Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
    • Are Resident car parks subject to Planning permission under Town and Country Planning {control of Advertisements ] Regulations? SCHEDULE 1CLASSES OF ADVERTISEMENT TO WHICH PARTS 2 AND 3 DO NOT APPLY Class A "1.  The advertisement is not readily visible from outside the enclosed land or from any place to which the public have a right of access." As a private residential site does the public have a right of access? This particular Act has so many caveats that even many Councils do not understand it and that includes me. Though I do understand it better than many council planning departments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Paragon PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4433 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi just looking for some advice on whether it is worth my time making a claim I have included my agreement for you to have a look at I was sold it over the phone but unsure how.also the tick box was already marked with an x when I revived the agreement .any input is more than welcome .

Link to post
Share on other sites

paragon are coughing quite nicely

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , yes I have requested and received back my agreement and statements the policy is for single disability and redundancy cover though the loan was joint,the secured loan agreement was signed 29th December 2005

Amount of credit for

Cash loan £10,000

Duration 60 months

Monthly payment £210

Number of payments 60

Apr(variable) 9.9 %

Total charge for credit £2,606

Interest rate per annum 9.516%

 

amount for credit for

Payment protection loan £1,500

Duration 60 months

Monthly payment £31.51

Number of payments 60

Apr(variable) 9.9%

 

Protection premium £1,500

Total charge £390.60

Interest rate per annum 9.516%

Total price for cover £1,890.60

 

Total borrowed £11,500

Total monthly payment £241.61

 

How much would I expect back?

Edited by leighb4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , yes I have requested and received back my agreement and statements the policy is for single disability and redundancy cover though the loan was joint,the secured loan agreement was signed 29th December 2005

Amount of credit for

Cash loan £10,000

Duration 60 months

Monthly payment £210

Number of payments 60

Apr(variable) 9.9 %

Total charge for credit £2,606

Interest rate per annum 9.516%

 

amount for credit for

Payment protection loan £1,500

Duration 60 months

Monthly payment £31.51

Number of payments 60

Apr(variable) 9.9%

 

Protection premium £1,500

Total charge £390.60

Interest rate per annum 9.516%

Total price for cover £1,890.60

 

Total borrowed £11,500

Total monthly payment £241.61

 

How much would I expect back?

 

Hi

 

You can use this spreadsheet to calculate your claim amount.

 

Enter each payment you have made giving the date, description and amount and the sheet will do the rest.

 

Go to the fos website and download a consumer questionnaire and complete it.

 

Send the questionnaire and a copy of the spreadsheet together with a brief letter requiring refund to the lender

 

They will have 8 weeks to investigate and give you a final decision

 

ims

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You can use this spreadsheet to calculate your claim amount.

 

Enter each payment you have made giving the date, description and amount and the sheet will do the rest.

 

Go to the fos website and download a consumer questionnaire and complete it.

 

Send the questionnaire and a copy of the spreadsheet together with a brief letter requiring refund to the lender

 

They will have 8 weeks to investigate and give you a final decision

 

ims

 

[ATTACH]34154[/ATTACH]

 

Do i enter full monthly loan amount or just the insurance amount ?sorry little confused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are claiming back what you paid on PPI

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

After completing and sending off the fos questionnaire and calculating spreadsheet to Paragon

 

i have today received a reply basically saying my application was submitted to Paragon by Central Capital

and they are responsible for the sale of the loan and the insurance.

letter as follows.

 

Thank you for your payment questionnaire

We are concerned to hear that you feel you have been missold ppi.

your application was submitted to paragon by your broker, Central Capital Limited.

 

They acted on your behalf in processing your application and were responsible for the sale of your loan and insurance,

ensuring you received copies of the terms and conditions of your loan and insurance and the answering any questions that may have arisen.

 

your broker handled all the paperwork relating to your application and only forwarded to Paragon the fully packaged documents after you had signed your credit agreement.

 

As paragon was not party to the conversations you had with your broker regarding any sale of the insurance,we are unable to comment further in this respect.

 

We would therefore ,recommend that you contact your broker directly with your concerns regarding the sale of the insurance.

 

For ease of rerernace we can confirm the last known address for your broker to be (address)

 

We trust this explains Paragons position to you and we hope you receive a satisfactory response from your broker.

 

under the terms of our complaints procedure i am obliged to advise you that you may consider this to be paragons final response.

 

if you are dissatisfied with this i have enclosed a formal complaints procedure which provides details of our trade body to whom you wish to refer this matter

 

What is the next step ? do i persue Paragon or Central Capital ? thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

WRONG!!

 

sec 56 of the CCA rules applies:

 

56.

— (1) In this Act “antecedent negotiations ” means any negotiations with the debtor or hirer—

(a) conducted by the creditor or owner in relation to the making of any regulated agreement, or

(b) conducted by a credit-broker in relation to goods sold or proposed to be sold by the credit-broker to the creditor before forming the subject-matter of a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement within section 12(a), or

© conducted by the supplier in relation to a transaction financed or proposed to be financed by a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement and “negotiator ” means the person by whom negotiations are so conducted with the debtor or hirer.

 

 

and as paragon have just coughed on two ppi reclaims here

 

i'd write back!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just use what i have put

 

sure and simple

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...