Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I dont want to, i just wanted to relate with this person. The council just wants to rip off people
    • I paid for the furniture with a visa debit card so not sure if this is the same consumer rights as a credit card? The furniture is without a doubt unfit for purpose because of the reclining mechanism not working correctly. I suspect that I may be offered either a repair, a replacement or a credit note (that's if they accept that there are problems with the furniture). Do I have to accept a credit note or can I insist that I want a full refund?
    • Hi @Dislao As advice for everyone is different and tailored to your situation, please make your own thread and describe your issue.
    • Ok so they have given you the contract of you and packlink. your enforcing the rights of the contract between evri and packlink.... so I don't really think this contract makes a smudge of difference. unless ive missed something @BankFodder   Also on the bit that says "Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink,"   such agreement hasnt been provided so can't be considered. judges arent goign to consider a term that the defendant has just said exists. thats not how it works.    
    • I think Stockford Anderson are the land owners there. You could ring their London number 020 3443 8500 to confirm. if so the CEO paul Anderson and his son Aaron are about to climb Mount Everest to raise money for Dementia UK. There have been a number of fatalities on the mountain recently though the CEO of Iceland did complete the UK Dementia challenge last week. However the winds over Everest are going to increase in the next few days so anyone not on the way up at the moment are likely to be prevented from climbing.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can you claim without the interest?


Frankie B
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6448 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all this is my first post on here. I have had a search but cannot find an answer to this. Once I know the answer to this and get my 2nd letter sent out I will start a me Vs Nationwide thread which I will update.

 

I have just receieved my data protection details and am claiming back around £800 in fees and am happy to just claim back this amount. Can I modify my letter to advise Nationwide that I will not be claiming back interest charges at this time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Frankie, why wouldn't you want to claim back the charges?.....lol...Its add abit extra and you get 8% interest on the interset when you get to court. If your gonna claim for the interest charges later you are better off claiming them at the start. If you have an overdraft them you can only claim certain charges.

:p :p :pCARMEN :p :p :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main reason was just that I have an overdraft facility on the account so working out what I can and cant claim could get tricky. I wouldn't want to mess it up and not get my money back or have to start again.

 

At the end of each months statement there is a summary page for the charges. When I have been charged for unathorised overdraft etc there is an interest charge underneath and on months were there are no charges there is still an interest charge, although much lower because I am still in my overdraft.

 

So I'm guessing I just ignore those and claim for the months they have stung me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally demanded all the charges that were unlawful in my preliminary and LBA letters. When I filed in court I used the spreadsheet and claimed the 8% and also added that the 8% was incurring daily. it is amazing how much extra this adds on. In fact in some of my cases I was hoping that they didn't settle before court action as the 8% is well worth having.

Hope this helps and I would defo go for the interest.

 

Polly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies. You guys are good, very quick and helpful! I feel less worried already. I have a little more reading to do on here regarding the spreadsheet, then I'm going to total it all up and go for the interest. Once the letter goes out I will start a new thread. Thanks again. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Frankie B

I didn't quite understand it at first as we have an overdraft on our account which we are constantly using, so I was concerned about working out the interest etc.

However, after much deliberation I decided to claim for compounded contractual interest on the charges only (not on any interest charges) this is 24.9% which is NW current unauthorised borrowing charge. If you intend to go down this route please look into properly so you fully understand what you are actually claiming.

By doing this you cannot claim the 8% at court stage but it does make a huge difference. From our original claim of £2,200 over a six year period, it takes it to an astonishing £4,300 - have a good think about what route to go down but make sure you are comfortable with your decision. You can then tell them of your intentions from the beginning in your prelim letter.

If you want to go down this road, let us know and between us we can point you in the right direction - good luck :)

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...