Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for updating us. Your decision is very understandable. Don't worry. You have done very well standing your ground against these people in a way you have and you have got everything you wanted bar just a very few quid. Congratulations
    • Whatever the nuances of the law, they will be lost on OPS, who like the rest of the PPcs never bother to get planning permission, ever. When they get a new contract they don't want to delay issuing PCNs by deigning to follow the law, especially as the period when they take over and the parking restrictions are new is the time when they can catch most drivers out.
    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Back copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Home Learning College + APEX again


fractal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4447 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, all - I am very grateful this forum exists!

Apologies in advance if I am posting the thread to the wrong forum - I am not sure whether it belongs to Students or Debt Collection sub-forums.

 

To sum up my story, which is similar to many ones already here: I signed up for the CIW combined course; was not happy with it but kept up with the payments for a year as I was refused cancelling, and decided I might just as well use the exam vouchers when I get to the stage to be ready to pass the exams but after moving abroad have discovered that the local examination facility does not acknowledge any vouchers purchased in a foreign country.

 

I asked for a refund again, pointing out this reason, as well as the fact that I have not found their course useful, have not used their VLC, have not submitted any assignments and have never bothered the tutor for any support. Another reason I gave was the fact that due to my unexpected return to my home country (family reasons) I would find it hard to keep up with payments, especially for something I might not be able to use anyway. Communication has been by phone, and the paper trail is limited: I got (by email) some form for assessing my income and expenditure???!!! Even though I made it perfectly clear that I want to cancel further payment, as well as an estimate of costs so far incurred by me, and what is the refund I can claim. I suppose (maybe wrongly?) that this case fits within this framework:

"If you no longer want the item" at the direct gov website (sorry, new poster and can't post links).

 

The worst case scenario I assumed was that I won't get anything refunded but any paymen requests would stop - especially since they stopped my access to the VLC (fine by me).

 

However, they seem to have passed on my request to Apex. Now these bullies deserve a separate forum... Apex kept phoning even though I asked them to send me information about what they wanted by email as I am not in the country. They kept phoning the landline number at my last UK address, even though I had warned HLC NOT to use it, as it is not my landline, and what is more, the telephone is answered by an elderly lady who gets confused and/or panics, or by her carers who get upset, naturally. After I phoned Apex and told them I will file a harrassment complaint, they have finally contacted me by email, still not providing any information about what case they have.

 

I refuse to acknowledge any debt, and would definitely take the matter further, especially if my credit report shows damage.

 

What should be the best course of action - please help. This is a very short attempt at describing the situation. My hunch is filing a complaint for phone harrassment, and sending a CCA request for starters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S. I don't even have the vouchers in my hands - haven't claimed them; the only thing that has been used (no markings; just opened a couple of times) have been the books which are the same as the ones sold at CIWCertified website, and I have those materials.

 

I couldn't cancel within their limit because the books were delivered only 2 weeks later! Luckily, I have proof of that (correspondence and scan of the DHL packaging). Actually, they were misdelivered - they had "forgotten" to put the books in, and had sent only a prospectus 2 weeks later, so I have retained copy of the correspondence, including said scan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Home Learning College

Hi Fractal

We are sorry to hear about your issues with your Home Learning College course. We take all complaints very seriously and would like to get in contact with you to see if we can help with you resolve your case.

 

Please contact our customer support team on +4420 8676 6025 or via email.

Kind Regards

Home Learning College

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your message. I would prefer to keep everything in writing, really. Which email address is it best to contact regarding cancellation and/or complaints?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Home Learning College

Hi Fractal

 

customer.support @homelearningcollege.com is the address to send your query to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I have just received a response from APEX that they are the institution currently dealing with the case. Does it mean that I should send all the information via them, or contact you directly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Home Learning College

Hi Fractal

 

Could you send the information to both Home Learning College and APEX please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...