Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Question about selling my house.


Deimos
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4359 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I posted about my issues with a co owner of this house, back in June 2011.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...father-at-risk

 

To cut a long story short

 

I co own a house, with my father and uncle

 

The house has a tenants in common house deed, it was purchased for £180,000

My father put down a £40,000 deposit, making the mortgagelink3.gif some £700 a month, for £140,000. (£20,000 was also spent by my father and I, on updating the house)

The mortgagelink3.gif was supposed to be paid by myself and my uncle.

The uncle stopped paying his share back in October 2010, we didn't find out till April 2011, as he'd been intercepting the mail and phone callslink3.gif, we only got wind of the problem when he happened to be out one day and WE got the mail about the arrears (Some £4500ish)

 

The uncle moved out in May 2011 and we've been paying off the arrears and mortgage, by renting out two rooms in our home.

 

Here's the problem.

 

We have no trust deeds setup on the property/equity, which I believe we should've got when we purchased it.

 

We obviously weren't expecting things to go pear shaped, but I want to sell the house, because we barely scrape by each month and we can't remortgage to get the uncle removed from the deeds, because my dad is now to old to get a mortgage in his name AND because all our credit has been ruined by him keeping the arrears hidden from us for half a year.

 

But, if we sell and have no trust deeds, does that mean each of us gets an equal share? Or would my father get back his £40,000? and the £20,000 spent on updating?

 

My uncle never put anything into the house, money wise, so I'm wondering if there's a way to sell, without him getting anything, given how much of a mess he's left us in

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any documentation showing the initial paymemt made by your Father? If so you may find that this could help in him getting the deposit back before the rest of the sale revenue is distributed.

Normalyl in a tennancy in common in the absence of a trust each person owns an equal share, with a trust dead then it would show who owns what percentage of the property and if there are any deposits etc to be repaid from the sale proceeds.

Are you in contact with your uncle, if so in return for you not pursuing him for his share of the mortgage payments he may sign his share over to you,

You really need to see a Solicitor to deal with this.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, sadly no, I can't seem to find anything in the mortgage stuff about a deposit.

 

If he could get a hold of his bank statement for 2005, do you think that would suffice? And/or contacting the mortgage company perhaps, they might have records of the original deposit?

 

Thanks for your help so far :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The mortgage company would have details of what was paid but it wouldnt say whose money it actually was as it would have been a joint application. I really think get what evidence you can from the mortgage co, bank etc and go to a solicitor. Trying to sell property and deal with financial issues surroundinga property when it is anything less than strightforward is fraught with problems.

I still say try and approach your uncle and get him to agree to forego his share if he hasnt paid anything,( if he agrees get it drawn up legally right away), but please see a solicitor even if its just a quick free 1/2 hour as you need some advice in the absence of an official trust document.

The only other thing I can think of is was the deposit a loan by your father to you and your uncle and if so was there any paperwork drawn up at the time either formally or informally, also I am not sure but you may be able to put a charge against your uncles share if you can get a court order to show he owes you money, although thats a bit of a long shot, but if you could then you would be a prefferential creditor after the mortgage has been paid off, so you or your father would get the 40k back, but the remainder would still be split 3 ways.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the good thing is, the house was originally in my name, my fathers and my brothers

 

My brother moved out and the uncle took over my brothers share of the mortgage.

 

The problem is, we can't get him off the house deeds or mortgage, without re mortgaging, which we can't do, so I don't think we could get him to agree to hand over his share? Not sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to be getting conflicting information from different sources

 

Others have said the money would be split three ways evenly, because the money was used to purchase the house, it wasn't added AFTER the purchase (e.g. for an extension, conservatory etc)

 

Also, if one of the parties refuses to sell, can the sale be forced?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...