Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

High court walking posession arrived today


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I'm hoping I could be given some guidance.

 

I received paperwork today from the high court:

 

. form 55 - notice of seizure

. walking possession agreement

 

The amount is for 16K which is a debt owed to a supplier by my company.

 

In short, we were never paid by our own client, and hence the debt has fallen at our feet.

 

My company hasn't traded for near 2 years now (though its been kept active for future use) and unless things pick up pretty soon,

I'm going to apply for job seekers allowance.

 

The recession single handily ruined my business and all my financial freedom.

 

The bailiff hasn't entered my home (yet) and I haven't signed anything,

I spoke on the phone to him and he said I need to send a proposal of payment to The Sheriffs Office.

 

I'm wondering what to do next?

My company is dormant so should I, at first,

strike it off?

Or should I consider bankruptcy/liquidation.

 

I don't know the best course.

 

Though the debt is registered against the company, the address they attended is my home.

 

I rent the property and as such nothing, apart from my clothes and a TV, belong to me

- how can I be sure they wont attend to take my landlords goods?

 

Should I email a copy of my apartment itinerary to prove 95% of what is here, isn't mine.

 

My vehicle isn't registered in my name or company but I guess I should think about moving it whilst this goes on.

I basically have no assets.

 

Is the best course to register unemployed and make this known to the claimant, go bankrupt or make an offer of repayment as best I can right now.

 

I need to make the claimant understand that any offer I do make, is going to be the only amount I can afford.

 

Certainly if I go bankrupt or register unemployed, the amount offered is going to be ridiculously small, whereas, if I try to claw back my business,

the amount will be certainly a little better.

 

With many thanks in advance.

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

How was the account with your supplier arranged? Some make you sign a personal guarantee whereby you become liable otherwise the debt lies with your company. The HCEO may attend your home address if he believes there are goods there that belong to your company or if arranged as a personal guarantee can do so anyway. Regardless of what the paperwork says there is nothing that says you have to allow him access to your home, unless invited in he can NOT force entry. He may however force entry to any detached outbuildings. Are there any goods or assets at your business address, providing this is not attached to your residential premises he may force entry to find out.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the company became liable for the entire debt unfortunately, I dont know how they got hold of my home address. So the debt is to the company of which I'm the named director. The office I used to run from has now closed and there are no assets there either, its an empty shell. There are certainly no goods at my home address that used to belong to the company, I suppose my laptop could be deemed as being so but thats honestly it.

Edited by alexkbj
Extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its addressed to the limited company but at my personal address, not the registered company address. There is no mention on any documents of my personal name and surname.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is in the company name and you are not a guarantor the sherriffs men can not enter your property. They have no right of entry to any residential dwellings only business premises and if they say they have then they are lying.

 

It could be that the creditor is trying to claim off an insurance policy and so has had to take the matter to the high court, cant see any other reason for chasing a company that is not trading and as no assets.

 

Lastly, dont worry about this, you should inform the sherrif that there are no goods belonging to the debtor, ie the company at your address. If they still attend then simple do not open the door to them, if you do they can enter and seize goods, it is then on you to prove they dont belong to the debtor, avoid this distraint by not letting them in, remember they can NOT force entry into a private dwelling residence.

 

hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this bigal007 - I'll speak with them tomorrow and state that the debt is in the LTD company name and there are no assets belonging to the company at my residential address. Should I strike off my company ASAP? It hasn't traded for a long while and was kept open only to retain the name. Its registered address is NOT my personal home residence.

 

Could a winding up petition be ordered? Not that I understand what that is but it was mentioned by the creditors solicitors back last year. Is it worth me making an offer of repayment to the sherriff? It would then be considered by the creditor. I could explain that the company is defunct, has no assets and that, I, as its director have no assets either. Finally, would bankruptcy be a sensible option for me or perhaps an IVA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Writ is made to your company and as company director you made no personnal guarantee to the debt, there are no assets etc then the Judgment Creditor can apply to make you bankrupt. Given your circumstances, then that to me sounds good as it saves you the costs to declaring yourself bankrupt.

 

The title of your thread say's 'walking posession arrived today' can I ask if the walking possession came by mail or did the paperwork come delivered by hand? Also who is the acting HCEO company? ...it is always good to know a little about the people your up against.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should you make an offer to pay the creditor if it isnt your debt, its the companies debt and the company is a separate legal entity which means you are not personally liable as long as you are not a guarantor personally, being a director does not make you automatically liable for a LTD companies debts, the opposite is true.

 

If you are in any doubt ring your lawyer in the morning and he will confirm this over the phone im sure :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So does this mean he can force his way into a set of garages, for example? We are a small block of flats here and the garages are in a separate building at the rear with individual unmarked garage doors. If a bailiff comes to any of our addresses at the flats, upon being refused entry could they then force entry into the individual garages?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To put it simple they cant take anything that doesnt belong to the limited company, period, matters not where it is although I wouldnt recommend storing your personal possesions at a business premises as after they have seized them it may be down to you to prove that they do not belong to the company :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

These would need to be proper bailiffs though, or could they just be ordinary DCAs empowered by the writ? Our garages out the back aren't numbered anyway so they'd need to know which was which I'd imagine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they certainly can not force their way into your home or out buildings, they can seize cars that are on your drive or parked on the road, but essentially bailiffs of whatever kind certainly can not force entry into a private dwelling residence. Open doors and windows are an invitation to them so beware.

Of yopu or anyone else is worried by this then I to put your mind at rest speak to a lawyer, most will tell you this over the phone free of charge, the CAB will give you the same advice.

If these people turn up the best way to deal with them is not to open the door or engage them in any dialogue, they will soon get bored and go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they certainly can not force their way into your home or out buildings, they can seize cars that are on your drive or parked on the road, but essentially bailiffs of whatever kind certainly can not force entry into a private dwelling residence. Open doors and windows are an invitation to them so beware.

Of yopu or anyone else is worried by this then I to put your mind at rest speak to a lawyer, most will tell you this over the phone free of charge, the CAB will give you the same advice.

If these people turn up the best way to deal with them is not to open the door or engage them in any dialogue, they will soon get bored and go away.

 

I would suggest than rather than give incorrect advice you research the matter carefully....you will sadly find they can break in to outbuidings and garages as long as they are detached from the main dwelling, remember you are dealing with High Court Enforcement using a writ of Fi Fa' not a snotty little debt collector or a know it all Baiiff. the poster would be wise to question your knowledge to High Court Enforcement before they find themselves even deeper in the mire!!!

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...