Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As I'm off on holiday on Wednesday and won't be around I'll bring things forward and be pessimistic and decide that Iceland won't cooperate.  There are two things to ponder. The private parking companies have a lot in common for obvious reasons.  But also some differences. Excel and its sister company VCS are by far the most litigious.  They take large numbers of motorists who don't pay them to court - perhaps the majority.  That's not because they have a good case.  Indeed their case is rubbish.  It's because, sadly, enough people are terrified of the idea of going to court and just pay up when the court papers arrive.  It's a numbers game to Excel/VCS. In cases where the motorist is in it for the long haul, Caggers win 85% of the time in court against Excel/VCS (yes, I did once go back and counted all the court cases over the previous 30 months).  But Excel/VCS take the odd defeat because of the mugs who just panic and pay.  So take this into account when deciding what to do. Secondly, without boring you with the reasons, I know about the world of local journalism.  Papers have great difficulty in filling their column inches.  If you do contact the local media there is a 100% chance that they will publish something and embarrass Iceland - and maybe get them to back down. Again, have a think if this is a road you want to to go down. If you don't win by Wednesday!  
    • Followed up with letter which is no surprise as I’m easy to find via electoral roll. Letter says we have been asked to recover from you on behalf f our client in Middle East x amount. if you believe you are not liable please contact us - yeah right! If you wish to make payment here are our client bank details which look genuine and relate directly to a Dubai bank. ” if you don’t engage our client may take further action” etc blah blah blah. its the same type phrases used by CWD/IDRWW/IDR etc…..   I ignored the email, blocked the text number and will wait to see if I receive any formal action via Mail but seems like the same tactic I’ve seen for 10 years plus and I’ve ignored all. just for people’s info
    • Hi. I expect the experts will be along later to advise you. In the meantime, I've amended your thread title to show the car park name and location. HB
    • i can instruct my gof to sit, but if it does is an entirely diff matter. WL are acting here as a DCA and are not the OWNER of the debt, lowells are, so jog on WL... until very very recent we've never seen lowells raise a scottish claim Lowell/Shoes SPC Claim Forfar Sheriff Court - Old Newday Credit Card. - Scotland Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Diagnostic check wrong


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi ,

Car , BMW 318i , failed it's MOT due to the ABS lights orange on dash so booked a diagnostic check at local garage (quoted £26) , went along and was sent to another garage as that one didn't have the correct equipment .....all good so far , went straight into the other garage , test done in 5 mins which showed both front ABS sensors faulty .

Asked price to fix , and was quoted £88+ vat each for the sensors NOT fitted , declined as I'd looked online and knew I could source them much cheaper ( 2 phone calls and got them for £28 each) .

Asked them how much they wanted for the diagnostic test expecting it to be around the £30 mark only to be stung for £60 .

Pretty peed off but ,hey thats garages for you .

Anyway , replaced sensors myself , easy job , one hex bolt and unplug and the sensors off , took a couple of hours tops with tea breaks .

But surprise ,surprise the ABS lights are still on .

Now I have to fork out for another diagnostic check , can I demand money back from the garage as they have supplied me with a wrong diagnostic check ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because the lights still on doesn't mean that the diagnostic is wrong, those cheap sensors could be the reason or the setting up at the wheel, or the wiring.

 

What are you saying , the carparts dealer is in the business of selling parts that don't actually work ? and the garage informed me that it was the sensors not the wiring . As for setting up at the wheel , replacing a sensor wasn't exactly rocket science .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even the most costly of things can be faulty on receipt. If the wire is open circuit then there will be no response from the sensor, there is no check to see if it's the wire or the sensor that is faulty, it just returns a 'sensor faulty'.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

...But surprise ,surprise the ABS lights are still on .

Now I have to fork out for another diagnostic check , can I demand money back from the garage as they have supplied me with a wrong diagnostic check ?

 

The ABS light will stay on until it is reset using the diagnostic equipment, but will come back on if it senses a fault.

 

It is quite rightly showing that an error has occurred sometime in the past. It needs resetting AFTER the sensor is fixed/replaced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He doesn't say if the garage tried resetting the fault, just that they did the test, i.e: read the error code from the ECU which said ABS sensors faulty.

 

If they did reset the error code, it would have come straight back on, as the sensors were still faulty.

 

Now that he has fixed the sensors, he wants to clear the error code, which means a trip to the dealers for an appointment with the diagnostic machine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He doesn't say if the garage tried resetting the fault, just that they did the test, i.e: read the error code from the ECU which said ABS sensors faulty.

 

If they did reset the error code, it would have come straight back on, as the sensors were still faulty.

 

Now that he has fixed the sensors, he wants to clear the error code, which means a trip to the dealers for an appointment with the diagnostic machine.

 

aahh , I see , so I'm gonna get stung for another £60 unless I can find another garage that'll do a diagnostic check and reset the error code a bit cheaper ( pretty sure that I read that these things check then reset themselves everytime the ignition is turned on ) . Many thanks .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another bunch of amateurs and pub mechanics me thinks. Conniff is right with what he says.

 

The problem here is, as usual, people relying on the diagnostic system and how it works. If the ECU registers a sensor fault it can be a number of problems.

A. A faulty sensor,

B. Faulty wiring

C. A fault in the ecu sensor circuit.

D. A fault in the component the sensor is looking for.

 

The system does not need re-setting if the repair has been carried out correctly. It works on the number of failures over a period of time.

 

There are two generally used systems, a serated wheel/hub and a magnetic ring. Failure of either of these items will show a sensor fault and you can change as many sensors as you like, it will still be there.

 

BMW from memory favour the serated wheel on the hub so give that a good clean if you can get to it.

 

Can't see how you can get any money back here as it seems to be a case of the blind leading the blind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...