Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CREDIT UNION-rep threats to young girl - they've phoned ex-fam/friends [ex-dir too] chasing £60 debt - disgusing!!


amberz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4493 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My friends daughter borrowed £90 from her local credit union.

When total owed was down to £60 she missed two payments.

 

A gentleman from credit union called her mobile phone to discuss this with her,

he told her he could come to her mums house to speak to her.

 

When she declined saying she wasnt at her mums, he became quite aggresive with her and asked where she was because he was coming to get her.

She hung the phone up and was visibly shaken by his tone.

She very stupidly didnt tell her mum, now explaining he hadnt called her again anyway.

Surely they cannot scare young girls like this, surely this isnt one tactic taught while training to work with the credit union?.

 

A week later though, a member of the credit union called all her relations i.e. aunts, uncles, grandmother, even her estranged father,

asking did this girls mum live at a certain address, did this girl stay with her mum.

I really dont think this can be the proper way to deal with things as this girls mum has been estranged from her ex for many years

and they have never attempted to call the mum to ask her these thing's.

One of the aunts an uncle do not even have the same surname,

their telephone number is ex-directory therfore we cannot begin to think how they would call their home at 9.20 on a Saturday night lol.

They would not say who they were when asked until finaly her father had another call today and asked had it been them making the phonecalls to the whole family

and they said yes they had but could not explain to him why they thought they had the right to do this.

 

Now the whole family this girl has had nothing to do with for years know all about this, which is pretty embarrassing for a 21yr old girl.

Is this common practise?

 

Or is there anything she can do about this and also is there anything she can do about this threatning phonecall from the gentleman?

 

Thanks in advance Amberz

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is disgusting!!!

 

i didn't think the credit union operated this way

 

threat title changed to alert attention

 

pers i'd contact the OFT/TS/ICO tomorrow as a matter of urgency and COMPLAIN.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I would also make an Formal Complaint in writing to the Head of the Credit Union (send recorded delivery always keep a paper trail)

 

I must admit i never thought the Credit Union would stoop so low shocking.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

She's not a 'girl'. She's a 21 year old woman. Which makes the Credit Union's behaviour in speaking to her family about personal business matters even more shocking. It sounds like they've treated her like a silly child who can't deal with her own financial matters, instead of an adult. Definitely complain, as soon as you can, to the OFT and to ABCUL http://www.abcul.org/home

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...