Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Amy vs Alliance Leicester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Guest Battleaxe

Go for it, we are with you all the way. insist that you get all the notes also not just the statements. it will be an enlightening read to see what they have written about you. i still haven't got my notes and this was the basis of my complaint to the Information Commissioner. I hope A & L are soon brought to book.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Well how has it been going ?

I have just had a letter saying that they think their charges have been fair and that they can not see that they need to repay anything ! So i have sent the letter before action letter, starting to worry im not going to get anything.

 

Regards

 

Lesley:|

 

Hello all, I have just sarted a claim against A&L i sent the first letter today asking for all transactions and bank charges over the past 6 years.

 

Im really excited about the whole thing, just hope i get my money back.

I'll keep you all posted.
:p
:p

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well how has it been going ?

I have just had a letter saying that they think their charges have been fair and that they can not see that they need to repay anything ! So i have sent the letter before action letter, starting to worry im not going to get anything.

 

Regards

 

Lesley:|

 

 

 

Don't worry too much.. that is one of their bog-standard responses. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received another letter after I sent my letter before action. It says that they think the charges are correct in accordance with their charging policy, so they are unable to refund me.

 

Wot ! :eek:

 

Do I now take them to court or send them the letter before action again.

 

Any idea's

 

A very worried Lesley :confused:

 

Hi Amy, I have today posted my Letter Before Action after receiving a bog standard response to my first letter, I wish you luck in your fight, you keep me up to date with how its going and I will do the same.

geordiegirl99

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received another letter after I sent my letter before action. It says that they think the charges are correct in accordance with their charging policy, so they are unable to refund me.

 

Wot ! :eek:

 

Do I now take them to court or send them the letter before action again.

 

Any idea's

 

A very worried Lesley :confused:

 

 

 

That sounds like the letter that i got in response to my original letter requesting refund of charges. Could the letter and your LBA crossed in the post?

 

If it was me i would just stick to the time limit that you gave them in the LBA that you sent, and then start the moneyclaim process; but i'm no expert! :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, I have received a reply to my LBA, saying no can do and they can no longer assist me any further 'their words not mine', apparently you have to wait until the 14 days are up then file your claim, but you can start preparing your claim, you can go to the money claim website and look at the FAQs. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am at the same stage as you, but today I ha a letter from A & L customer services saying theyhad been ring to phone me but I wasn't hee. They asked me to send a form back telling them the date and time I would be in.

I really dont want to talk to them on the phone.

Have any of you got his sort of lerrer or had A & L phone them?

Alliance prelim 7th Jan £3270

sod off letter 14th Jan

LBA 19/1/07

N1 taken to local court 6/2/07

Offer recived part amount but already in court

WON! WON!full amount !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D

 

Barclays prelim £1973 7th Jan

No can do letter 14/1/07

LBA 16/1/07'

part offer received and refused 1/2/07

N1 issued 15/2/07

letter received re defence - they have till 22/3/07

Defence received - 25/3/07

AQ received to be back by 11/4/07:-(

 

Lloyds TSB trustcard S.A.R - 12th Jan

claim for £126 prelim 12/2/07

sod off letter recd.

LBA 17/3/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...