Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help needed for another ESA tribunal question


lala1984
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4598 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Sorry for so many questions I feel incredibly stupid right now.

 

As per my previous post I won my tribunal case and ready the letter they gave me I just don't understand one thing.

 

At the top they say I have limited capability for work, it then goes on to state that I do not have limited capability for work-related activity, this is because none of the descriptors in Schedule 3 applies and nor does regulation 35.

 

What does that mean exactly?

 

Hope someone can help

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means, basically, that you've been placed in the work-related activity group (the WRAF) [On edit, I meant WRAG, not WRAF. You have not been placed in the Womens' Royal Air Force.]. It's infuriatingly complex, but the gist of it is that it's considered that your ability to work right now is limited, but your condition isn't so bad that you couldn't possibly consider working at all. So you would be expected to attend some work focused interviews, though you can't be forced to apply for jobs or do anything else except actually show up and participate in these interviews.

 

The "Schedule 3 descriptors" are a specific set of conditions that, if you meet one of them, would place you in the Support Group - giving you a little more money and removing requirements to participate in the work focused interview. The letter is saying you don't satisfy any of these conditions. If I remember correctly, regulation 35 covers exceptional circumstances - situations where it's blatantly obvious you're too ill to work. Say, if you're terminally ill and not expected to live more than 6 months; or if you're missing both legs, an arm and one eye, or some such thing.

 

So:

 

  • the tribunal has ruled (and the DWP has accepted) that you do have limited capability for work
  • but that you don't have no capability to work at all
  • so you're placed in the WRAG and your payments will reflect this
  • and you'll be expected to attend up to 6 work focused interviews
  • but your benefit can't be stopped or sanctioned as long as you attend and participate in these interviews
  • in other words, they can't force you to take a job or apply for jobs

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats brilliant Antone, thank you very much.

 

Well this group thing sounds stupid if I only have to go to the appointments and nothing else.

 

This is all just so much hassle, I'd love to get back into the work place but at the moment I can't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats brilliant Antone, thank you very much.

 

Well this group thing sounds stupid if I only have to go to the appointments and nothing else.

 

This is all just so much hassle, I'd love to get back into the work place but at the moment I can't.

 

No problem (and on rereading, sorry if that post sounded flippant). The official, party line, I guess (I used to be an ESA processor) would be that the government believes that work can help folks in some situations. And personally, I believe there are some cases where that is true - I've suffered from some types of depression myself, and did find that it helped to work if I could.

 

But there's the real problem - "if I could". I was never so badly depressed that I couldn't possibly work, and for that I am grateful. But some people are badly affected. And the same applies to people with heart problems, dodgy legs, pickled livers, or any of the myriad conditions that might affect any one of us at some point in our lives.

 

For reasons of political expediency, the last two governments have decided that sick people are a target.

 

Anyhow, rant over. The idea behind the WRAG is that, while you may have limited capability for work, it's worth keeping the idea in your mind,, making sure you never lapse to a point where you lose the ability to ever consider yourself as part of the workforce. And I understand the idea. I don't want to see groups of people written off by society as economically useless simply because they are sick. The implementation, however, stinks. OK, maybe my rant wasn't over.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:). I think they gave me limited capability as I have to go to my doctor at least once a week and I have hospital appointments coming up and I feel no potential employer would ever consider giving me a job at the moment due to the absenses I'd need.

 

Once all the is out of the way and fingers crossed I'm getting better I'd either go to college or find a part time job to ease myself back into things

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...