Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Garage carrying out work without authority


QwertyIan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4639 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

wifes car went in for standard service.

booked it in, agreed price, droped it off, no problem.

 

came back to pick it up and they handed me a bill for 4 new tyres!

 

I told them it did not need the new tyres, the old ones where within the legal limit, and even if one or more of them was not ,they had no right to remove them.

 

They claimed they tried to call but couldnt get hold of me ( absolute lie, my phone was on all day)

 

I refused to pay for them and they refused to release the car.

 

After much agro and a physical confrontation, i finally got the car back.

The garage are claiming to be suing me for not paying for the 4 tyres but ive heard nothing in 3 days and I think they are bluffing me.

4 tyres i didnt need or want.

 

Where do i stand?

BTW, i asked them to return the old tyres but they claim they couldnt as they had been disposed off.

 

If they had not given me the keys, where would I have stood?

 

Has anyone else ever fallen for this trick?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they had not given me the keys, where would I have stood?

 

The same place as another poster, at the bus stop. Sorry Ian, couldn't resist that.

 

So do I take it that you have got the use of your car ?

 

Did they set any conditions on giving you back the keys?

Have you been properly billed for the tyres?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they gave me a bill after giving me the keys which i ripped up in their face and walked out.

 

i have had no contact since.

 

can you post a link to the other person who suffered this trick? its disgraceful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I pressume you did pay for the work you did ask them to do?

As for the tyres you were right not to pay and I think they realised they were on a sticky wicket and let you take it; I suppose they could of just put the old ones back on again ( in fact surprised they did not do that ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes.

when i dropped of the car i paid for the service.

on my return i expect to pick up the keys, no more.

They also had a look at a few things but as the car was in warranty there was no issue.

 

i guess new tyres/exhaust/brakes are the only thing they can try it on with.

 

Utter ****.

 

i think they didnt want to put the old ones on because it was getting late and I was refusing to leave the show room.

Link to post
Share on other sites

St.Helens Council have an approved garage scheme,and those whose names are on that list are expected to follow good practice,codes and standards.

If they can be shown not to have been doing this,then they are in breach of CPUT 2008,as they would be also for failing to uphold and codes of practice to other trade organisations they might be subscribed to.

Maybe worth looking at that.

Edited by MARTIN3030

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be a bit careful as to how you handle this, 3 days to hear nothing is not a long time these days. The crux will lie in what the signed job card says or what you said when handing over the car and how it could be interpreted.

In any event, as you have not paid for the tyres you don't own them so far from what Ray suggests that some you win, you could potentially end up with an expensive bill. The fact that you "ripped up" the bill "in their face" and subsequent use of calling them "utter ****" suggests to me that you were threatening and in those circumstances I always instructed my staff to just release the car and management will take care of the issue through the proper process and channels.

 

If there was any ambiguity as to the instructions then what should have happened is that you allow them to change the tyres back or even if close to closing time arrange a suitable appointment to have them changed without taking too long. The longer you leave it the more likely they will persuit you and the greater the cost. Afterall you are benefitting from their new parts at the moment which you have no entitlement to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, i didnt 'lose it' until; after an hour of trying to be diplomatic didnt work.

 

I asked them time and time again to go and put the old ones back on and they refused claiming they hasd been taken off site.

 

fortunatly, i have an email i sent them enquiring about how much was it for a service.

i have their reply with the price and my further reply that if they serviced it, if they could also look at some warranty issues (suspension arm).

My email stated at the end 'only the warranty issue and service need addressing'.

 

 

There was no mention of tyres or doing any extra work.

 

In the past, even when I have had company cars the garage has always paid me the courtesy of phoning before carrying out any further works they considered neccessary.

 

they didny make any attempt to contact, my phone recieved no calls at all on the day, so there was no potential for them to find my phone engaged.

 

furthermore, im convinced the tyres where legal - its a 2 and a half year old car which has only done 24,000 miles.

I had them balanced in march and the guy said they where fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have a bit of a problem with being convinced about the tyres being OK at 24K miles in this day and age. Generally now, believe it or not, most are rated to 18,000 only.

 

However in your case I'd be inclined to send the garage a letter stating that you wish to resolve the issue by having your original tyres back or based on pro rata general wear limits you will pay a price less the amount you think reasonable wear based on the same tyre average purchased price from 3 seperate dealers.

Note that if they do not respond within 14 days then you reserve your right to keep the tyres etc. You need the legal bods on here to look at it but I don't see too much difference between asking a company to collect an item from home within a certain time and you keeping them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,I agree with the above.

You need to take control of the situation and put something in writing.

Then if they do pursue this further,you will be able to show that you have tried to sort things out.

If it ends up with a small claims action.a Judge would be looking at all the evidence on the table from both sides.

I find it strange that the garage disposed of the old tires so quickly,and that you were not shown them.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

havent heard of this one but did know about the old oil can and suspension damper trick where by mechanics squirt 3in1 oil so it trickles down the damper and they call you in under the ramps to show you the 'Faulty damper'

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did have a run in years back when I went to pick up my Isuzu truck at the local dealership and they tried to rip me off for almost £600.00 for a quoted service of £180.00 they said that I owed for a set of wind deflectors 'i'd paid for them 10 months before' and also £300.00 as an extra payment on to top deck to the pick up bed 'also paid for 10 months before' so I said no I will NOT be paying for those items and that if they insisted I pay the revised bill then i will sue them for 4 new doors and a completely new pick up bed due to the holes thet had drilled in it to secure the items listed that were fitted and PAID for some 10 months before:-x I then went on to raise my voice even more to say that the garage relied on the little elderly and or timmid people 'some where waiting to pay their bills' who they rip off at then £52.00 per hour costs and supply sundry items that are endless...well not me MR ...they reverted back to the £180.00 and asked if I would be happier paying that so I said NO i'd much prefer it to be £140 or under 'inc VAT' and that was what they charged me in the end...I think they wanted me to leave ha ha ha...never ever went back I found a great one man band mechanic to do all my work now at £15.00 per hour:-) and above all I trust him:whoo::whoo:

Edited by burlyb
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't class £52 per hour as rip off, I would call that a bargain. You have to take into consideration all the other running costs of a business and the wages of those that are not productive.

 

£15 per hour, won't even cover the basic bills of water, electricity, business rates and his own wages, (assuming he owns the building and has no rent or mortgage to pay).

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont have mates that charge you less for things ? thats sad...rest assured I DO and maybe it's due to we go back to the early 70's as great mates and there are mates rates if you have good mates and advice from him is always free despite you're inputs and semi put downs you dont know everything

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excuse me burlyb, I am putting no one down, I am talking from more years of experience than you have been on the planet. Now if you wish to continue along this line, then may I suggest that you open a thread of your own and we don't continue to post off topic on someone elses thread.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...