Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking in private residents' car park


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4591 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if anyone would be so kind as to give me their thoughts on this.

 

We are residents in a Housing Association flat although we rent it privately (and pay double the rent!) from a private landlord.

 

The flats have private residents' car park and my husband has 2 cars parked in it that are SORN'ed but the tax has run out.

 

The HA has now put notices on them that they have to be taxed or they will remove them by 17 November and we have no right to park on the land.

 

Is this true as we are residents?

 

We are waiting to get some money up together to get the cars sorted and back on the road or sell them.

 

The car park is very big and other residents can always get a space but someone may have complained.

 

Just really not clarification that we have no right to park SORN'ed cars in a private car park.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that the HA sees this as wrongful use of the carpark,

by storing cars on it that are on taxed or insured.

You need to contact the HA to find out their reasoning.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is the HA land, my personal opinion is try to speak to HA explaining situation and try to resolve the situation, as for legal implications I cant really advise

.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at a couple of things on residential

car parks in general it seem there are restrictions on

storing untaxed and uninsured vehicles, check also with

your landlord and your tenancy agrrement.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suspect that they can remove them

having given formal notice to you.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

there have been a few threads like this before

 

as far as i can remember, as long as there is nothing stated in the T&C

then there is nothing they can do about them

and are just being picky.

 

there is no law as such, though, if the car park has non gated access i think you are outside the law as they should be insured?

as if they catch fire/or are torched, you are responsible for damage they cause?

 

if they are insure, i dont think there's nowt they can do about then

 

have a read around

 

you'll have to use the advanced search top right

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably the landlord has a lease for the flat? That should set out the rules of the car park.

 

The 'landlord' has a lease the OP doesn't as its a HA property its probably against the tennancy to sub let anyway so if he kicks up a fuss he will probably get evicted along with his cars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update on this if anyone is interested. Contacted the HA and they refuse to budge on this, they extended the notice to 6 December for us though. Seems unbelievable someone can threaten to take away your property, but it seems they can. We want to repair the cars but are waiting for some compensation money which is just nearly at completion point (after 3 years!) but of course we don't know when exactly when it will come. Trying to get friends help to keep them till we can now. Thanks to everyone who posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the eyes of the law, if the public have acces to the property and the car park then the cars must meet the same requirements as if they were on the road. The HA is being more than fair. They could if they want contact the local council, police or DVLA and have them removed straight away.

 

In all fairness your financial problems are no concern of the other residents who will likely not want to see old broken down cars parked in their street.

 

DX makes very good points of you would be financially responsible if one caught fire and damaged another persons car or worse still burnt down one of the properties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

what has most likely happened is you Landlord has bought the Flat from the Housing Association Only and not purchased any parking spaces. Therefore it does not entitle you as a Private tenant to the right to use the Housing Associations parking spaces.

 

You Really need to check your Tenancy Agreement from your Landlord as the parking space provide will be for the housing associations tenants use and not yours.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...