Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

12 Days plus 2


dive1082
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes use the account in dispute letter from the CAG library

( green tab top LH side of forum)

Always head I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any

company you claim to represent.

Any lawful request for documents or information is

not an acknowledgement of liability.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I have sent this letter today to the DCA's and will keep you updated of their response.

 

 

"Dear Sir/Madam,

RE: ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE − Account/Reference Number

 

Thank you for your letter, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On XXXXXXXXXI made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/78. This was acknowledged by you in your recent letter.

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on 06th December 2011.

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document. In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore, you are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before you/your client enters into a default situation.

 

This limit has expired.

 

 

As you are no doubt aware section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become currently unenforceable at law.

 

As you have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, failed to send a full statement of the account and failed to provide any of the documentation requested. You will also be aware of the CPUTR 2008 and the OFT's guidelines on debt collection which state under the title Deceptive and/or unfair methods - Examples of unfair practices are as follows - 2.8

 

(i) - 'Failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued'

 

(k) - 'Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonable queried or disputed debt'

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 21 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you. This should be in writing; I have no wish to correspond by telephone.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear all,

 

After sending the letter to the DCA's telling them that they haven't provided me with the copy of the agreement within the timescale, I have received 5 letters (all identical) from one of them. The letters go like this:

 

"Dear XXXX"

 

We are waiting for your credit agreement

 

I am afraid we have not received a copy of your credit agreement from XXXXX yet. They are still trying to retreive it from their archives. We have placed your account on hold until we receive further information.

 

When we have received it from them, we will post it to you straight away.

 

We won't write to you again until we have the agreement but if you have any questions in the meantime please call us on XXXXXXXXX"

 

 

So, does anyone know what I can do now? They have failed to provide it within the legal time frame.

 

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ball is in their court now. I would now forget them until they come up with the goods (if ever)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Does anyone know how I would go about trying to get these removed from my credit file? Is this possible? This is the bit I am interested in as it will make no real difference if it stays on my file even if I pay it or not.

 

I don't know what the process is now that the DCA have failed their statutory duty.

 

Anyone help out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I have had a response from one of the DCA's regarding the 12 day letter I have sent. Does anyone know where I can upload this for all to see and advise me on it?

I have uploaded them as an attachment but don't know if theis is showing on here.

Regards

 

Dive1082

Cabot response to 12 day expiry.doc

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's posted ok, seems they have suspended all collection activity

as they cannot retrieve the agreement.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This looks like thats what they are saying Brigadier....

 

Is there a way to get this off my credit file as this is a disputed credit agreement? Also, this is a duplicate agreement on my file as the original creditor is showing as well as this DCA and both are in default which makes it double bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, this time of year is going to make it difficult to

conclude much.

The fact that an account is disputed is not going to

get entries removed, you must place a notice of dispute

on all the CRAs displaying the entry.

Write to both the DCA and the creditor as a formal complaint

stating that there can only be ONE DEFAULT ENTRY ON ANY

ACCOUNT, copy this to the CRAs and give a 14 day limit to

reply or you will report the matter to the ICO.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dive, keep it ad hoc this is a very much individual complaint.

Start by laying out the events chronologically, then state that

ONE DEBT ONE DEFAULT the current one should be the one

from the DCA wich should be just an amendment of the original

entry and must be dated at the same default date as the original.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would something like this do Brig:

 

Thank you for your letter dated 13th December 2011, the contents of which have been noted.

 

I would like to formally complain regarding this account as I do not recognise this account or debt. As you are unable to provide me with the copies of the original signed credit agreement, I can only assume that this matter is now closed.

I would also like to complain that according to my recent copies of my credit file, this account is showing as a separate credit account that is in default. This is in addition to the account that is in default from the original creditor. This in effect shows two accounts in default for the same account which is not correct.

I am now formally requesting that these accounts be removed from ALL credit reference agency records within 14 days of receipt of this letter. Failure to do so, will result in a complaint to the information Commissioners Office, the FSA and the OFT.

Yours Faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

dive that's great, it doesn't look as if it has been

copied or templated, that can be copied to all parties.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...