not check to see if the cover was necessary due to my employment.

 

I do not have any of the original paper work (stupid I know) apart from the bank statements showing payment to HSBC LIFE UK for payments of approx £45 a month

 

Could you offer your thoughts please of if I can / should claim and if so perhaps how I would go about this?

 

If you have had a similar (and successful!) experience with this then any letters you have used would be great if you do not mind sharing!

 

Thank you in advance.

 

Naith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can claim.

 

It's good that you have a record of the payments. Enter them into the spreadsheet attached.

 

Go to the fos website, download a consumer questionnaire and complete it.

 

Send the completed questionnaire and a copy of the completed spreadsheet to the lender together with a brief covering letter.

 

They will have 8 weeks to investigate and give you a final decision on your complaint.

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the quick reply - this is perfect.

 

I am worried that I do not have an account number - as I still hold the mortgage and account with them is it really necessary?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there an account number mentioned on your bank statements each month when the payment goes out?

 

If not just a quick call to them should get you the account number.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just checked and there is no number attached to it. I have completed the form and in the account number section have asked them to source from their records.

 

Will post tomorrow with a covering letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to add my thanks for your quick response!

 

This is my statement of why I am unhappy

 

 

Whilst talking to a colleague in November 2010 he told me I was wasting my money as we have equivalent cover through our employer. I then cancelled the policy.

 

It is now clear to me that this policy, both the life assurance and income protection, was grossly missold for the following reasons.

 

1) The information that the policies were compulsory in order to receive the mortgage was a lie.

2) Clearly given the above, there was no discussion that if I did need cover I could use other providers

3) The advisor did not check if I had alternative cover. Indeed, I believe that he suspected that my employer provided these benefits and as such deliberately avoided asking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooops...careful with your wording....

 

In point 1 remove the word "lie".

 

In point 3 remove the bit about what you suspect the advisor did i.e. deliberately avoided asking.

 

Stick to facts.

 

1 You were told the insurance was compulsory.

2 You were not informed that, had you needed it, cover was available from other providers at possible less cost.

3 Your employer provided enough cover so you did not need or want the cover.

4 The advisor did not carry out a full needs assessment.

 

Phone them in the morning to see of you can get the account number....it may speed things up if you can provide it

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi naithr, apologies for getting back to you late. Follows IMS advice and you'll be ok. I put my complaint into HSBC, but showed I alsready had an HSBC life policy for Income protection and that I was covered through work. HSBC paid out without any issues. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A month later and I get a reply.

 

I am told that this is not a complaint regarding PPI but regarding a Mortgage Protection Plan and an Income Protection Plan,

informing me that they aim to respond in full within 8 weeks and asking if I would like to not proceed with my complaint!

 

I am today going to reply with the same letter and reasons before with the product complained about the Mortgage Protection Plan and Income Protection Plan.

 

Does this sound about right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi naithr

 

I too have a claim with my HSBC mortgage protection plan inc critical illness plan.

 

After a month I got a reply stating that they were investigating my claim and woul reply again in another 4 weeks (total 8 weeks from my claim being raised).

 

They did not not mention a difference between PPI and the Mortgage Protection plan and did not give me a kind offer of retracting my claim!

 

I'm sure the helpful guys and girls on here will help u on this one

as this might just be a fob off to make you question whether your claim is valid!?

 

I'm sure ims21 will be able to advise if the mortgage protection plan is different to PPI

and whether your claim is stil a valid one!

 

Good luck to you

- I will follow your thread with interest and keep an eye on mine as it looks like we are in the same boat!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it is the same

 

they are just putting up a smoke screen

go get 'em!!

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx :)

 

Liam - I do feel your pain that they have not been generous enough to ask you if you want to retract your complaint :)

 

I wonder if this is a new ploy - I sent my initial letter on the 4th July - and received a reply with the same 4 week/8week response you did. when did you initially write to them?

 

Naith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx :)

 

Liam - I do feel your pain that they have not been generous enough to ask you if you want to retract your complaint :)

 

I wonder if this is a new ploy - I sent my initial letter on the 4th July - and received a reply with the same 4 week/8week response you did. when did you initially write to them?

 

Naith

 

naithrI wrote to them on 18th July and received a letter within a week confirming my claim and that they would look into it. After 4 weeks they sent the last letter so they now have until 14th Sept 2012 to conclude their investigation. So far no complaints about how HSBC are conducting themselves but will have another 4 weeks to wait on the final ruling. Has this been the same for you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Liam. Sorry for the slow reply - I was away.

 

My initial letter was sent on the 7th of July so my decision is due very soon. Again the original reply to say they had received my letter was very quick, and then a few weeks later I revived a second reply correcting the name of the complaint and asking if I wanted to change my mind :)

 

Time marches on...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Liam. Sorry for the slow reply - I was away.

 

My initial letter was sent on the 7th of July so my decision is due very soon. Again the original reply to say they had received my letter was very quick, and then a few weeks later I revived a second reply correcting the name of the complaint and asking if I wanted to change my mind :)

 

Time marches on...

 

naithrThe decision should be very soon - I await with interest to the outcome! Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Liam - sorry for the slow reply - busy week!

 

Letter arrived Tuesday - complaint rejected :(

 

reasons given were

 

1 You were told the insurance was compulsory. - They can find no evidence to support this

2 You were not informed that, had you needed it, cover was available from other providers at possible less cost.I was apparently given a letter stating that the advisor would only be recommending HSBC products

3 Your employer provided enough cover so you did not need or want the cover.in regards to life and critical illness, they state that they do not recommend employer in service death grant to pay off mortgage and that it does not cover the critical illness element. In terms of the payment protection , they do not really mention it in the letter.

4 The advisor did not carry out a full needs assessment.I filled in a questionnaire which was my needs assessment according to their records.

 

Questionnaire or not, I was still sold policies which I did not want, thus the reason I cancelled them in 2010 and did not replace them with similar! Off to the FSO...

 

Naith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Liam - sorry for the slow reply - busy week!

 

Letter arrived Tuesday - complaint rejected :(

 

reasons given were

 

1 You were told the insurance was compulsory. - They can find no evidence to support this

2 You were not informed that, had you needed it, cover was available from other providers at possible less cost.I was apparently given a letter stating that the advisor would only be recommending HSBC products

3 Your employer provided enough cover so you did not need or want the cover.in regards to life and critical illness, they state that they do not recommend employer in service death grant to pay off mortgage and that it does not cover the critical illness element. In terms of the payment protection , they do not really mention it in the letter.

4 The advisor did not carry out a full needs assessment.I filled in a questionnaire which was my needs assessment according to their records.

 

Questionnaire or not, I was still sold policies which I did not want, thus the reason I cancelled them in 2010 and did not replace them with similar! Off to the FSO...

 

Naith

Hi naithr - sorry to hear of the complaint being rejected! Looks like they are gonna play hard ball with you - keep up the fight! I'm sort of expecting the same response in regards to the critical illness plan but I still feel that the repayment protection policy they sold you that would have provided the same cover as your employer would needs looking at again (probably why they didn't mention it) I'm sure the more experienced people on here can advise you better tho! Having read my policies HSBC do state that their advisors will only give advise on their own products and policies. As for the questionnaire that u apparantly filled out - if it was the same as mine it was a 1 on 1 chat (called a Financial Planning Review) at the same tiime as the mortgage was appplied for and THEY gave recommendations as to what cover you needed with the mortgage based on your financial, employment and lifestyle requirements - basically you need to sign up to our recommendations if you want the mortgage to get approved. Dont give up hope - I still have a copy of this Financial Planning Review Report - so maybe you can ask HSBC for that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...

Hi naithr

 

How did you get on with the fos?

I am considering pursuing HSBC for the same PPI and for the same reasons you have cited, because they did tell me i would have to take out their products when i got my mortgage with them.

Any info would be a great help, but I am going to send the forms to them anyway.

Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

op has not been on cag since their last post

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...