Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

JSA 6 month review


AnnaR.
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have been searching on this forum but I have not found anything on this, I hope someone can help.

I am on Jobseekers' Allowance for the first time ever, and I recently went through the 13 week review process. This basically consisted of me having to sign on every week for six weeks, with a different job advisor than the usual one.

 

Now that I'm done with this, I have found out there is a 6 month review as well, which, unless I find a job first, I'll have to do.

 

I am wondering if this will mean I will have to sign on every week for another 6 weeks again, could somebody let me know how this works?

 

My advisor told me, on the last day of my 6 week weekly appointments, that on this new review I'd have my jobseekers' agreement reviewed, but I couldn't get any more details on what's really going to happen. Any further information would be appreciated too.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there

the reviewed is just a wee meeting with a advisor to make sure you dont need anymore help looking for a job

and you are still looking for the same jobs you said at the start of youre claim

you get one every 3 months

it will last about 20mins but the letter you will get will say it can last a hour but it will not .

hope this helps .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the reply, that's very helpful. So it's just going to be one meeting then, no having to sign on every week once more?

Will I still continue signing on every fortnight as usual? (Sorry but that is something important for me and I'd really like to know)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you have done the signing every week you will not do it again .(well i have not had too )

if you end up still on jsa after about 9-12 months they will try and send to to job work shops etc .

but youre next meeting will be fine .

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a relief for me because to be honest I find it very stressful to have to go to the jobcentre. I know it may sound silly, but I get very nervous and can barely sleep the night before! So I really had a hard six weeks when I knew I had to be there every Tuesday. I'd rather be working anywhere and I hope I will not have to be doing this 6 month review at all and have already signed off.

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on your adviser, they can actually ask you to attend as frequently as needed depending on how much support you need.

 

 

Ok, so there are no fixed rules about this I assume. How do they evaluate whether someone needs more or less support?

Also, does this review consist of what max99 said, just one meeting, no change in job search, etc? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At your 6 month review you will be expected to open up your job search further to include all jobs you are qualified and capable of doing. The amount of support you need is agreed between you and your adviser, but for example of you are looking for you normal job search and you aren't finding the vacancies to apply for then you may need additional support to help you find another type of job to apply for or if you are lacking in work experience for that role you could be referred for work experience, tbh it is something only you and your adviser can agree and work out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...