Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I would confirm that anyway, as there is a separate sheet where I have to put in those details and my insurance number and driving licence number. That is on page 2 (page one is their allegations) then page three is a statement that you weren't the driver and space to give details who was driving. Page 4 is an empty sheet for a statement to explain the situation. So I will fill out my details as the driver on page 2, admitting I was driving at the time, and then attach my statement as above as a separate sheet. That should hopefully do it at this stage
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Benefits stopped whilst investigate telephone-based alegation of fraud ....innocent until guilty no longer the rule?


Slatted
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4375 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

On the subject of FP they could not offer or allow it for any reason last Thursday....the chap was most apologetic but something was afoot and he could not even say that it could be done Friday instead!!

 

And again if they have already sent the money, albeit late, they will not be "able" to recall it......believe me I have had the "simples" talk every fortnight and each time the outcome differs......:mad2:

 

Maybe telephone accusations suffice as "evidence" to some Decision Makers now?:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

And again if they have already sent the money, albeit late, they will not be "able" to recall it......believe me I have had the "simples" talk every fortnight and each time the outcome differs......mad2.gif

 

A payment can be recalled right up to 11.00 the day before its due to credit, later if you phone bank liason. I am sorry as you seem to be getting the runaround,

I just cant understand why some people make life hard for themselves (processers) , if a customer is due a payment then they are due, recall it if its late and FP it.

A FP now can be a clerical payment, the new system is ace compared to the old

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is off topic a bit now....but relevant as to payments....I hope that things are okay for my friend tomorrow...here's hoping.

 

My problem is that I ring the day the money is due because that is the day it doesnt reach my account and is the first time I know it to be late. Other times the "three hour" slot seems to be a problem as money seems "mysteriously" to suddenly be on its way to my bank.... and I suppose the hassle of a recall...it isnt them that needs the money after all! I would not be able to call "bank liaison" would I?

 

I know not all the same but even when I ring in advance and told all okay and pay will be on time it still happens and my phone bill is reflecting all those lovely 0845 calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assumptions yes, I even got it written on a peice of paper from the DWP for my own case.

 

They based their entire case against me on an assumption. We also have the fact ESA medicals are based on assumptions as well in regards to using wheelchairs.

 

I never said it was fact that they used assumption in her case tho, I just said what my view was that it was possible.

 

Can I ask what did they assume? Was it a living together.

I sincerely hope it wasnt a work allegation. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that whilst an investigation is being undertaken the only thing that can be used is an assumption.

 

But I am also saying that the assumption should be based on something more than word of mouth should it not? Would it not be necessary to prove income somehow?

 

And even if not my point is about how income is stopped entirely, with no Hardship payment or anything, whilst the investigation is undertaken, thus punishing prior to knowing the outcome.

 

It is not sufficient to say the money will be repaid if all okay because you cannot live on fresh air in the hope that you will get food later.....and remember no one is denying she is ill and undoubtedly this will not have helped that......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they said who is 'investigating' this allegation?

 

If it is the fraud section then usually benefit remains in payment until firm evidence is obtained and a person is interviewed. If someone fails to attend for an interview and does not contact them then their benefit would more than likely be suspended.

 

I cannot imagine any scenario where a fraud investigator would suspend benefit without first obtaining evidence. It just isn't right and not the way that they work.

I am beginning to think that an over zealous benefit processor has not followed the correct procedure.

 

I must admit that I have got a bit lost in this thread as to who has been spoken to but a telephone call needs to be made to either find out the fraud investigator who has suspended the benefit (and that should be shown on the system) or speak to a supervisor and ask who has authorised the suspension of the benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There would have to be a benefit processor and EO involved here at least, the processor has no power of suspension and would have to give it to the line manager to apply the suspension.

Fraud do ring up and ask the EO to suspend a claim but we have to note this in the notepad and theres is always a direct line telephone call number for the fraud officer put in the note pad when we do this. If the customer rings we give them the number to ring...

I know fraud will suspend a case if they cant get in touch with the customer ie they will not attend an interview, but the OP has had an interview.

Its not the way compliance works as well, its a mystery :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure what is going on but I do know my friend was called in to the local Jobcentre for an interview after her first payment was stopped and the Law Centre rep was there too.

 

I wish I had been well enough to see her and the letter but that is life...I will see it soon and she has agreed to let me help with a complaint so that is something.

 

She has not had any money until today and, guess what?, she has only been paid £120!!! she doesn't know why and is waiting for a callback (good old three hours again). All her calls have been to the BDC in St Austell as far as I know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask what did they assume? Was it a living together.

I sincerely hope it wasnt a work allegation. :(

 

Basically I didnt get a letter for a medical assessment, I then missed that assessment, I was then found fit for work.

 

Whan I appealed and asked for reconsideration I found out the basis of their decision was they could assume on probability that I had actually recieved the letter and as such I didnt have good reason, I did eventually get it overturned tho after a lot of work. It wasnt easy and I did have evidence of other letters with wrong postcodes on and such including my MP as a witness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She has not had any money until today and, guess what?, she has only been paid £120!!! she doesn't know why and is waiting for a callback (good old three hours again). All her calls have been to the BDC in St Austell as far as I know.

 

And now it is six hours and she has heard nothing so is going to have to ring them again..she only has a mobile phone but at least pays a bit extra to have 0845 included in minutes but she only has so many....

 

I have every sympathy for the staff at BDC because I can only imagine how busy they are but having to keep calling them is costly and when short of money or, in the case of my friend, having no income, it just takes the mick....

Link to post
Share on other sites

She has not had any money until today and, guess what?, she has only been paid £120!!! she doesn't know why and is waiting for a callback (good old three hours again). All her calls have been to the BDC in St Austell as far as I know.

 

And now it is six hours and she has heard nothing so is going to have to ring them again..she only has a mobile phone but at least pays a bit extra to have 0845 included in minutes but she only has so many....

 

I have every sympathy for the staff at BDC because I can only imagine how busy they are but having to keep calling them is costly and when short of money or, in the case of my friend, having no income, it just takes the mick....

 

This makes me so mad :mad2:

How do they get away with it, we are shot if we miss the three hour dead line.

Ring back ask for an Esculation call you will be rung back in less then an hour

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that we now have to wait so long to speak to anyone to ask to escalate the call that we have to keep giving up! No one recognises how much money we spend on calls to the BDC over things that are not our fault and how long we have to hear that piggin classical music!!

 

I have a landline to which I pay an extra £3 a month to allow up to three hours (I think) of calls to 0845 and 0844 numbers. My friend has already used almost all her minutes for the whole month and spent ages just trying to speak to someone to start the process again!

 

Escalation is okay except that she has a GP appointment in the morning and you know how sods law will work!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this probem, not on benefits now but made umpteen calls about a jobgrant, have just had my phone bill it is enormous. I deal with St Austell and to be fair always got a call back but it was always a different answer to my question. I found out on here I wasnt getting the Jobgrant thanks to Flumps. Wished she had been dealing with my claim could have save a lot of money, heartache and grief

The trouble is they dont think we have anything better to do then wait in, two phone calls equates to six hours of your life. And another thing a bit off topic just had my car quote now I am working it has gone down two hundred pounds. Apparently less of a risk now everything costs more money when you are out of work and havent got it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And another thing a bit off topic just had my car quote now I am working it has gone down two hundred pounds. Apparently less of a risk now everything costs more money when you are out of work and havent got it.

 

is this common place amongst insurance companies then? not heard of this before

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep...there was an item about it on the tv yesterday...cannot remember the name of the prog..the one with Gloria Hunnyford, Angela Rippon etc .....".......Britain".....my memory is getting worse..not age just stress I think!

 

...and also moneysavingexpert mentions it along with some further information. Apparently more time on hands, less money means more insurance fraud risk and "driving to interviews" mean more risk to cover!!:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

getting back to the original thread...my friend chased this morning and they just said they are snowed under with work and mentioned the redundancies that have taken place....typical planning on behalf of Govt....start the conversions from IB and then reduce staff because, of course, no one was going to complain if put in WRAG if had been on long term IB because unable to work!

 

I don't think they apologised for not having called back though

 

They promised to phone this afternoon after her appointment....she is waiting....but is not holding her breath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically I didnt get a letter for a medical assessment, I then missed that assessment, I was then found fit for work.

 

Whan I appealed and asked for reconsideration I found out the basis of their decision was they could assume on probability that I had actually recieved the letter and as such I didnt have good reason, I did eventually get it overturned tho after a lot of work. It wasnt easy and I did have evidence of other letters with wrong postcodes on and such including my MP as a witness.

 

Glad you won your appeal, see this a lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

getting back to the original thread...my friend chased this morning and they just said they are snowed under with work and mentioned the redundancies that have taken place....typical planning on behalf of Govt....start the conversions from IB and then reduce staff because, of course, no one was going to complain if put in WRAG if had been on long term IB because unable to work!

 

I don't think they apologised for not having called back though

 

They promised to phone this afternoon after her appointment....she is waiting....but is not holding her breath.

 

Groundhog Day again then I take it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And today she had to ring them again to be told they had no information for her and that she would have to wait until after the Bank Holiday. She has also been told her Tax Credit will not be paid until then...she normally gets on a Monday....I thought Bank Holidays had to be recognised and payments due paid before?

 

She has no money to survive over the long weekend.....she had to use all she got for repaying debts....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...