Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Citifinancial PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if anybody can assist me.

 

Several years ago i had a loan with Citifincial, i refinanced the loan and at one point i had two loans.

I sold my house, and bought another and paid off the outstanding loans, in the region of 20k, in 2005.

 

I remember that these loans had PPI included, as when i told them i did not want PPI at the time, as i was covered in work, they said if i did not take out PPI, i would not get the loans, at the time i needed the money.

 

I decided to try to recover the PPI money, but i was unsure if i could after so long.

 

I sent them letter stating that i wanted a refund of my PPI insurance and i would be in touch with the exact amount, i did not even have an account number.

I have looked everywhere but i cannot locate the agreements, all i have is a letter from the solicitor when i sold my house stating that CitiFinancial had been settled, 20k.

In the mean time i received a letter from Citifinancial acknowledging my complaint and that it had agreed a waiver with the Financial Authority and that they would respond in 12 weeks.

 

I have looked everywhere but I cannot find the agreements and i do not know the exact amount of the PPI that was paid on the agreements.

 

The deadline for a final response was the 9th January 2012, i received a letter on the 4th January 2012, stating my complaint has been upheld.

 

They have listed the three account numbers, but they have stated that as some of the loans had been 'topped up', the figure offered is for all three, there is no breakdown, but they have offered £2,525.20, interest on premiums paid £600.22, plus 8% interest £1,005.90, less any previous rebate paid £1,292.85, total £2,838.47.

I am confused by the deduction made, they state that this is an previous rebate that i have received as a result of PPI being cancelled.

I have never cancelled any PPI and they were paid in full of which i have the settlement figure, or is it because i settled the loans early and the interest was reduced, does this affect the PPI.

 

They state this is the final response.

 

They state that the cheque will be sent in 10-15 working days, do i wait for the cheque, and then cash it.

Can i then go back and request for my agreements by sending a SAR, or can i ask them to give a breakdown of the PPI premiums.

I suspect the PPI i paid was a lot more, and i am surprised of how easy they have accepted and offered a refund, especially when i had no information.

But i am unsure of what to do now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome

 

I would send a SAR to them...see what they've got.

 

A ppi rebate may well have been given since you settled one or more of the loans early.

 

You would do well to check the figures they are offering when the SAR comes back.

 

In the meantime you can also write to the to request a breakdown of their figures.

 

Also have a read of No.1 in my signature.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd get the SAR off as soon as possible.

 

If it were me I'd not bank the cheque as this could be taken as an acceptance. That cheque will be good for 6 months though (assuming they are paying by cheque)

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...