Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice re PPI's please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am looking for some advice on what to do next.

I must admit I am not that up to date on these PPI’s so hopefully someone will be able to give me some info.

 

I had 2 credit cards with Barclaycard. One opened in 2002 and 2008.

I filled out the correct forms but have had a reply saying that

“we have completed our investigation and we are unable to locate a policy in your name. As a result your complaint cannot be upheld”.

 

As I don’t have any documentation – do I just leave it at that?

 

Also can I apply for any late payment fees or default sums??

 

Also Vanquis - I received a reply

 

“I can confirm that the Repayment option plan was discussed following approval of the account.

The information provided by our Reps clearly describes the features, benefits and costs of the plan.

It would have been on that call that it was agreed to have the product added to the account.

The info was confirmed in wiritng and the charge for the plan has also been itemised on each monthly statement that has been issued since the product was applied.

 

In addition, from review of the account I note that the Repayment option plan has previously been activated.

Therefore the charges which have been applied to monthly statement since the ROP was accepted have been correctly applied

and as such I am unable to agree reimbursement of these charges.

 

Please be assured that the ROP has been removed from the account.

 

When I was on maternity leave last year Vanquis froze my account.

 

In the envelope they sent me, was also a letter for someone else.

 

Again, can you apply for any late payment charges/over limit charges.?

 

Monument – received reply – enclosing T&Cs and a Rapid Reply card signed by myself in 2003.

Letter states – We hope this letter has been helpful in addressing your queries and we consider our credit card agreement with you to be fully enforceable and that there is no dispute.

 

Just looking for someone to put me in the right direction please or if I should stop now.

 

Apologies for the non-knowledge!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

With regard to the Barclaycard, have you got any statements showing that PPI was paid? How do you know that PPI was on the Barclaycard accounts?

 

If you have late payment fees or over-limit fees then they can be reclaimed. Again you will need statements.

 

If you have no documentation then you should send a Subject Access Request (SAR) to the lender. There is a template in the CAG library, the link to which is at the top of every CAG page in green.

 

Vanquis ROP is also available fro reclaim of it was mis-sold although it does sound like you have had the benefit that the plan offers.

 

Again, with the Monument one, of you haven't got statements then SAR them to get the data.

 

Also do some reading around the PPI forums to get up to speed with what others are doing.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would also start a thread for each relaim!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...