Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • I agree
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital One PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

My hubby got a capital one credit card in dec 2002 through a postal invitation. We still have the account open and we are repaying under the CCCS on a DMP (about £125 left).

 

We began a claim against mis-sold PPI in august 2011 and received our final response last week as they lost all the paperwork.

 

Initially we requested the terms and conditions, then SAR which is incomplete as it only list data from January 2005 onwards making it impossible for me to calculate the full amount of PPI we paid.

 

We cancelled the PPI when we realised it was an optional charge in December 2008 (when we became aware of all the publicity about it) but didn't realised we could still claim it back as we assumed the account was too old.

 

So our final response letter is pretty bog standard refusing our claim under the basis that we took out PPI in the activation phone call made in December 2002 but they cannot provide a copy of this call claiming it has been destroyed. They cannot provide any written evidence that we accepted PPI so that's that.

 

They also claim as we didn't question the payments on the statement we knew what it was for. We did question the payments numerous items and was always told it was something you had to have to get the card. As we didn't have the best credit rating we accepted this as true.

 

Their decision doesn't really cut it with us but rather than waiting for the FOS or start court proceedings we have been able to get a re-review of the case and my hubby has a phone call arrange on monday am to discuss. Obviously we know nothing is going to change and we're happy to go through the courts if needed.

 

I just have a few questions if possible:

 

Does it matter that we cancelled the policy in December 2008? Neither side has mentioned it and as I'm currently writing a very lengthy letter in response I don't know whether to include this or not. Was thinking along the lines of " As soon as we became aware the policy was optional we cancelled immediately".

 

Should they be able to provide evidence of all payments of PPI made since the account started? Otherwise how do we know how much has been charged?

 

Finally if I was able to post our letter to capital one here would anyone be willing to give it a read through and offer opinions?

 

Many thanks and apologises for the long post.

 

Joanne

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Cap One are a tough nut to crack and this phone call activation nonsense is their standard response.

 

If you take the court route to get your money back you need to bear in mind that the onus of proof of mis-selling will be on you.

 

It may be that they do have the transcripts of these calls but just claim that they do not have to release information prior to six years. It depends how hard you want to push for full comliance with a SAR. You can ask them to confirm in writing the date on which your data was destroyed, by whom and why.

 

If you post your proposed letter up then it can be reviewed.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is as far as I have got. We are also making a complaint about the service we have received which will be added to the end of the letter but I didn't feel it was really relevant to this thread.

 

Any comments greatly appreciated ....

 

 

"I am writing with reference to the above account and my claim for mis-sold PPI which has been with your company since August 2011 and I finally received a final response to in letter dated 5th March 2012.

 

I am demanding a re-review of my case by you personally on the following basis:

 

In your letter dated 5th March 2012 you claim I purchased PPI during my card activation phone call dated 16th December 2002. You are unable to provide evidence of this call claiming it has been destroyed. If you cannot provide evidence of this call then you are unable to assert with any credibility that this call took place.

 

You claim you are also unable to provide evidence of this destruction of my personal data. Under the Civil Evidence Act 1995 you are required to provide evidence that this data was destroyed by a registered data controller and in accordance with the act. You are also required to keep auditable records on documentation held including a certificate of destruction. I look forward to receiving this evidence and information by return.

 

I also expect to receive relevant copies of Sales Scripts, Training Manuals including Objection Handling guidelines which you would be required to provide to the FOS if I chose to proceed to this option.

 

You have sent me incomplete statements of my account between 6th January 2003 and 6th January 2005. There is no evidence of any transaction history between that period yet from 5th February 2005 there is full transaction history. This leaves you in breach of the Data Protection Act and I will be lodging my complaint with the Information Comissioner’s Office. It also leaves me unable to create accurate calculations of the amount of PPI charged to my account.

 

As members of the FSA, Banking and Lending Code, ABI and GISC you are required to abide by the regulations and codes set out by these organisation. They include:

 

“ making sure all the information we give you is clear, fair and not misleading;”

 

“give you enough information and help so you can make an informed decision before you make a final commitment to buy your insurance policy.”

 

The Association of British Insurers codes also set out relevant requirements. For example, the ABI General Insurance Business Code of Practice for all Intermediaries (1989) (the ABI Code) said that it:

 

“... shall be an overriding obligation of an intermediary at all times to conduct business with utmost good faith and integrity.”

 

The ABI Code also included requirements about "explanation of the contract". And it said the intermediary should:

 

“Explain all the essential provisions of the cover afforded by the policy or policies he is recommending so as to ensure as far as is possible that the prospective policyholder understands what he is buying; [and] draw attention to any restrictions and exclusions applying to the policy.”

 

As I have already stated in numerous conversations with your company I was told that PPI was something that came with the card and I did not receive or return any documentation relating to this. I also queried the charge when noticed on my statement and was again informed it was nothing to worry about just something I had to have to have the card. At no point was I informed that PPI was optional, what the full costs and implications were and you are unable to provide any evidence contrary to this.

 

As a Insurance intermediary you were required to provide me with adequate information to make an informed decision. You did not.

 

The Unfair terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 states:

 

Unfair Terms, Section 5.4

 

“It shall be for any seller or supplier who claims that a term was individually negotiated to show that it was”

 

Written Contracts, Section 7.1

 

“A seller or supplier shall ensure that any written term of a contract is expressed is plain, intelligible language”

 

Written Contracts, Section 7.2

 

“If there is doubt about the meaning of a written term, the interpretation which is most favourable to the consumer shall prevail”

 

Effect of unfair term, Section 8.1

 

“An unfair term in a contract concluded with a consumer by a seller or supplier shall not be binding of the consumer”

 

The responsibility lies with you, the seller or supplier, to ensure the relevant regulations and codes are adhered to and as the consumer the law is firmly on my side.

 

With all this in mind I would suggest that a more favourable decision would be in the best interests of both parties and offer you the opportunity to re-evaluate your previous decision.

 

I have enclosed a without prejudice draft Statement of Charges calculated with a rate of 32.56% interest which is the standard purchase rate of interest as stated in the terms and conditions sent to me. As you can see the period of 6th January 2003 – 6th January 2005 is currently highlighted. This is due to the lack of information provided by your company leaving me to estimate the amount. As soon as you provide the necessary information these amounts will be adjusted as necessary.

 

If the appropriate outcome is not reached or any of the requested information not received within 14 calendar days of receipt of this letter I will begin county court action."

 

Feel free to rip apart if necessary, thanks.

 

Joanne

Link to post
Share on other sites

very good and now puts the ball in their court.

Get the court papers filled out though as I am sure they will send you a letter stating they have investigated this matter and do not agree etc. I am aware you have read my mammoth thread so you will be aware of the time scales for court action, still faster than FOS but you will need to put in the hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I used your compound interest spreadsheet which worked out from 01/2003 to 01/2009 £602.03 charges and £931.67 interest at 32.56% interest.

 

Only problem I had was for the first two years they haven't sent me the full statements so I had to guess the charges based on balances that matched from the rest of the statements they sent.

 

We sent the letter and spreadsheet via email to Liam Quegan yesterday and my Husband spoke to him yesterday and he is personally going to look back at it. Expecting the same answer though.

 

I'm happy to post the spreadsheet if you wanted if someone could tell me how.

 

I will keep you up dated :)

 

Joanne

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Just a quick update ....

 

We sent the e-mail last Sunday evening for Liam to receive Monday morning (12th) and my husband spoke to him that Monday lunchtime and he has confirmed receipt and that he is investigating.

 

Had an e-mail last Tuesday (13th) from Simon Carter (Executive Response Team) on behalf of Liam Quegan saying he will be investigating and respond within 5 working days or e-mail explaining why he is unable to respond. Had an e-mail yesterday requesting a further five working days. Not sure if this is good or bad?? We'll have to see.

 

Obviously if we don't get the response we want, as we stated in writing we expected Liam to investigate personally we will be requesting this.

 

In the meantime, our complaint about customer service has been answered and we have it confirmed, in writing, that my husband was lied to and abused by the customer service staff :).

 

As soon as we hear anything else I will let you all know.

 

napoleon-dynamite - thank you, if you need any numbers or e-mail addresses we have quite a few so happy to pass them on lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

With all due respect it sounds to me like they are playing you and just stringing you along and buying time!

Stop being so soft on them, give them a written time limit now and stick to it.

Start your action exactly once this time limit is up and start taking control.

I wouldn't waste any more time on the phone to these pond life you will have plenty of phone time later with the solicitors!

They have YOUR money and they will try and keep hold of it as long as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have responded to the second e-mail stating they have til end of play next Tuesday and then we start court proceedings. Am looking at this stage as gaining evidence against them. The old give them enough rope and they'll hang themselves. Have a child free day tomorrow so will be beginning the court forms.

 

Finally received the SAR requested in October today as well and the PPI requirements box says NO .... couldn't be clearer really.

 

Gregorious77, was actually just scanning through your thread to see if you've listed the name of the solicitors they use ... like to do my research .... if you didn't mind letting me know thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just called Litigation department.

Started off with Wendy Starr who I believe is a proper solicitor but not 100% sure then had Indi Kaur whos title is Legal specialist, I dont think she is a solicitor but when I had the allocation hearing by telephone they also had a brief on their side who did all the legal talking (indi was just listening in) I dont know what company it was although I might have his name written down somewhere in my notes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks,

 

Have received our response with the usual blurb they talk. There is one sentence that confuses me though:

 

"Our records show that the policy was indeed sold over the telpehone when you contacted us to activate your credit card on 16 December 2002. Although we do not have a copy of that specific telephone conversation, a note was placed on your account to confirm the sale"

 

I assumed this information would be in the SAR but that only goes back to 2008, so four years missing. If they could prove this note wouldn't they send me a copy. He must have seen it to state that.

 

Also they have cleared our balance and offered us £100 ex-gratia payment for the service we have received from them. Should I take this?

 

Am concerned if I do this will be used against us at court but could use the money to start the proceedings really. Should I get confirmation that this £100 is compensation for the customer service we received?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does the SAR only go back to 2008?

You need to tell them to send the rest or you will report them!

When is the 40 days up?

Ask for a recording or transcript of the alleged call as well!

They said the same to me but it was not detailed in the SAR at all although my SAR did go back to the beginning of the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We requested the SAR back in October so 40 days definitely up as they lost the request. They don't really care that I'm going to report them though. Apparently they are investigating why I have not been sent a full SAR. In the SAR though is the computer screens of the original application so they must still have my full account history to have included this.

 

They have already confirmed they don't have a copy of the phone call just apparently a note on the account. Like I said they must have seen the note on the account to put this in writing so why not send me the proof.

 

They have stated in their final response they plan to defend the sale of PPI so I need to move on to the next stage.

 

Not sure whether to go FOS or small claims court at the moment.

 

Am fed up of the cat and mouse games they are playing. Its so frustating

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK,

 

So will be going to court but will need help with this if that's ok.

 

Take it its the N1 form I need to fill first?

 

Also do I need to inform Capital One of my intention to take them to court first?

 

They have sent me the statements for the missing 2 years transactions they previously so I can now calculate the correct figures to claim back. Do I put the end claim date as now or the date I cancelled the PPI? And do I add the additional 8% interest on top and how do I calculate that.

 

Thanks

 

Additional Info: Just done a new calculation based on the end of claim date being today (as read in greg's thread) and it makes this:

 

PPI charges (01/03 - 12/08) £558.17

Compound Interest @ 32.56 % (standard purchase rate) £2867.27

 

Total amount £3425.44

 

Plus 8% stat interest of £1841.07

 

Overall total of £5266.51.

 

Can anyone verify these figures? Will I still be able to go through the small claims court?

 

Thanks

Edited by joanneg
Link to post
Share on other sites

only you can decide court or FOS.

Court will cost money which you will add onto the claim. It will be quicker 9 months in my case and you have control of timescales to a certain extent.

You will have to do some work but all on here can help with that bit.

FOS will do it all for you but who knows how long itll take?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK,

 

So will be going to court but will need help with this if that's ok. Good and help is at hand!

 

Take it its the N1 form I need to fill first? Yes fill that out

 

Also do I need to inform Capital One of my intention to take them to court first? No they have given you their final response

 

They have sent me the statements for the missing 2 years transactions they previously so I can now calculate the correct figures to claim back. Do I put the end claim date as now or the date I cancelled the PPI? And do I add the additional 8% interest on top and how do I calculate that.

 

Thanks

 

Additional Info: Just done a new calculation based on the end of claim date being today (as read in greg's thread) and it makes this:

 

PPI charges (01/03 - 12/08) £558.17

Compound Interest @ 32.56 % (standard purchase rate) £2867.27

 

Total amount £3425.44

 

Plus 8% stat interest of £1841.07 Dont add this, its at the courts discretion. state that you will be requesting it in your POC though.

 

Overall total of £5266.51.

 

Can anyone verify these figures? Will I still be able to go through the small claims court? Once you remove the 8% stat you will!!

 

Thanks

 

See above to answers to your questions and go get em.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers! And I will!

 

Do I still need to push them for my complete SAR. I'm a little worried that as they claim they have a note on the account that we took the PPI by phone (but they haven't included it in the SAR ... it only goes back to 10/08) they could bring that out as evidence against us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...