Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Some advice please on brighthouse practice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:|HI all

 

firstly i apologise if my question has been answerd on a previous thread, i have looked but did not find it.

 

i currently have a tv through brighthouse which next month i will be 2 years into the agreement so clearly paid mpore than a third off.

ill be ahonest here im not the best payer in the world and frequently miss payments but by no more than 2 weeks.

my payments are usually a week late if anything but i always pay.

 

these last few months whenever my payment is late we are getting harrasing phonecalls on a daily basis to make payment.

at present i am 2 weeks in arrears which is a grand total of just under £20 (huge money)

today i have had a visit while i was out by 2 of the staff from my local store (both their names were written on the card.

the card was telling me they they called to discuss my account and remove goods to which i have to be honest about at first it did make me chuckle all for £20.

my wife fished out our agreement from when we took the finance out on 29th march 2010.

i was reading the bit about

REPOSSESION : YOUR RIGHTS.

"if you do not keep your side of the agreement but you have paid at least one third of the total ammount payable under this agreement that is xxxxxxx we may not take back the goods against your wishes unless we get a court order. if we do take th egoods without your consent or a court order you have the right to get back any money that you have paid under this agreement.

 

so my question is this, if they come to the house and im at work and my wife lets them in but refuses to sign the form and they remove the goods without ME giving consent.

would this mean that i can get my money back that i have paid so far,

 

i know this may sound strange to some but i am sick and tired of seeing these companies bully and harass people.

me and my wife have discussed this and we no longer wish to have any dealings with brighthouse.

so what could be classed as me giving consent to take the goods?

would it have to be my signature or would my wife letting them into the house be classed as consent.

i have advised my wife they if they come to the door and im at work just to let them in and try and talk about it reoasnably but not to try and stop them or cause a fuss if they want to remove goods but to stipulate that she is not giving them permission to do so.

this way i would be able to get my money back from them.

 

really sorry for the long speech but just want to make sure i know where i stand against these bullies.

 

just us a quick note, when i phone them to make my payment up from the previous week they always say that they cannot take it unless i pay that weeks payment at the same time althogh it is not due untill the saturday.

apparently the system does not allow this...:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your wife doesnt even have to let them in - unless they have a court order and you would know about that as a claim would have needed to be issued in the first instance.

 

You should be making a complaint to the OFT about this harrassment.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for such a quick response.

what i ultimatly wanted to do (yes this may be the wrong way to go about things ) but is to get my money back from them as i realy do not want this company inmy life any more.

i was hoping if we just played ball with them and let them carry out there nasty deed of removing the goods without my consent would this be the the bast way of getting my money back.

 

Your wife doesnt even have to let them in - unless they have a court order and you would know about that as a claim would have needed to be issued in the first instance.

 

You should be making a complaint to the OFT about this harrassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep that card safe as well. That is evidence.

Isn't it strange how when we hear of this, BH say it is a one off thing yet we hear this time and time again.

Do BrightHouse advocate unlawful practices. Answers on a postcard dropped through a letterbox.

 

The only way they can take the goods back is if

a) You let them

b) They get a court order

c) You leave the goods outside

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they would also be acting against the law

 

which is why i posted that link.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i'm right in what i'm thinking, you are wanting to give the goods back and recover any payments you have made thus far?

 

Firstly if i was you i would NOT let them in to your property unless they turn up with a court order or you are consenting for them to take the goods,

anything they wish to discuss can be talked about at the door,

after all we are only talking about 2 weeks late payments here (plus late payment charges).

 

Unfortunately (im no expert so i would double check) you will not be able to claim any money back from them if you wish to return the goods.

On your agreement there will be a section titled Termination: Your Rights.

 

On an agreement i have in front of my from an item i have purchased from them it states :

 

'You have a right to end this agreement.

To do so, you should write to the person you make your payments to.

We will then be entitled to the return of the goods and to HALF the total amount payable under the agreement, that is £XXX.XX.

If you have already payed at least this amount plus any overdue instalments and have taken reasonable care of the goods, you will not have to pay any more.'

 

I understand where you are coming when you say 'if they take the goods without consent are they breaching the agreement'.

If i were you i would find out if they need written consent to remove goods.

If you invite them in and let them remove goods, in my opinion this would be considered as consent and it doesnt state on the agreement that it has to be 'written' consent.

 

If this was to get messy and go to small claims court, you might have a battle on your hands proving you did not give them verbal consent,

i would also consider the fact you are a self admitted regular late payer.

 

Lets get thing in to perspective,

i know you are angry about the harrasment and this issue definately needs to be adressed

but are you really willing to let them walk away with your two years of payments then put your tv back on the shelf as reconditioned or alternatively have a small claims court battle,

all because of two weeks late paymnets (plus any late payment charges).

 

If i were you i would just bite the bullet pay the account up to date,

finish paying the last year on the tv off and never deal with them again now you know what to expect from them.

 

pinkfloydianuk

ALL COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS MADE ARE BASED ON MY OWN EXPERIENCES AND OPINIONS, IF IN DOUBT SEEK ADVICE FROM A QUALIFIED SOLICITOR.

 

<<<<IF YOU LIKE WHAT YOU READ, DON'T FORGET TO HIT THE STAR AND GIVE ME SOME REP.

 

ANY PRIVATE MESSAGES DEEMED TO BE NON SUBJECT RELATED, DEROGATORY OR INSULTING WILL BE REPORTED.

 

pinkfloydianuk

 

:attention:

Link to post
Share on other sites

'they' can NEVER take goods even WITH a COURT ORDER

 

they are NOT bailiffs and NEVER EVER will be

 

only court bailiffs can take goods - end of!!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and they have NO remit to add ANY penalty charges either.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
but if my wife states that she is not giving them consent to remove goods then surely they are clearly in breach of the agreement if they do so

 

They will lie. They will say that she consented, and there's two of them to swear to it. You will never prove otherwise. Unless your wife is able and willing to wear a recording device, this is a poor tactic. If she's ready for a bit of espionage then it might work out really well - catch them on tape saying that they are taking the goods against her protests, and you have an unloseable claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so how long will it take them to get a court order to remove my goods? and if they cannot remove my goods as you say DX how do they go about getting their items back.

 

 

im currently 2 weeks i arears and my local store called me threatening to come and remocve my goods. but when i spke up and said "fine go get yourself a court order then come back to me" she shut up then tried to explain that they do not need a court order,n after the discussion went on for a few more mins she finaly gave in and i think she recognised that i was not going to juts lay down and take it and that i knew what i was talking about (all thanks to CAG).

 

apologies for the bad spelling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say I have heard of any company (BH,BAYV,Perfect Homes) going to court. I'm sure it must happen on occasion.

Obviously you could hand the goods back or you could come to some arrangement to clear the arrears but do not sign a new agreement without checking with CAG first

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi silver fox

I have just spoke their head office and they refuse to let me make the payments up over a period if time as they don't accept part payments.

I stated that if it wasn't for there unlawful fees I would be able to bring my account up to date. I asked if they would waive these fees to which they refused.

 

I'm currently waiting for my paperwork from Brighthouse do I claim back all the fees they have charged me over the last few years.

Bit don't know where I go from here in my current situation. Even if I offer to make a small payment try actually refuse to take it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to head office, with the account number. Say that you are struggling financially, but you wish to pay as much as you can towards the arrears. Enclose a cheque for a small but useful amount - £20 to £50. They will phone you to refuse it, because they know that to put that in writing makes them look very bad. Have a tape recorder ready.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...