Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Since I posted the letter in early June 2012, I heard nothing from Mbna.

So I decided to ring em, the the person tells me the letter has been received, but decision still remains same(reading of screen).

I then asked him to send me a reply to this letter.

He advised me , that will be sent out today.

 

I did clarify with him on there refusal reply dated 1 may 2012, why did you put down that I requested the Ppi in august 1996.

He tells me that my card was actually authorised to be used in august, but Ppi was ticked in July 1996 , when contract was signed, but was surprised why that was on reply letter.

 

Can you please advise me, what step do I take next.

 

Please help

 

Re: Payment Protection Insurance on Account Number XXXXXXXXXXXX

03 June 2012

Dear Sir / Madam

Thank you for your letter regarding PPI on above account.

 

In late July 1996, i saw an advert for your credit card, on this there were choices to make like 'type of card required' etc.

 

Having never at that early age applied for credit before, this was new and confusing.

 

I therefore rang the helpline seeing 'PLEASE RING IF YOU NEED HELP COMPLETING THIS FORM'.

 

Your Staff then went through the whole application with me, of which i have a copy inc notes i took at the time, as i keep all important records inc all your statements.

 

Your staff enquired about my living arrangements and my work status and concluded i should apply for a Visa Silver Card=M07002960.

 

However, to ensure the application was accepted, I was told i must enrol on the PPI scheme.

 

I now, following the media coverage concerning mis-sale of PPI, realise this is of course a mis-sale

and i actually had no need for it at all, other than a commission bonus for the operator.

 

Unless you can prove to me by transcript of the actual telephone conversation

that i was not co-ersed into selecting the PPI, rather than 'assuming' your staff folowed their script.

 

I demand the return of all my PPI payments plus the interest you charged forthwith

in-line with FOS guidelines.

 

disgruntled customer

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Since I posted the letter in early June 2012, I heard nothing from MBNA.

So I decided to ring em, the the person tells me the letter has been received, but decision still remains same(reading of screen).

I then asked him to send me a reply to this letter.

He advised me , that will be sent out today.

 

I did clarify with him on there refusal reply dated 1 may 2012, why did you put down that I requested the PPI in august 1996.

He tells me that my card was actually authorised to be used in august, but Ppi was ticked in July 1996 , when contract was signed, but was surprised why that was on reply letter.

 

Can you please advise me, what step do I take next.

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

I already have that, yes I ticked it, but when I filled the form I got help from the operator, on a helpline number provided on that form. This was a confusing form and was advised if I don't tick, then my application won't be approved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I already have that, yes I ticked it, but when I filled the form I got help from the operator, on a helpline number provided on that form. This was a confusing form and was advised if I don't tick, then my application won't be approved.

 

How do I make a complaint to fos, never dealt with them.

 

Ask them to provide a copy of the alleged ticked application form.

 

Alternatively pass it to fos to deal with

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...