Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tenant Break clause - Tenancy Agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

can anyone give me some advice on my legal right regarding the below please?

 

I have a standard tenancy agreement with 6 month break clause (1 month notice) a the condition that "the heating in the flat is not enjoyable for the Tenants as mutually agreed by the Landlord and Tennant"

 

This clause was put into place as the flat don t have central heating neither double glazing (back in 80/2010) -

following cold winters I have requested in several occasion to have the window replaced or for a secondary double glazing to be put in place but nevertheless the management agency attempts to insulate the flat with other cheaper solution no much did improve -

secondary double glazing were not put into place as the landlord want to sell the flat this summer.

 

Due to the very low rent I still have put up to live in the propriety and to pay more on heating to try to keep warm. This anyway did result in me been ill constantly and having to take time off work consequently.

 

Following been diagnosticate with Cervical Artois and Chronic Sinusitis I have tried to give my notice as I did not want o jeopardise my health any further.

 

Unfortunately the Management agency don t agree with us giving notice and they are stating that now is warm.

 

I am challenging that in the break clause isn t specificity that the temperature has to be agree to be enjoyable or that I have to allow additional time for repairs as this "has already been mutually agreed"

 

Can anyone give an opinion on our right?

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ros

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Heres some info in the meantime:- http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/homeandcommunity/privaterenting/repairsandstandards/dg_189195

 

Also read number 15 in my signature.

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers.

 

Thread has been moved to the correct forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The breakclause seems pretty straight forward to me and is in fact worded in your favour (assuming you have written it as worded).

 

Its clear that if you and the landlords cant agree that the temperature is acceptabe then you can serve one months notice. From what you have written, you and the landlords (agents) cant agree that the temperature is acceptable, therefore you have given one months notice. The fact that the agents think the temerature is acceptable is neither here nor there because the breakcaluse doesnt require their agreement, only their disagreement with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and thanks for your replies - I really appreciate your help.

 

- In response to Raydeitnu: I have been there since the 18th August 2010 - contract renewed under the same terms and condition (so including the Tenant Break) in 2011.

 

Expiry date of the contract 18/08.

 

- In response to Planner: here as the Tenant Break is written exactly :

 

"No less then 1 month such notice no to expire before the 19th November 2010" and " provided that this notice should only be effective in the event that at the expiry of such notice the heating within the propriety is below habitable enjoyment as mutually agreed by the Landlord and Tennant"

 

In my understanding as it said agreed this should mean past / done already? so no to be agreed now ?

 

The Management agency and Landlord are challenging that they were not aware of the problem (nerveless 2 years of email also were they were stating that there was noting else that could be done) plus the fact that now is not that cold ... but it was when the notice was given and they are not sleeping in the propriety so how they can judge?

Moreover as my fiscal condition are now not 100% perfect due to the cold in the past months the flat I surely will resent more than a fit person would - should not be at "my enjoyment " not their?

 

I am not sure I understand what you mean by" The fact that the agents think the temperature is acceptable is neither here nor there because the break-caluse doesn t require their agreement, only their disagreement with you"... sorry :-(

 

Thanks very much again

 

Ros

Link to post
Share on other sites

It certainly is not a standard break clause as it is purely dependant on the heating being below habitable enjoyment!

This would not apply now in the summer and even in winter it could be satisfied by installing lots of electric heaters ( at some cost to run ).

Has it got central heating? gas certificate.

If it is cold in winter have you got a damp problem?

It would seem the best solution would be to find somewhere else to live as it the tenancy is due run its course in August.

Is there any deposit involved and has it been protected and you have been advised as such.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

in reply to raydetinu:

 

there is no central heating or gas but just some electric hater that are very expensive to run. propriety is generally humid (bed sheet for example in winter were nearly wet at the touch) but there is no dump in the walls or anything.

 

The enjoyment of the heating should not be at my discretion not up to the opinion of the landlord (or at least is what I understand from this contract) as I live in the flat ? is not what the break clause state? "agreed" as past so should not be in dispute?

 

I have already give my notice(when 10 days a go was still 7 degree!) in fact the problem is that the letting agency and landlord don t agree and I don t want to loose my deposit so I was writing to ask what were exactly my legal right in this specific situation.....

 

Please let me know what do you think....

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO you cannot implemnt or rely on that clause to release you from the contract.

However if you do leave and do not pay the rent to end of the term, you could certainly lose you deposit and LL may sue for the unpaid rent.

You could counterclaim for the return of your deposit, so it would be upto a judge to decide.

Is the deposit you paid protected and have you been notified of the details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

in reply to raydetinum: many thanks for your reply - can you please advise why I can t enforce the break clause that is in the contract?

what make this invalid?

 

Reason for giving the notice is that the flat is cold and window are not sealed - this was following been diagnositcate with cronic sinusitis so why the law state that i need to soffer fisically and be penalized finacially if the insulation of the flat are not suitable for my health? (and we are going back to the clause "enjoyment" of the flat)

 

Thanks for your time

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason IMO you cant invoke clause now is that you have been there nearly two years and if it was a problem you should of used it in the first winter, you cant use it now in Summer when heating is not a problem? but that would be up to a judge to decide.

Is the deposit protected? if not, you may have something to negotiate with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...