Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

help accused of stealing electricity by scottish power


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4721 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have had my flat for a year I have a pre pay meter. A month ago I came home to find my meter had been changed a letter said to contact scottish power as my meter had been tampered with. I did so and was told there was no problem my meter has just been changed and I would be sent out a new key.

Then today I get a letter saying they were adding a £230 for electricity I had stolen. I contacted thier revenue department and spoke with someone. She said the engineer had changed my meter and made a report that the supply had been bypassed and I was being billed for the esimated electricity I had stolen. They estimated it right back to when I moved in.

I asked why werent the police called as I have no knowledge of it being bypassed. She said we dont do that we just change the meter and bill you for the electricity you have stolen. I said I hadnt stolen any electricity.

She says their engineers report says I have..end of. I said hang on you come out change my meter, dont tell me anything at the time, dont give me any evidence other than our engineer made a report, and on that you accuse me of theft and add £££ to my account. Yes was the answer but you can appeal against it if you want.

There was no manager to speak to and she said to write in with an appeal.

How do I stand here I feel Ive been stitched up. I spoke to my housing assn and they dont get involved in disputes with power companies. She did suggest that perhaps the previous tennant had by passed the supply and reconnected it before I moved in and suggested I ask them to check before I moved in.

 

I am going to write in but the attitude I got when I rang I cant see it doing much.

 

How do I stand has any one else had similar happen.

 

I have just applied to another supplier to take over my supply because I dont want to pay this money, its already onmy key to be taken. Will a change be possible or will whats happened cause problems.

 

Thanks Im really concerned and confused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have the proof of what you paid onto the key/card of your old meter,receipts etc?

 

Did you take meter reading on entering the flat and have they given you reading on old meter?

 

Did you notify them you were using the meter or was it just continued on from another tenant using the meter?

 

 

I know nowt more than what others learn on here, but just thought these questions may help 'those in the know' to help you xx :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

When I first moved in they reset the key. At the begining of this year they sent me an estimated bill asking for payment. I contacted them and they said there was no record of me paying any money on the key account. After being passed on a few times my payments were found and I gave them meter readings and the amounts I had paid were correct to the readings so the estimate request was dropped. Then in june I came home to find the meter had been changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The meters are in a communal hallway but in cupboards by each door.

The original letter stuck in the cupboard when the meter was changed just said the meter had been tampered with.

The letter today starts with

United Utilities Revenue Protection Service acting on behalf of your electricity supplier Scottish Power, carried out an inspection of the metering and associated equipment on the 6/6/11. There findings were as follows

Metering equipment bypassed

 

These irregularities mean that the quantity of electricity registered on the meter was less than you were in fact consuming. U URPS hasnow made a calculation of the shorfall, hence the attached bill.

Additional charges of £327 have been debited to your account and be repaid through your prepayment meter.

 

There ia another latter laying out the charge and that they could have disconnected the supply if they had wanted but decieded not to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is disgusting

 

judge jury and executioner!!

 

we have scpttish power on board here at cag

give them a few days

if they have not responded i'd be writing a very strong letter to the CEO and contacting OFGEM

 

ruddy cheek.

 

PROVE IT WAS YOU NOT JUST ASSUME

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres another idea that might be way off the mark, but any way, are you aware of any major works being done on the property prior to you moving in? If council probably not relevant but if private it has not been unheard of a builder of whoever to bypass the meter to save on costs and then restore it if you know what I mean. Could be case of forgot to restore it.

 

As said could be way off the mark, but if can show large works were carried out, it can be reasonable this was a poss cause.

 

Is the flat private or council?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

but how do I fight it, theyve decieded already Ive stolen it quoting the engineer report, theyve already added it to my account so as soon as I put money on my key they start taking it. From another thread Ive read I cant change supplier when theres a debt so they have got me over a barrell, if I want electricity I have to pay it.

I nkow nothing about electric and meters but I would have thought the actual meter would have shown that electric was being used through it everyday, but I havent even got that anymore as they changed it. So they have an engineer saying I stole it and theres nothing I can do in responce..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi its a housing assn... ive been told it was empty for quite a while before I moved in. The previous tennant never paid water rates etc and I get bills for them all the time in all differant names.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is where the scottish power rep can help and hopefully will post. It is the weekend so hopefully they will have read this monday at latest.

 

So try to relax over the weekend as easy as it is to say that and keep your head in here to see what appears.

 

I mean even from common sence I would think if someone is going to bypass a meter they are going to go the whole hog. You have been paying them and would have known there was a risk of a meter reader reporting a poss problem, so again common sence says it can be seen you prehaps had not got a clue that there was a problem.

 

Lets hope they see sence and help you xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi its a housing assn... ive been told it was empty for quite a while before I moved in. The previous tennant never paid water rates etc and I get bills for them all the time in all differant names.

 

See empty for quite a while private or not means they cannot rule out a third party did it and took advantage of itxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

just sit tight

 

we'll get it sorted when they come on line

 

if you wish to pm the rep

you are more than welcome

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. Were you putting plenty of credit on the meter, as much as you would expect? It's quite common for bypassed meters to be discovered by an incoming occupier, but obviously it's much easier to spot for a PP customer as they have much more contact with their meter than a credit customer.

Did you take a reading when you moved in? It used to be common on old token meters for people to buy a small amount of credit regularly to avoid suspiscion, but obviously that's much more difficult with key meters, as the read goes back every time & the credit would just build up on the meter. If you can show that you are using the same amount now as you were before the meter was changed, that would go in your favour.

Do you know if they are saying the meter was still bypassed at the time it was changed, or that there were signs that it had been & then the bypass removed before you moved in? (& this would be very obvious to the specialist engineers who do this sort of work).

Lastly, you will probably find a very hard attitude from people you deal with in their Revenue Protection team. They are used to dealing with some pretty nasty people & will have "heard it all before". So you may have a hard time, but stick with it, gather as much evidence/information as you can & keep trying. Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you all know the Scottish Power rep has got this sorted for me...

 

Thanks

 

Ok point taken

From the imformation I supplied the SP rep he looked into it for me.

It appears it was obvious that it was the previous tennant but the Revenue people had not bothered to look into that and instead blamed me as the current account holder.

If the SP rep had not taken this on for me I do not know if I would have been able to get the Revenue people to look into it further.

So for anybody in a similar situation who reads the thread I would suggest speaking with the reps.

 

Thanks to anyone that took an intrest in my problem, what did we do before the internet.

Edited by thekrankie
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

it would be nice if a resume was posted for future readers

 

it is all very well it being sorted

 

but many people come here to read and are afraid to post.

 

leaving a thread with a one liner helps no-one

 

cag is for EVERYONE

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok point taken

From the imformation I supplied the SP rep he looked into it for me.

It appears it was obvious that it was the previous tennant but the Revenue people had not bothered to look into that and instead blamed me as the current account holder.

If the SP rep had not taken this on for me I do not know if I would have been able to get the Revenue people to look into it further.

So for anybody in a similar situation who reads the thread I would suggest speaking with the reps.

 

Thanks to anyone that took an interest in my problem, what did we do before the internet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...