Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest and Cap1 card debt - Statute Barred Debt?


franila
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4441 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning

,I apologise if an answer to this question can be found elsewhere, if that is the case please point me in the right direction!

 

I have received a letter (dated 7th March) from Capquest advising me:

 

'they have purchased my account from Capital One Bank (Europe) Plc and it is their responsibility to manage your account to an affordable payment plan.

The Offer Full and final payment of £600.78 to settle the account in one lump sum or over a time that is acceptable to all concerned.

This offer is only available until 21st March 2012. Failure to contact us by 21st March will mean this offer will end.

 

The full amount of £1200 will remain legally owed by you.

Let's work on this together; we look forward to hearing rom you.

Collections Department.''

 

This is from a credit card that I last used and made a payment for in approximately 2003 at the very latest.

I have had NO correspondence whatsoever since then.

I have worked hard over the last 9 years to improve my credit rating and it is now in a very good state ( I have been able to get credit and my file shows no defaults) and I am looking hopefully to get a mortage in the next 12 months.

 

Having dug around a little am I right in assuming that this debt is statue barred as it is over 6 years since I have been contacted/acknowledged the debt?

I am in a better position financially now, so should I just pay the settlement amount and will that be the end of it?

or should I go down the statute barred route and give Capquest nothing?

 

(after hearing what a horrible company they are).

 

Thank you very much for any advice anyone can give.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed they were very careful with the wording of their letter. They do say the debt is legally owed which is correct, but what they've neglected to mention is that it is unenforceable.

 

They cannot register a default, it would have already have been registered by Cap1 over six years ago & would have dropped off your credit file & cannot be re-registered & certainly not by Capquest in any case. They cannot apply for a CCJ, bankruptcy or anything else.

 

What they can do is politely request that you make payment. Equally, you can politely tell them to go forth & multiply. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

haaaaa Wassock,,, think I will use that long lost term in my correspondence,,, Yes they can ask you to pay politely but as stated you can tell them to Go forth and Multiply, but if Franila you are in a good mood please drop me your address and I will bill you for some dodgy amount,,,,, shall we say £4,000 to the Hippy Debt collection fund... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am being pedantic, get me drift Fran,,,,,, Beg away SB is SB or Unenforceable is Unenforceable, with me they keep telling me on my UE accounts,, Hippy it will help to repair your credit rating if you pay us..!!!!!!!! ( what, !!!! I am in more debt than Greece you fools )

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had them phantom up a £50 payment when I sent SB letter but a couple more letters (and I wish I used wazzer on it) they accepted they made a 'mistake' so dont be put off if they phantom a payment just come back here

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that was a cassock. ;)

 

Ohhhh Hello sailor a mattelo with a priest in his hammock:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, have heard nothing yet...although I have just come home to a Royal Mail 'tried to deliver' leaflet for a letter that needs a signature. Could this be from them or am I being ultra-paranoid?!:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess so-I'll go and sign for the letter this week and see what it holds! I can see how people go crazy mulling all this stuff over. Constantly on tenterhooks....gits:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

It's been a month since I sent the statute barred letter to Capquest and I have heard nothing in return. However, I came home this evening to a letter addressed to me from 1st Credit stating:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

1st Credit Limited is attempting to contact the above named regarding a personal matter.

Your address has been supplied as a possible address for our subject.

 

If you are MISS ****

Please contact our offices immediately on 01737 237370 and quote the above 1st Credit eference number at which time further information can be provided.

If you are not MISS ****

iF MISS **** is no longer resident at this address we would appreciate you calling us at your earliest convenience on 01737 237376. This will enable us to update our records and thereby avoid our contacting you unnecessarily in the future.

 

Any information provided to us will be treated in the strictest confidence.

 

If no response is received to this letter within ten days we will continue to hold this address as the current address of MISS **** and may issue further letters.

 

Yours faithfully

Gavin Flynn

Head of Collections

 

Could this letter be linked to Capquest not responding to the SB letter? Do I just ignore this? Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thank you,

Franila.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guesses (only 2)

 

1. Capquest have dropped the account as it's SB, and conned 1st Credit in to buying but it's a bit quick for that.

2. This is another matter altogether.

 

Don't speak to them, wait until the put something in writting.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Capquest and Cap1 card debt - Statute Barred Debt?
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...