Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scotland / England - which law applies?


ninjag
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4627 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I'm new here and would greatly appreciate some help.

 

I racked up a few unsecured debts in the past whilst living in London and since 2006 I made deals with them all and cleared a few and still pay off three on the monthly and have so far never missed a payment.

 

Another unsecured debt has cropped up again which I'm sure I paid but according to them I haven't. It's only for just under £2K but I'm wondering where I stand. Here's the details:

 

The agreement was made in England whilst I was living in London (in 2003 according to my credit file)

  • The last payment ever made according to my credit file was in May 2006 whilst I was still living in London (in June 2006 it shows a "1" on my Experian file)
  • The default date on my credit file is showing as March 2009 which is odd considering the last payment was made in May 2006.
  • I moved to Scotland in 2006 and have resided there ever since
  • The only time I received correspondence from them was in July 2009 upon which I replied on the same day stating that I did not acknowledge the debt and I asked for copies of any signed contracts/agreements, statements of payments made and copies of the most recent correspondence; whilst reiterating that these requests did not constitute an admission of liability.

I never received a response to my request but I thought that under the Data Protection Act they had to provide me with such information? I'm not sure though.

 

I've heard nothing since until today upon which the original company Black Horse Finance have sold the debt to Lowell Portfolio 1

and they are now looking for payment or they will pass the account over to Lowell Financial Ltd.

 

Now, putting aside the fact that Lowell Financial Ltd's credit file is loaded with CCJ's against them including a recent one in July 2011 for £14,592

they've got a mighty cheek chasing others for money!!!

 

Not to mention that their profit after tax is negative £1.8M and their working capital is negative £8M and their net worth is negative £4.9M - yep, they are insolvent!

One might think that it's ok because they are part of the Lowell Group Ltd, but they have a working capital of negative £19M

and a net worth of negative £92M so they are also in the brown stuff..

..ok, I'm getting side tracked here because all that doesn't really matter.

 

What I'd really appreciate is which law applies?

Is it the Law where the contact was originally formed being England or is it the law where I reside permanently being Scotland?

I own my house here and pay council tax and I am on the voters role here in Scotland.

 

If it's Scottish Law then would it be safe to say the five years is up and I'm in the clear? Or is it English Law and should I lay low for another 8 months?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

scottish

 

does this and all of the debts you are paying show on oyur cra?

 

if not - no pay time

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

scottish

 

Thanks for the speedy reply and that's good news indeed!

 

I'm paying off one loan and two credit cards of which the Loan and Credit card (both BOS) are on my credit file. The other card isn't on it but I've been paying that each month without fail since it defaulted and I'm guessing it may be on my Equifax file (or some other credit reference agency) instead which I've never checked. There are other debts on my Experian credit file which I cleared in the past without defaulting them.

 

I made deals on the loan and two credit cards directly with the debt collectors of the banks and not through someone like the CCCS or other debt management firm.

 

Speaking of my Experian file, it states that all debts will no longer show on it after 6 months from the date of default and that will be next year. So I'm guessing that even the ones I'm still paying will come off my file and essentially I'll have a much nicer credit score?

 

 

Thanks again

 

 

 

does this and all of the debts you are paying show on oyur cra?

 

if not - no pay time

 

dx

 

 

EDIT: Just to confirm, are you saying that if this particular debt which is over 5 years old is showing on my credit file then I can't claim the 5 year rule?

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope not in the least......

 

sb clock starts ticking from YOUR last financial transaction

 

i am a wee bit concerned you appear to be paying DCA's

 

i would NEVER EVER pay a dca unless they have brought the debt

and even then ONLY after i'd seen a CCA out of them.

 

have you also looked at reclaiming

unlawful fees [late/over/phone/letter/cats died] & mis-sold PPI

 

it would be interesting to see a list with some dates and history for each debt

 

poss start a thread for each one in the named OC forum?

 

i'm sure we can save you money here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope not in the least......

 

sb clock starts ticking from YOUR last financial transaction

 

Nice one!

 

i am a wee bit concerned you appear to be paying DCA's

 

i would NEVER EVER pay a dca unless they have brought the debt

and even then ONLY after i'd seen a CCA out of them.

 

Sorry, I'm a little lost here. What's a DCA and what's a CCA?

 

 

have you also looked at reclaiming

unlawful fees [late/over/phone/letter/cats died] & mis-sold PPI

 

I'm not sure what fees may be classified as unlawful and not sure about PPI, although I'm sure that due to my age and income at the time of taking out all these debts I would never had obtained so much credit unless I ticked the PPI box - which was the clever/easy way of getting the credit. In retrospect it was very foolish and isn't making life any easier.

 

it would be interesting to see a list with some dates and history for each debt
I'll post the details below in a seperate thread. I can only get the details from my Experian report so which details would be required as there's only really the default date, default amount, current balance and date updated.

 

Thanks again for the reply. I do believe that if you borrow money then you should pay it back but to be honest the interest and charges were so crazy I've probably paid the principle back twice over! lol

Edited by ninjag
Link to post
Share on other sites

dca=debt collection agency, ie NOT THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR

anything labelled 'fees' [other than bank account charges] on statements can be reclaimed

i bet you have loads.

as for PPI get reclaiming too

time to do some reading around

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again. The DCA has bought the debt for this recent one so that's all above board I guess.

 

I've tried in the past to get statements / copy contracts but they won't provide them and simply ignore my letters. When the collection agency calls they say that I have to contact the actual bank and round and round we go! lol

 

The collection agencies for the older stuff are not charging interest or fees, it's all frozen and I can see the full amount I pay monthly being allocated against the balance on my credit file so I think it's ok in this case to be paing the DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

me thinks you are taking what these DCA's say as to much of the truth.

 

and you mention more than one debt?

 

have you CCA'ed and got paperwork back for ALL the debts you are paying to DCA's?

 

and you talk of 'callers?

 

if this is to your door - not alloweed in scotland

 

if to your phone -

why are you takling to them!!

 

never ever discuss your debts on the phone to a spoofing DCA

that have NO LEGAL POWERS TO DO NOWT to you.

 

more info please.

 

something smells here!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What does CCA mean? I hope it doesn't mean County Court Action!!! :!:

 

The only paperwork I've received was the letter from the DCA with the balance etc. It was all correct though but I would like to see the original contracts and statements as I'd be interested to see what interest I've paid over the years. If it's all accurate numbers etc then are they still a spoof DCA? Do you reckon they are skimming some interest off my payments?

 

Nobody has ever come to my door and I only ever get either a letter or a phone call every six months to do a review. Strangely, the BOS DCA called a month or so ago and I explained I couldn't change the amounts and they accepted this. But just the other week BOS have been directly trying to call me about a review??? Don't they talk to each other?

 

Also, I would have thought the DCA can start action against me on behalf of BOS?

 

 

Thanks again!

 

 

Forgot to add, the DCA is Blair, Oliver & Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

cca anyone you are paying

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...