Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Income Support Overpayment


KKorky
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4501 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I've just received a letter from DWP saying that they have over paid me Income Support from 2008 to the present date, totalling £740.

 

They say the money has to be returned.

 

There reason ...."the overpayment occurred because on the 18/08/2011 your circumstances changed and the office that paid your benefit was not told at the correct time about changes to money being paid to you or a dependant"

 

Period of over payment; 14/08/2008--11/10/2011.

 

Surely this is there fault & not mine..?

 

If you google "The Child Poverty Action Group" you'll see that they have won a case in court concerning this DWP Over payments.

 

Has any members went through this before ?

 

The point I'm getting at after reading the links is, it's not my fault that the info wasn't passed on through there departments, & the bucks been passed onto me through there incompetence.

 

Any help appreciated,

 

Thanks,

 

K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your replies.

 

Are you saying that you notified them of a change of circumstances and they didn't action it please?

 

No, this letter has landed out the blue, there reason on the letter;

 

because on the 18/08/2011 your circumstances changed and the office that paid your benefit was not told at the correct time about changes to money being paid to you or a dependant

 

So it looks like whatever changed has been back dated to 14/08/2008.

 

it might help if you explain which of your circumstances changed? ie what money changed?

 

TBH I haven't a clue, I'll have to phone first thing Monday Morning.

 

Did anyone google "The Child Poverty Action Group", & if so what's your opinion..?

 

Thanks,

 

K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are referring to: -

 

http://www.cpag.org.uk/welfarerights/overpayment-recovery/

 

this related to a failed attempt by the dwp to recover non-recoverable overpayments in 2006/2007

 

this does not apply to your case where the decision is that the overpayment is recoverable rather than non-recoverable

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am however confused how a change in august 2011 would cause overpayment from august 2008, are those definitely the dates in your letter?

 

I'm the same, & won't find out till Monday Mornings phone call, & Yes those are the correct dates.

 

this does not apply to your case where the decision is that the overpayment is recoverable rather than non-recoverable

 

This is a quote from one of the pages I've been reading;

 

Judges in the Court of Appeal ruled the government had no power to recoup the overpayments unless they were the result of misrepresentation or fraud

 

I didn't make a fraudulent claim, gave them all the right info, the mistake is on there behalf, not mine.

 

Cheers,

 

K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to obtain more information from DWP in relation to the overpayment in relation to how the overpayment has been caused.

 

It has always been the position that: -

a) Income Support overpayments are recoverable if they are caused by failure to declare, misrepresentation or fraud

b) Income Support overpayments are non-recoverable if they are not caused by failure to declare, misrepresentation or fraud

 

The case you are referring to relates to an attempt of DWP to recover type b) overpayments outside the Social Security regime.

 

From the limited information you have supplied, it appears that DWP have determined that you had a type a) overpayment, in which situation the case you are referring to does not apply.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the limited information you have supplied, it appears that DWP have determined that you had a type a) overpayment, in which situation the case you are referring to does not apply.

 

That's my point, I don't come under the Type A, if there is a mistake it is on there behalf, not mine. Some where along the line DWP have made an error.

 

I haven't failed to declare, given any misrepresentation, or tried any fraud.

 

So I'm thinking I come under Type A.

 

Sorry I cannot give any more info, all I've got is what's on the letter, the phone call Monday should enlighten me.

 

Thanks for your reply,

 

K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...