Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nephew Just Become Self Employed - HMRS Sent Letter Requesting £100 Penalty


Daniel182
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4451 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

My nephew became self employed plasterer December 2011, up until now he as not done any plastering work.

 

Apparently when he filed to become self employed, he was told he did not have to send in anything because it was nearly the end of the tax year and had to wait til 2013.

 

HMRS sent him two letters requesting £100 Penalty + a £1600 fine (Links Below)

 

http://www.iimmgg.com/image/5803c2c476bf414b2c16128091dc698f

 

http://www.iimmgg.com/image/54671e5099b40cccf14cad4178e9a0a2

 

I would be very grateful for any advice i could past on.

 

Thanks for your time and help

 

Daniel

Link to post
Share on other sites

He really needs to contact his tax office and tell them what exactly are his circumstances.

Tell him to mention what he was told when he registered.

They can't fine him for no TR for 10-11 if he wasn't self employed during that period. It looks like a mistake on their behalf to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He registered self employed in dec 2011, then what he was told is right. Can't find the link at the moment explaining the routine. I do remember seeing something mentioned about maybe having to give them details around summer time if you become self employed at the end of the year. But yes, it looks like an error on their part for this. He will still need to file his tax returns in future even if he doesn't earn anything though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry you are dead right.

I've only been a sole trader for 12 years so still getting used to it. :oops:

 

31 January: online returns

Your online tax return must reach HMRC by midnight on 31 January.

You only have longer than this if you received the letter, telling you to send a tax return, after 31 October. In this case you'll have three months from the date you received that letter.

There's an earlier deadline of 30 December if you want HMRC to collect any tax you owe through your tax code. You now can ask for this if you owe less than £3,000. Please show this clearly on your tax return. HMRC will try to collect the tax due through your code, but they can't always do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it October if calculating your own tax and Jan if they doing it for you?

 

 

Yeh other way round lol 12 years??? Hats off to you. Am new to it, find the thought a bit daunting. But determined to get it right. Just hope I have got my spread sheets right. Reading Daniels thread here has me coming out in a cold sweat! HMRC's errors are the last thing you need when first starting out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As your nephew became self employed in Dec 2011 then potentially he could have received income from Dec 2011 until the end off the tax year on 5 April 2012

I couldn't see the images you posted (writing too small and my eyesight is too poor) so are HMRC applying a penalty for failure to submit a return and if so, which tax year are they referring to?

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

As your nephew became self employed in Dec 2011 then potentially he could have received income from Dec 2011 until the end off the tax year on 5 April 2012

I couldn't see the images you posted (writing too small and my eyesight is too poor) so are HMRC applying a penalty for failure to submit a return and if so, which tax year are they referring to?

 

But you don't file a tax return after first registering in december until the following tax year. The first image was a letter sent to the OP's nephew stating they were too late filing their tax return for 2010-2011. Which was basically before they registered as self employed.

' you now have 100 pound penalty because you did not file your 2010-2011 tax return on time'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's what i was trying to establish if it was a late filing penalty or a failure to notify penalty.

I think that someone on the SA(self assessment) team has input the wrong start date!

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worthwhile considering whether or not there are two unrelated issues here. Although your nephew became self-employed in Dec 2011, this does not preclude the possibility that a Return was issued for the year ended 5 April 2011. There are many reasons that someone may be issued a self-assessment Return, and self-employment is just one of them. He needs to establish quickly whether or not a 2011 Return was issued, and if so, when. The date of issue is important. Even if the Return is issued in error following a clerical mistake by HMRC, it is generally the case that once issued it must be returned. However, if the Return was issued out of cycle (i.e. not on 6 April) then it may be the case that the normal deadlines don't apply.

 

He should act quickly. The new penalty regime means that the grounds for appeal have been significantly eroded since April 2011.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...